Airline Pilot Central Forums

Airline Pilot Central Forums (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/)
-   United (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/united/)
-   -   MIN Reserve Coverage (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/united/118058-min-reserve-coverage.html)

rightside02 11-25-2018 03:27 AM

I agree it’s a win howver , if there is no coverage what’s the point ? I tried to drop ALL my trips for next month knowing that most likely not all would actually go away . I figured maybe 2 . Nope , nothing dropped .

And they are mostly week day trips

Floyd 11-25-2018 05:18 AM


Originally Posted by sonnycrockett (Post 2708907)
my name is FLOYD!

MIN COVERAGE!!!!!!

Hey now! A blow to the family jewels don't you think? ;)

Tubs14 11-25-2018 07:37 AM


Originally Posted by UALinIAH (Post 2713566)
It’s a huge win. I can’t tell you how many times I tried to pick up a trip someone wanted to drop but couldn’t because CrewCompanion said it wasn’t legal for the other guy to drop due to min hours. On my fleet there are always senior guys looking to drop day trips and fly low time. It also greatly affects wide body guys. Many fleets wouldn’t even be able to trade because of the way IT set up the trades.

It’s not just about doing straight drops. The company will always control min res level unless we can change that in section 6 negotiations.

So yeah it was a HUGE win for a majority of the pilot group vs a small give for the very small minority.


I'm not sure what fleet you're on, but here's a perspective from a narrow body guy. The ability to drop below 50hrs is a great QOL Improvement for the entire pilot group. With that being said, now that we can see the pool display the company has put the numbers at 0 basically everyday so straight drops are impossible. Before, when we couldn't see the pool, straight drops worked a majority of the time during non-peak flying season.

The situation you refer to, being able to pick up another pilots trip that drops them below 50 is great when it works for the both of you. It's net 0 for the company and both of you are happy. The problem I see, in which you refer to it being a "HUGE" win for the majority of the pilot group, is the fact you already have to have the days off to pick up another pilots trip. Maybe it's just in ORD, but most of our lines are built to 13-14 days off and 80-85 hours. So what happens is nothing can be dropped due to coverage and none of your trips will be picked up because no one has the time off to do it.

I would argue that the "majority" of the pilot group would like to do straight drops and the "minority" are the ones picking up other people's trips.

BoJet 11-25-2018 01:07 PM

Don’t wanna fly 50 hours? Retire
It’s the contract that was voted on.
Wanna change it? Did you know we are in contract negotiations? That would be the venue for change.

GolferNJ 11-25-2018 03:40 PM


Originally Posted by BoJet (Post 2713827)
Don’t wanna fly 50 hours? Retire
It’s the contract that was voted on.
Wanna change it? Did you know we are in contract negotiations? That would be the venue for change.

I agree with this. Unfortunately, we just gave up 3-days transfer days (every 18 months) and conflict bidding for this. None of which was presented for a vote! It's hard to ask for a change of the contract when the MEC is unilaterally making changes in the midst of contract negotiations.

oldmako 11-25-2018 03:49 PM


Originally Posted by BoJet (Post 2713827)
Don’t wanna fly 50 hours? Retire
It’s the contract that was voted on.
Wanna change it? Did you know we are in contract negotiations? That would be the venue for change.


Some day over the long span of your career, you may have an outside event which will make you appreciate the ability to drop down to 50 hours. And best of all, you won't have to retire in order to do so. There's a lot of crap in this contract that I don't like and they were the reasons that voted no on it. Should I retire as well?

If the union can improve our contract, I'm all for it. Even if its a paragraph that I may never use.

APC225 11-28-2018 06:26 AM

Full-month COLAs for 19 positions in January.

okawner 11-28-2018 07:10 AM


Originally Posted by GolferNJ (Post 2713887)
Unfortunately, we just gave up 3-days transfer days (every 18 months) and conflict bidding for this. None of which was presented for a vote!

Bingo. How is this allowed?


Sent from my SM-G930V using Tapatalk

baseball 11-28-2018 05:56 PM


Originally Posted by GolferNJ (Post 2713887)
I agree with this. Unfortunately, we just gave up 3-days transfer days (every 18 months) and conflict bidding for this. None of which was presented for a vote! It's hard to ask for a change of the contract when the MEC is unilaterally making changes in the midst of contract negotiations.

Maybe get a do-over???

Sometimes we need to know both the devil and the details to find the devil in the details. Clearly, we didn't negotiate anything worthwhile and it appears we actually gave up something and got nothing in return. OOPS!

baseball 11-28-2018 05:57 PM


Originally Posted by okawner (Post 2715415)
Bingo. How is this allowed?


Sent from my SM-G930V using Tapatalk

We could challenge the legality of this. Can't negotiate something that changes the pay and benefits in a significant manner without a pilot vote. CBL issue. We could take it to the DoL.


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:03 PM.


Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands