![]() |
Corona/Max effects
As someone wading in the kiddie-pool, who is checking my email multiple times a day for a class date, what do those on the inside see or believe the real effects of the current COVID-19 and Max issues will be on future hiring (business as usual, short term hiring, a hiring pause, or dare I say the F word of which we do not speak?)
Sent from my SM-N950U using Tapatalk |
Originally Posted by C5Drvr
(Post 2983078)
As someone wading in the kiddie-pool, who is checking my email multiple times a day for a class date, what do those on the inside see or believe the real effects of the current COVID-19 and Max issues will be on future hiring (business as usual, short term hiring, a hiring pause, or dare I say the F word of which we do not speak?)
COVID-19 may be a temporary blip or it may cause a global recession. The MAX **should** be flying later this year or it might not. The stock market may crater or it might bounce to new highs. Fuel prices are low but we know how that can change. For now, UAL is doing exactly what they said we would do and are continuing to hire this spring but at a slower pace since we are mostly staffed for summer 2020. The plan is to rapidly spool up hiring once the MAX is fixed. As we all know, the plan is always changing. But the good news is we have lots of retirements coming up. This will greatly mitigate the threat of the F word absent a real calamity. EDIT: UAL just pulled its published 2020 investor guidance after the market closed today. "Beyond the first quarter, we believe the range of possible scenarios is too wide to provide earnings guidance at this time." Full text: http://ir.united.com/node/23236/html |
Originally Posted by cadetdrivr
(Post 2983090)
Nobody knows, and if they say they know they are lying. There are too many moving parts at this point.
COVID-19 may be a temporary blip or it may cause a global recession. The MAX **should** be flying later this year or it might not. The stock market may crater or it might bounce to new highs. Fuel prices are low but we know how that can change. For now, UAL is doing exactly what they said we would do and are continuing to hire this spring but at a slower pace since we are mostly staffed for summer 2020. The plan is to rapidly spool up hiring once the MAX is fixed. As we all know, the plan is always changing. But the good news is we have lots of retirements coming up. This will greatly mitigate the threat of the F word absent a real calamity. EDIT: UAL just pulled its published 2020 investor guidance after the market closed today. "Beyond the first quarter, we believe the range of possible scenarios is too wide to provide earnings guidance at this time." Full text: http://ir.united.com/node/23236/html Are we seeing any movement in staffing, specifically in the 777/787 as these fleets are the most exposed? What is being done with crews that would have flown the cancelled pairings? Can't imagine they are getting paid to just sit home. Sent from my SM-N950U using Tapatalk |
2020 Guidance pulled. Asia traffic down 75%. Europe next? Who knows.
Have a plan B, C and D! |
Originally Posted by Ni hao
(Post 2983164)
2020 Guidance pulled. Asia traffic down 75%. Europe next? Who knows.
Have a plan B, C and D! Sent from my SM-N950U using Tapatalk |
If there's one thing the world's central bankers learned in 2009, it's that quantitative easing fixes every economic problem.
|
Originally Posted by C5Drvr
(Post 2983146)
Are we seeing any movement in staffing, specifically in the 777/787 as these fleets are the most exposed? What is being done with crews that would have flown the cancelled pairings? Can't imagine they are getting paid to just sit home.
UAL is using some of the airplanes on domestic routes but those flights don't require 3 or 4 FOs so the fleets are overstaffed in the short term. That means there are more pilots than normal on reserve, but with fewer block hours combined with more pilots on reserve, the reserves are not being utilized at a normal level. So yes, there are guys at home getting paid. Since pilots are only trained and current on one fleet type at a time it's not like UAL can have them fly A320s, for example, in the interim. In the short term UAL will be offering reduced credit lines where pilots only receive 50 hours of pay but are OFF the entire month. For UAL it beats paying 73 hours for RSV pilots that are not used and there are pilots that are happy with reduced pay for known time off. If this becomes a longer term problem UAL will displace pilots off those fleets but that will require lots of training ($$$) so UAL does not want to do that as the first step. This is why everything is in limbo, nobody knows if this is short term or long term situation. |
So would UAL continue to bring pilots onbaord if they are paying pilots to sit at home? Seems to me that everything, except building a pool, would be put on hold, but that is me on the outside looking in?
Thoughts from the inside? Sent from my SM-N950U using Tapatalk |
Originally Posted by C5Drvr
(Post 2983311)
So would UAL continue to bring pilots onbaord if they are paying pilots to sit at home? Seems to me that everything, except building a pool, would be put on hold, but that is me on the outside looking in?
