$3.5 Trillion doesn’t just grow on trees!
#211
States don’t feel rebuked? Then why is the SALT deduction being temporarily returned? Did some mountain have a conversation with a river and decide the SALT deduction was misapplied economic theory? He’s talking about governments, not borders. You’re being pedantic.
His suggestion is for the states to stop sheltering their wealthy at the expense of other states. His suggestion is that two people earning $500,000 in the same country pay the same federal taxes. It’s not rocket science; it’s equal.
“Tax the rich.” Just because it’s a slogan of the left doesn’t mean it doesn’t have application from the conservative perspective of government. The fact of the matter is that the rich pay a massively disproportionate amount of taxes. They are already taxed exorbitantly and most are proud to pay. But when one is paying less than his/her peer, that’s an injustice. Just make it equal. SALT deduction limits are literally shields that allow high earners to not pay “their fair share.”
All this to say, you don’t understand the the opposition very well and don’t have a handle on their views.
His suggestion is for the states to stop sheltering their wealthy at the expense of other states. His suggestion is that two people earning $500,000 in the same country pay the same federal taxes. It’s not rocket science; it’s equal.
“Tax the rich.” Just because it’s a slogan of the left doesn’t mean it doesn’t have application from the conservative perspective of government. The fact of the matter is that the rich pay a massively disproportionate amount of taxes. They are already taxed exorbitantly and most are proud to pay. But when one is paying less than his/her peer, that’s an injustice. Just make it equal. SALT deduction limits are literally shields that allow high earners to not pay “their fair share.”
All this to say, you don’t understand the the opposition very well and don’t have a handle on their views.
#213
Secondly, the narrative of low-income states bearing the financial burden of bloated social programs in liberal havens makes for great outrage porn, but the data doesn’t support that story. In very general terms, red states are the ones getting the most federal subsidies where high-tax blues tend to be the ones bridging that gap.
That’s not to generally champion these states, either- the conversation is far more complex- but this idea that KY coal miners are paying for gender reassignment surgeries of illegal immigrants in CA is just rubbish.
#214
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Mar 2018
Posts: 2,352
This comment is so riddled with misunderstanding of the situation in so few words. First of all, high tax states are not sheltering their wealthy- they are taxing them. Through SALT deductions, the federal government shelters those individuals from a portion of their federal tax burden. The states collect the same amount in taxes from each individual whether or not they are able to claim the deduction on their federal taxes. SALT only indirectly impacts the amount of total state taxes collected to the extent it encourages high tax payers to move into or out of the state, respectively. Thus, while changes in SALT deduction allowances can have significant impacts on the individuals utilizing them, they may or may not have any measurable impact on the financials of the states in question.
Secondly, the narrative of low-income states bearing the financial burden of bloated social programs in liberal havens makes for great outrage porn, but the data doesn’t support that story. In very general terms, red states are the ones getting the most federal subsidies where high-tax blues tend to be the ones bridging that gap.
That’s not to generally champion these states, either- the conversation is far more complex- but this idea that KY coal miners are paying for gender reassignment surgeries of illegal immigrants in CA is just rubbish.
Secondly, the narrative of low-income states bearing the financial burden of bloated social programs in liberal havens makes for great outrage porn, but the data doesn’t support that story. In very general terms, red states are the ones getting the most federal subsidies where high-tax blues tend to be the ones bridging that gap.
That’s not to generally champion these states, either- the conversation is far more complex- but this idea that KY coal miners are paying for gender reassignment surgeries of illegal immigrants in CA is just rubbish.
#215
Wrong. CA residents collectively receive less money from the federal government than they pay in federal taxes. So mathematically speaking, while some individual CA taxpayers are certainly receiving more than they contribute, that money is coming from other CA taxpayers- not outside of the state. KY residents on the other hand receive more federal dollars collectively than they pay in. So some of that money has to come from states like CA that operate at a surplus. In general, federal money flows from high income blue states into low income red states.
#216
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Mar 2006
Position: guppy CA
Posts: 5,160
Wrong. CA residents collectively receive less money from the federal government than they pay in federal taxes. So mathematically speaking, while some individual CA taxpayers are certainly receiving more than they contribute, that money is coming from other CA taxpayers- not outside of the state. KY residents on the other hand receive more federal dollars collectively than they pay in. So some of that money has to come from states like CA that operate at a surplus. In general, federal money flows from high income blue states into low income red states.
In the past, all the 'who gets more federal bucks' always, always, always has included military, national park, and other miscellaneous federal spending in each state. Those numbers got very bent when, a couple of decades ago, CA pushed to have most of their military bases closed.
When military spending is included, military bases located in low cost areas survived the last BRAC much better than military bases in high cost areas.
Bottom line on such stats (which states get more money) is that figures don't lie but liars can figure.
#217
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Mar 2018
Posts: 2,352
Wrong. CA residents collectively receive less money from the federal government than they pay in federal taxes. So mathematically speaking, while some individual CA taxpayers are certainly receiving more than they contribute, that money is coming from other CA taxpayers- not outside of the state. KY residents on the other hand receive more federal dollars collectively than they pay in. So some of that money has to come from states like CA that operate at a surplus. In general, federal money flows from high income blue states into low income red states.
#218
This comment is so riddled with misunderstanding of the situation in so few words. First of all, high tax states are not sheltering their wealthy- they are taxing them. Through SALT deductions, the federal government shelters those individuals from a portion of their federal tax burden. The states collect the same amount in taxes from each individual whether or not they are able to claim the deduction on their federal taxes. SALT only indirectly impacts the amount of total state taxes collected to the extent it encourages high tax payers to move into or out of the state, respectively. Thus, while changes in SALT deduction allowances can have significant impacts on the individuals utilizing them, they may or may not have any measurable impact on the financials of the states in question.
Secondly, the narrative of low-income states bearing the financial burden of bloated social programs in liberal havens makes for great outrage porn, but the data doesn’t support that story. In very general terms, red states are the ones getting the most federal subsidies where high-tax blues tend to be the ones bridging that gap.
That’s not to generally champion these states, either- the conversation is far more complex- but this idea that KY coal miners are paying for gender reassignment surgeries of illegal immigrants in CA is just rubbish.
Secondly, the narrative of low-income states bearing the financial burden of bloated social programs in liberal havens makes for great outrage porn, but the data doesn’t support that story. In very general terms, red states are the ones getting the most federal subsidies where high-tax blues tend to be the ones bridging that gap.
That’s not to generally champion these states, either- the conversation is far more complex- but this idea that KY coal miners are paying for gender reassignment surgeries of illegal immigrants in CA is just rubbish.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post