![]() |
Originally Posted by TimetoClimb
(Post 3023505)
I see. Many of us, including myself, want a union but the volition just in't there, yet.
|
Originally Posted by itsmytime
(Post 3023653)
yet you still willingly went to a non-union carrier.
|
Originally Posted by TimetoClimb
(Post 3023765)
The only other choice in my neck of the woods, was compass. I made my decision based on likelihood of survival during a downturn. At 1500 hrs beggars can't be choosers. I never imagined the sentiment between SKW and UAL would be so co-dependant/adversarial. UAL employed a family member since the late 70s, so I had nothing but admiration.
|
Originally Posted by itsmytime
(Post 3023653)
yet you still willingly went to a non-union carrier.
|
Originally Posted by Half wing
(Post 3023927)
I didn’t know what a union was when I was 21. But I did know Playboy magazine voted SkyWest to have the hottest flight attendants of any US carrier.
|
Originally Posted by Kung Flu Master
(Post 3023453)
One that will be nice to see is no more front of the line programs for entitled college kids such as aviate and propel.
|
Originally Posted by Airhoss
(Post 3022845)
His quote was, if things didn’t recover and we did have to park a fleet the 756 would be the first and the next fleet would be the Airbus. He said the he does not see a world in which the 50 seat RJ survives this. The 756 and then the 320 were worst case scenarios the 50 seat RJ was a near certainty.
That’s the version I watched yesterday, I’m not sure what you were watching. |
Originally Posted by JUNEBUG82
(Post 3024913)
We were told today by our UAX management that the 50 seat comment was taken out of context and intended to be a worse case scenario and was not the current plan. Being able to view the full town hall with some context around these comments would be really helpful. Does anyone have a link? The flyingtogether link seems to be down.
|
Originally Posted by JUNEBUG82
(Post 3024913)
We were told today by our UAX management that the 50 seat comment was taken out of context and intended to be a worse case scenario and was not the current plan. Being able to view the full town hall with some context around these comments would be really helpful. Does anyone have a link? The flyingtogether link seems to be down.
“My guess the 50 seaters mostly will be gone, by the end of this,” could possibly be taken out of context. Not trying to be snarky at you, just your management’s interpretation. |
Originally Posted by JUNEBUG82
(Post 3024913)
We were told today by our UAX management that the 50 seat comment was taken out of context and intended to be a worse case scenario and was not the current plan. Being able to view the full town hall with some context around these comments would be really helpful. Does anyone have a link? The flyingtogether link seems to be down.
|
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:23 PM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands