![]() |
Originally Posted by flightmedic01
(Post 3126796)
I’ll sum up this dilemma with a sports analogy: It’s really difficult to come up with a winning strategy when the rules keep changing and the goal posts keep moving. Keep the contract intact, hope for the best, plan for the worst. We have a seniority system for a reason, and thats how I planned my life. Now, if you want to talk about changing the entire paradigm regarding the “seniority system” in place, thats an entirely different argument for another time. JMHO
|
"If the TA is accepted, the MEC then votes on whether or not to send it out for Membership Ratification (MR), in accordance with published MEC policy."
Someone help me make sure I understand this correctly. The MEC itself decides on whether or not to allow the general members to vote on approval of a TA? Sounds like they wouldn't agree to a TA unless they wanted it to pass, so why would they vote to allow it to out for a general vote at all? Also, if the TA is passed, and furloughs are mitigated, can you still volunteer for furlough? |
Originally Posted by JoePatroni
(Post 3126814)
Amen. Reading some of these posts reminds me why schools don’t allow dodgeball anymore.
The allusions to socialism I guess or not totally unwarranted… But the very idea of a union borrows a lot of its values from a group of people looking out for each other‘s needs and being able to both spread the successes and failures more evenly. If you can’t get on board for these basic tenants… How do you call yourself a strong union member? just to be very clear, I do not think you’re wrong for your stance, but it very obviously contradicts with the idea of the union. Could you perhaps acknowledge that maybe you land at a more individualistic end of the spectrum? for whatever it’s worth, I land slightly right of center nationally… I don’t particularly feel that my money is spread well on a national level. But on a localized union level, I think the leadership is efficient, well-intentioned and can effectively help others |
Originally Posted by serenitynow
(Post 3126690)
And I'm sure you were at the forefront of fight LOA 25 "carve out" for the UAL furloughee's. Oh wait, that didn't affect you so it was OK,.
And here we are. |
Originally Posted by duvie
(Post 3126824)
I think this is kind of odd… Because at least the thing I am espousing is not rabid self-preservation, which is a fairly juvenile tendency, but to rather make a choice out of solidarity that if some of your union brothers are suffering a lot of pain, that all of us at least suffer a little.
The allusions to socialism I guess or not totally unwarranted… But the very idea of a union borrows a lot of its values from a group of people looking out for each other‘s needs and being able to both spread the successes and failures more evenly. If you can’t get on board for these basic tenants… How do you call yourself a strong union member? The problem with “winging it” is when does it become too much? |
Originally Posted by ERAUAV8TR
(Post 3125538)
You talk big until you can’t find a job in that 6 months. Then what? Unemployment and food stamps. Might be flipping burgers for 1 to 5 years just for that 6 months at a higher rate? Give me a break!
1. not being aware of the cyclical nature of this job 2. not prepared for 5-10 years on the street. This is why we don't go to places like ERAU/UND and get ridiculous $300k degrees. We get other education in engineering/software/etc to diversify our skillset and we do side-hustles to diversify the income stream. Unless you're getting picked up a legacy at age 23, by the time you get to that legacy, you should have at least one side-hustle up and running to pay your bills in the "oh ****" situations like we're in now that most of us didn't see coming. |
Originally Posted by JoePatroni
(Post 3126829)
We have a contract in place that dictates how this should go, including furlough pay and voluntary reduced lines, it was negotiated over many years... not two weeks. The company has NEVER come to us in good times to renegotiate up. Ever.
The problem with “winging it” is when does it become too much? |
Maybe it’s time we re-examine the whole seniority system as a whole. Maybe it’s time to dismantle the system of oppression the seniority based system of capitalistic opportunism that is inherently unfair and unjust. True socialism requires adherence to shared rewards and shared pain. Workers of the world arise and demand a just system!
(For those that can’t already tell this is in jest....... this is in jest) Have a great day 😂 |
Originally Posted by JoePatroni
(Post 3126829)
We have a contract in place that dictates how this should go, including furlough pay and voluntary reduced lines, it was negotiated over many years... not two weeks. The company has NEVER come to us in good times to renegotiate up. Ever.
The problem with “winging it” is when does it become too much? maybe I’m overly optimistic, but I do not think this current MEC would send us a TA that was even remotely close to the trash that was forced to the United pilot group in the mid 2000s |
Originally Posted by Mudge
(Post 3126848)
Something about an unforeseen 65% reduction bookings comes to mind.
|
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:12 AM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands