![]() |
It's Done
58% for, 42% against. Discuss.
|
Originally Posted by JetDoc
(Post 3136883)
58% for, 42% against. Discuss.
|
Originally Posted by JetDoc
(Post 3136883)
58% for, 42% against. Discuss.
|
Welcome to the new Mesa!
|
Originally Posted by Lex11incheSteel
(Post 3136895)
Welcome to the new Mesa!
|
We have voted to variabalize our pay. It’s an exciting time to be at United !
|
Originally Posted by Lex11incheSteel
(Post 3136895)
Welcome to the new Mesa!
|
Enjoy bankruptcy!
|
Originally Posted by SystemB
(Post 3136919)
Post-merger UAL is and will remain the best passenger airline to work for. This deal will help ensure that. Still a gamble, but odds are in our favor.
|
You voted for what you thought is best and am thankful some of my close friends keep their jobs.
Best of luck to you all. |
Originally Posted by SystemB
(Post 3136919)
Post-merger UAL is and will remain the best passenger airline to work for. This deal will help ensure that. Still a gamble, but odds are in our favor.
So the constant barrage of “gOt yEr Stuff in” will continue? Sweet! |
How was the airline picture a year ago? Pretty good I’d say.
How about some optimism? Right now over 170 different vaccine formulas are going through trials. Yes, a way to go, also they will never be 100% effective. Then we have this election to get past. The picture could be VASTLY different next June. That’s a large part of my mindset, adjust as needed later. |
Originally Posted by mmm123
(Post 3136938)
Enjoy bankruptcy!
|
Originally Posted by MasterOfPuppets
(Post 3136956)
so you taking the EO?
They'll return here to either gloat that this TA didn't work or will develop amnesia WRT to the TA and EO. |
Originally Posted by SystemB
(Post 3136919)
Post-merger UAL is and will remain the best passenger airline to work for. This deal will help ensure that. Still a gamble, but odds are in our favor.
|
Originally Posted by MasterOfPuppets
(Post 3136956)
so you taking the EO?
|
Originally Posted by mmm123
(Post 3136962)
Will be gone before ch-11 hits but hey thanks for asking, go back to celebrating.
18% less days for the middle 50% less for the bottom. and the tiers are fluid, especially with potentially 655 new members to the top two. Not to mention some of my WB buddies who’ll bid to a lower tier and commute only twice a month seniority honored and we are all in this together |
Originally Posted by Andy
(Post 3136959)
Expect crickets from those that have been negative on the TA and indicated they'll take an EO.
They'll return here to either gloat that this TA didn't work or will develop amnesia WRT to the TA and EO. |
Originally Posted by duvie
(Post 3136972)
10% less days worked for the top
18% less days for the middle 50% less for the bottom. and the tiers are fluid, especially with potentially 655 new members to the top two. Not to mention some of my WB buddies who’ll bid to a lower tier and commute only twice a month seniority honored and we are all in this together |
Originally Posted by duvie
(Post 3136972)
seniority honored and we are all in this together |
What were the detailed terms
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
Originally Posted by CousinEddie
(Post 3136981)
Wrong. PVSL2 pilots, despite not flying do not create tier move-ups until they turn 65 (or 24 months from DOS, whichever comes first). So even if 655 sign up, it won’t move the tiers at all.
|
With the savings, does this mean the inflight service will get better?
|
Originally Posted by jcool734
(Post 3136984)
What were the detailed terms
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
Originally Posted by pilotgolfer
(Post 3136961)
come cut my grass. 😁
|
Originally Posted by opt0712
(Post 3136989)
With the savings, does this mean the inflight service will get better?
Sent from my SM-N986U using Tapatalk |
Originally Posted by duvie
(Post 3136972)
10% less days worked for the top
18% less days for the middle 50% less for the bottom. and the tiers are fluid, especially with potentially 655 new members to the top two. Not to mention some of my WB buddies who’ll bid to a lower tier and commute only twice a month seniority honored and we are all in this together "Days less worked", that is not true. Oh, if only it were that simple. 2:20 Wait till your vacation month rolls around and do the math. Keeping the vacation multiplier at 2:20 will be a paycut for many pilots. Remember the 2:20 comes from 70 hours MPG divided by 30 days. Why did the mulitplier not change to the commensurate MPG? Ah, its just the fine print. Who reads the fine print anyway? And when is going from 70 to 60 a 10% cut? |
Originally Posted by mmm123
(Post 3136976)
I have been negative Andy but have never indicated taking an early out.. I'm still comfortable saying I don't think it will work, but when it doesn't I won't be gloating. I don't get pulled in to the this will have us in better position when it all turns around, I can't believe they sold the group on that statement. I am okay if I'm totally wrong but I will be surprised.Time will tell.
There was another person complaining that he just missed the age limit for the previous early out. Will be interesting to see what he does. Having been furloughed twice from the lazy U, I know how bad it sucks. I'm glad we were able to keep these guys on property a while longer. At this point, it all depends on how fast people will return to flying. And that's going to depend on how long it takes for Covid to be done. I expect at least one of the vaccines in phase 3 trials to be fairly effective for Covid. |
Originally Posted by SystemB
(Post 3136919)
Post-merger UAL is and will remain the best passenger airline to work for. This deal will help ensure that. Still a gamble, but odds are in our favor.
|
Originally Posted by mmm123
(Post 3136976)
I have been negative Andy but have never indicated taking an early out.. I'm still comfortable saying I don't think it will work, but when it doesn't I won't be gloating. I don't get pulled in to the this will have us in better position when it all turns around, I can't believe they sold the group on that statement. I am okay if I'm totally wrong but I will be surprised.Time will tell.
In your(or any other "no" pilot's) opinion what is the absolute rock bottom outcome of this agreement? |
Originally Posted by ACEssXfer
(Post 3137181)
What exactly would be the indicator of it working or not?
In your(or any other "no" pilot's) opinion what is the absolute rock bottom outcome of this agreement? |
Originally Posted by APCbot
(Post 3137143)
Have you heard of this company called Delta?
Sent from my SM-N986U using Tapatalk |
Originally Posted by Chimpy
(Post 3136947)
So the constant barrage of “gOt yEr Stuff in” will continue? Sweet!
|
Originally Posted by APCbot
(Post 3137143)
Have you heard of this company called Delta?
|
This turd will fester for years. I invite the gloaters to come back in 5-10 and revisit the discussion.
|
Originally Posted by SystemB
(Post 3137236)
The widebody ratio here has been incredible for everyone’s career advancement and QOL. Yeah, heard of Delta. I have nothing against that place. I have enjoyed UAL greatly since the merger and wouldn’t trade some things we have here for more $; hopefully things will recover soon for United, Delta and everyone else.
|
Originally Posted by mmm123
(Post 3137193)
I think the bottom is ch-11, I believe we were on our way and I think this will move us there quicker. I also think the divide among the pilots will be worse than people think. But hey JMO.
|
Originally Posted by oldmako
(Post 3137319)
This turd will fester for years. I invite the gloaters to come back in 5-10 and revisit the discussion.
|
Originally Posted by oldmako
(Post 3137319)
This turd will fester for years. I invite the gloaters to come back in 5-10 and revisit the discussion.
furthermore, if United is not profitable enough in the next 5 years to trigger the 5% increase in pay, (along with keeping additional scope protections, high earning WB FOs and captains not taking a $3000+ /month hit if they develop unforeseen medical issues, etc.), Then I don’t think any of us will be doing very well and it won’t be the fault of the TA. if the temporary duration of this TA is ignored somehow, or the provisions follow us into bankruptcy, PM me and I’ll buy you a steak dinner and bourbon of your choice. If I’m right, we all win and I’ll still buy you dinner ;-) |
Originally Posted by duvie
(Post 3137469)
if we furlough less than 2007 people (thus allowing the TA to live out its full 2 years) during the worst air travel demand downturn since most of us were born, I would consider that a win.
furthermore, if United is not profitable enough in the next 5 years to trigger the 5% increase in pay, (along with keeping additional scope protections, high earning WB FOs and captains not taking a $3000+ /month hit if they develop unforeseen medical issues, etc.), Then I don’t think any of us will be doing very well and it won’t be the fault of the TA. if the temporary duration of this TA is ignored somehow, or the provisions follow us into bankruptcy, PM me and I’ll buy you a steak dinner and bourbon of your choice. If I’m right, we all win and I’ll still buy you dinner ;-) |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:31 AM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands