![]() |
Originally Posted by CousinEddie
(Post 3136467)
Slam-click. Works fine for me. Well done Todd.
Todd probably underestimates the negative effect on unity and solidarity down the road. This will be a long term win for management. The upper two thirds won't be there. Heck, if we had done informational picketing when the 9 billion in stock was being bought that may have resulted in some positive unity. Todd not only has to rebuilt a contract negotiating plan and openness, but he now has to figure out how to rebuild the union. I have heard a few pilots mention they want to object to paying dues for religious reasons and just pay the maintenance fees (agency shop I think its called). As well as one on the jump seat stating he planned on mailing Todd his pin, but cut in half with a saw to reflect "half support." Not making that up. |
Originally Posted by jumppilot
(Post 3136447)
This TA gets 655 pilots out the door with the early out and buys us some time to see how the industry shakes out.
. My guess is 300 to 315. That's the window I think. We will see. Hope U R right. But that theoretical 655 number represents about 400 pilots who wanted to stay til 67 or 70 if they could. |
Originally Posted by biggun
(Post 3136622)
Everyone will likely slam click, not only the phone but the door.
Todd probably underestimates the negative effect on unity and solidarity down the road. This will be a long term win for management. The upper two thirds won't be there. Heck, if we had done informational picketing when the 9 billion in stock was being bought that may have resulted in some positive unity. Todd not only has to rebuilt a contract negotiating plan and openness, but he now has to figure out how to rebuild the union. I have heard a few pilots mention they want to object to paying dues for religious reasons and just pay the maintenance fees (agency shop I think its called). As well as one on the jump seat stating he planned on mailing Todd his pin, but cut in half with a saw to reflect "half support." Not making that up. If someone wants to be angry at work and just plain awful to work with then that’s a choice I suppose. I just don’t see what they’re getting out of it beyond looking for who they can create a tribal divide with to continue reigniting fabricated grievances. Very unfortunate and the idiocracy in the echo chambers of social media and forums has no place in the job. |
Originally Posted by Barley
(Post 3136633)
Negotiations don’t involve the consideration of those with the behavioral issues of a 4 year old.
If someone wants to be angry at work and just plain awful to work with then that’s a choice I suppose. Alienating your base is a huge mistake. The result is usually rebellion or apathy. Both of those outcomes are bad i am afraid. |
Originally Posted by ReadOnly7
(Post 3136331)
Yes. They will.
ESPECIALLY if this TA fails....because now the furloughees have been demonized for trying to be “parasites”, so screw ‘em. Rationalization is a STRONG influence on behavior. Admittedly, that is true on both sides of this discussion, but I still believe there will be plenty who pick up as much as possible. It’ll just be easier to “justify” it because of how angry the TA has made some people. |
Originally Posted by bottoms up
(Post 3136663)
yup If this passes I will pick up every hour I can for the duration of the TA...if nothing else..SPITE and because I can...
Yet another “all about me” temper tantrum..... https://media.giphy.com/media/3o7TKR...cExi/giphy.gif |
"We have to pass the TA, to see what's in the TA..."
- Nancy Insler |
Originally Posted by biggun
(Post 3136655)
No, but they do rely heavily on your base, and in that regard they rely very heavily on your most vocal and militant among you. Without the leverage they provide, the rest of the pilot group doesn't show up. I can't recall a single successful improved TA in airline history whereby that 10% to 15% core didn't provide the leverage the negotiating body needed to drive results.
Alienating your base is a huge mistake. The result is usually rebellion or apathy. Both of those outcomes are bad i am afraid. Now, there are certainly some good people that have gotten themselves enraged with this TA through all the social media and forum nonsense. Others are just plain self-serving or constantly needing a cover for their true intentions. I’m reminded of one question on a Q&A call of a captain that asked why we are letting the bottom 1/3rd vote because they’d obviously only vote ‘yes’ (which isn’t true). I thought satirically to myself, “Why should we let the top 1/3 vote because some spent decades squandering retirement and making poor financial decisions so they’ll obviously vote ‘no’, right?” Obviously that’s ridiculous, but just as ridiculous as that captain’s reasoning. That kind of “loud and militant” person doesn’t drive good union agenda or make this a better place. It’s just self-serving garbage. I do not find myself on that side of this, but to each their own. I’m just happy it’ll be done tomorrow. |
Originally Posted by bottoms up
(Post 3136663)
yup If this passes I will pick up every hour I can for the duration of the TA...if nothing else..SPITE and because I can...
|
Originally Posted by Viperstick
(Post 3136688)
"We have to pass the TA, to see what's in the TA..."
- Nancy Insler |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:15 AM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands