UAL pilots. Learn from this, remember scope
#31
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Dec 2019
Posts: 407
Likes: 0
Why the 50 seats though? I get they're not that great but they make a lot of money for the company by going into tiny markets. Short term I guess I understand but long term...are you telling me that 737s will be going into Hays, KS? Or that they're just going to give up towns like that? I don't buy it...
#32
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Apr 2018
Posts: 138
Likes: 0
From: E170 CA
Why the 50 seats though? I get they're not that great but they make a lot of money for the company by going into tiny markets. Short term I guess I understand but long term...are you telling me that 737s will be going into Hays, KS? Or that they're just going to give up towns like that? I don't buy it...
#33
I know it has been done in the past, but I don't see us rapidly parking an entire fleet type. We have quite a few 756s, 320s, and even 777s that are 25ish years old. I count 21 757s, 21 767s, 30 320s, and 5 777s that are hitting 25 years old or more as of right now. We could retire/part out older jets piecemeal as they approach heavy checks and such, including some problem children younger than 25 (any jet I've landed has probably never flown the same since).
It seems to me the benefit of slicing down fleets like this is that it reduces the number of potential displacements. That is, if we retired a dozen 756s tomorrow the number of CAs affected would be muted by retirements, and the junior FOs being displaced would only be able to bid to 320/737.
Having never witnessed this process first hand or being privy to fleet decision making considerations, this is just idle speculation on my part. I'd be very interested to learn more from folks with better insight or hard earned experience.
It seems to me the benefit of slicing down fleets like this is that it reduces the number of potential displacements. That is, if we retired a dozen 756s tomorrow the number of CAs affected would be muted by retirements, and the junior FOs being displaced would only be able to bid to 320/737.
Having never witnessed this process first hand or being privy to fleet decision making considerations, this is just idle speculation on my part. I'd be very interested to learn more from folks with better insight or hard earned experience.
#34
Banned
Joined: Mar 2018
Posts: 1,358
Likes: 0
Why the 50 seats though? I get they're not that great but they make a lot of money for the company by going into tiny markets. Short term I guess I understand but long term...are you telling me that 737s will be going into Hays, KS? Or that they're just going to give up towns like that? I don't buy it...
#35
Not a deal breaker for the one trip a year crowd but no business person (high yield) is doing that.
#36
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 291
Likes: 0
Why the 50 seats though? I get they're not that great but they make a lot of money for the company by going into tiny markets. Short term I guess I understand but long term...are you telling me that 737s will be going into Hays, KS? Or that they're just going to give up towns like that? I don't buy it...
#37
Banned
Joined: Mar 2018
Posts: 1,358
Likes: 0
I wonder how much high yield traffic is in Hays. I’ve been through there numerous times and there isn’t that much there outside of a sale barn, other farm and ranch related businesses, and some restaurants. My town is twice the size of Hays and I drive 1.5 hrs to the closest airport.
#39
New Hire
Joined: Nov 2019
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Call me cynical, but Kirby will use this crisis to his advantage. Don’t trust him!
I can see a scenario where a lot of 50 seaters are parked as he stated. Kirby then pleads to our MC, to give the company an equivalent number of 70/76 seaters to replace the lost feed, “otherwise we’ll have to furlough UAL pilots”.
It will be sold as a win-win (no furloughs) and the company gets their scope relief without spending a thin dime. Well, maybe they’ll throw a few bones in with it, but the damage will be done.
Hopefully it’s just my imagination, but after over two decades here, why would they let this crisis go to waste?
I can see a scenario where a lot of 50 seaters are parked as he stated. Kirby then pleads to our MC, to give the company an equivalent number of 70/76 seaters to replace the lost feed, “otherwise we’ll have to furlough UAL pilots”.
It will be sold as a win-win (no furloughs) and the company gets their scope relief without spending a thin dime. Well, maybe they’ll throw a few bones in with it, but the damage will be done.
Hopefully it’s just my imagination, but after over two decades here, why would they let this crisis go to waste?
#40
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Dec 2019
Posts: 407
Likes: 0
Right but if we can make money off of them, then we should. We've been doing that for years. Otherwise why would we fly to places like COS when they could just drive? To extort the market thats why
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
EngineOut
Regional
153
05-10-2017 10:12 AM