Economically, it would make total sense to hire pilots for the MAX deliveries **if** the widebody issue in the far east is considered temporary. UAL is constrained by a union contract with a seniority list. This is a good thing for both current and prospective pilots as the corporate economic decision matrix is quite different compared to a non-union airline. It's the scenario where there's a global recession (including the USA) where hiring stops. Period. One can also easily envision various plausible scenarios between the extremes. |
Originally Posted by cadetdrivr
(Post 2983242)
In the short term UAL will be offering reduced credit lines where pilots only receive 50 hours of pay but are OFF the entire month.
|
Originally Posted by HuggyU2
(Post 2983354)
Are you speculating or has this been announced?
announced.. |
Originally Posted by SparrowBird
(Post 2983362)
This virus is this decades 9/11. We'll all be luck not get furloughed.
|
Originally Posted by Winston
(Post 2983367)
Oscar season is over. Save that dramatic performance for next year.
filler |
Originally Posted by SparrowBird
(Post 2983371)
Someone should tell wallstreet that and pretty much every government in Europe as of this morning.
The virus has a low mortality rate and a vaccine is about to be tested on humans. I wouldn't be surprised if this is over before the Max flies another revenue flight. The big problem with Coronavirus is the incubation period. You can have been infected for more than a week before you suspect anything. I have faith in the world's medical professionals to have an effective vaccine available to the public in the near future. The media has done a great job of hyping Coronavirus. |
Originally Posted by SparrowBird
(Post 2983402)
Doesn't matter, if demand goes down it won't matter what the mortality rate is.
I'm thinking about starting a business of selling bubbles that people can live in. Then everyone could live like David Vetter. |
I think the most logical way to look at it is hope for the best but plan for the worst. If the virus isn't as bad as the hype, then great, if it's as bad or worse, you at least have a plan which can be modified to deal with it.
|
This virus is incredibly serious and could potentially effect all of us. As of right now it there are no signs of it being under control so all we can do is hope for the best. It is totally possible that there are 100s of cases in the US already due to the long incubation period and the huge amount of international air travel coming into our country.
|
Originally Posted by Intrdmnslalien
(Post 2983485)
I think the most logical way to look at it is hope for the best but plan for the worst. If the virus isn't as bad as the hype, then great, if it's as bad or worse, you at least have a plan which can be modified to deal with it.
IATA is estimating a .6% decline in international air travel in 2020, revised downward from a 4.1% increase previously forecast. https://www.cnbc.com/2020/02/20/coro...ince-2009.html Should the bottom 10% of the list have furlough plans? Definitely. Should those more senior have plans to be surplused down to a lesser paying seat with pay at say 75 hrs/mo? Definitely. Bottom line: live below your means as an airline pilot. At all times. You never know what's going to happen in the future. |
Originally Posted by nludy
(Post 2983507)
This virus is incredibly serious and could potentially effect all of us. As of right now it there are no signs of it being under control so all we can do is hope for the best. It is totally possible that there are 100s of cases in the US already due to the long incubation period and the huge amount of international air travel coming into our country.
Here's an even bigger killer than Coronavirus: https://www.msn.com/en-us/health/med...cdc/ar-BBZTLLN There are many things scarier/more deadly than Coronavirus. |
Why is that scare porn? It's called logic and science. Maybe spend less time on APC and do some actual research on the virus.
Comparing Covid-19 to the season flu shows how little you know. |
Originally Posted by nludy
(Post 2983519)
Why is that scare porn? It's called logic and science. Maybe spend less time on APC and do some actual research on the virus.
Comparing Covid-19 to the season flu shows how little you know. God, grant me the serenity to accept the things I cannot change, Courage to change the things I can, And wisdom to know the difference. What one can do is plan for the worse. And then stop running around spreading fear. |
Originally Posted by nludy
(Post 2983507)
This virus is incredibly serious and could potentially effect all of us. As of right now it there are no signs of it being under control so all we can do is hope for the best. It is totally possible that there are 100s of cases in the US already due to the long incubation period and the huge amount of international air travel coming into our country.
|
The mortality rate for the seasonal flu is .05% and Covid-19 is 2-3%.
|
Originally Posted by nludy
(Post 2983541)
The mortality rate for the seasonal flu is .05% and Covid-19 is 2-3%.
The mortality number is running ~2% at the moment. Let's see how things progress once there are vaccines out there. |
What’s interesting is quarantine and reduction
in global travel does not seem to stop the spread, yet that is exactly what people are doing. The response doesn’t seem to be rational. The amount of new cases in China is declining, and of course western society can not lock down cities with millions like an autocratic regime can. Furlough? Hope not. Non-rev first class with no stress? Yes!!! Also, the mortality rate varies significantly based on health, gender and age. Men are more likely to die, but younger healthy men are at a very low risk. I find it odd how in the 21st century it’s difficult for most, including the media and those educated, to interpret data and science and act rationally. Such is the human condition I suppose. The most ill I ever was happened in the sunshine of a resort and a nasty parasite. Yet I go back every year. Perhaps we will know more in a couple months? It seems as though typically these viruses begin to die out in the Spring as immunity increases and ease of transmission decreases with warmer weather. Seems like a lot of irrational hype now. But of course irrational hype effects business and careers. |
Hopefully this thing just blows over and there isn't a huge outbreak like some of these other countries. I did see something interesting and a bit concerning yesterday was that the CDC has only tested 400-500 people for the virus here, but South Korea for example has tested around 20,000. So we really don't know the real numbers here in the US yet.
Even if there is a temporary slow down with the airlines I would imagine with the pilot shortage it shouldn't effect us too much long term. |
Originally Posted by AntiPeter
(Post 2983556)
Also, the mortality rate varies significantly based on health, gender and age. Men are more likely to die, but younger healthy men are at a very low risk.
I find it odd how in the 21st century it’s difficult for most, including the media and those educated, to interpret data and science and act rationally. Such is the human condition I suppose. As for the human condition, I think that mankind always needs something to worry about and blow it out of proportion. Take climate change as the latest iteration of mass concern. |
Originally Posted by nludy
(Post 2983566)
Even if there is a temporary slow down with the airlines I would imagine with the pilot shortage it shouldn't effect us too much long term.
Make financial plans for the worst case and then stop worrying about this stuff. We don't have any control over it, and like I stated earlier, I have faith that medical professionals will be able to bring this under control - whether it be stopping the spread of Coronavirus or having an effective vaccine that is readily available |
Originally Posted by Andy
(Post 2983551)
Let's see how things progress once there are vaccines out there.
I’m optimistically looking at this whole event as an opportunity to further thin out the herd. |
Originally Posted by C5Drvr
(Post 2983186)
I do have B, working on C and D.
Sent from my SM-N950U using Tapatalk I remember when we had 3 year captains in 2001 and they ended up being 14year FOs. |
Originally Posted by cadetdrivr
(Post 2983242)
Actually, that's exactly what they are doing.
UAL is using some of the airplanes on domestic routes but those flights don't require 3 or 4 FOs so the fleets are overstaffed in the short term. That means there are more pilots than normal on reserve, but with fewer block hours combined with more pilots on reserve, the reserves are not being utilized at a normal level. So yes, there are guys at home getting paid. Since pilots are only trained and current on one fleet type at a time it's not like UAL can have them fly A320s, for example, in the interim. In the short term UAL will be offering reduced credit lines where pilots only receive 50 hours of pay but are OFF the entire month. For UAL it beats paying 73 hours for RSV pilots that are not used and there are pilots that are happy with reduced pay for known time off. If this becomes a longer term problem UAL will displace pilots off those fleets but that will require lots of training ($$$) so UAL does not want to do that as the first step. This is why everything is in limbo, nobody knows if this is short term or long term situation. |
Originally Posted by A320
(Post 2983610)
50hr no fly lines? I must have missed an email about that
|
Originally Posted by 89Pistons
(Post 2983618)
The ccs message was only sent to fleets/seats affected.
DCA 787 FO – 12 EWR 777 FO – 30 SFO 777 FO – 60 |
Originally Posted by Andy
(Post 2983533)
God, grant me the serenity to accept the things I cannot change,
Courage to change the things I can, And wisdom to know the difference. |
Originally Posted by Winston
(Post 2983579)
Incredibly, there was a small group of anti-vaxers waving signs outside the parking lot of my local Costco yesterday.
I’m optimistically looking at this whole event as an opportunity to further thin out the herd. |
Originally Posted by KonaJoe
(Post 2983734)
Prayer is the one thing we can all rely on to not work.
I have followed the guidance from the second line in preparation for worst case. As for the third line, I'm pretty sure I know the difference between what I have control over and do not. I'm not religious; it's just really, really good life advice. |
Originally Posted by Andy
(Post 2983775)
Yes, I suppose many are busy panicking over things that they have zero control over.
I have followed the guidance from the second line in preparation for worst case. As for the third line, I'm pretty sure I know the difference between what I have control over and do not. I'm not religious; it's just really, really good life advice. |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:01 PM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands