$3.5 Trillion doesn’t just grow on trees!
https://www.cnbc.com/2021/09/13/hous...e-wealthy.html
Not good for many of us… ”Democrats’ legislation would end the mega-backdoor Roth by prohibiting all after-tax contributions in workplace plans and prohibiting after-tax IRA contributions from being converted to a Roth account.” |
These changes are for people making over $400k single filer or $450k joint and with over $10 million in retirement. I’m guessing that’s next to nobody frequenting these forums. In any event, unlikely to pass.
|
Originally Posted by Barley
(Post 3294929)
These changes are for people making over $400k single filer or $450k joint and with over $10 million in retirement. I’m guessing that’s next to nobody frequenting these forums. In any event, unlikely to pass.
There were some provisions in there about after-tax contributions that are converted to Roth designation, regardless of income. That would affect a lot of people here. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
Originally Posted by Anderson
(Post 3294942)
There were some provisions in there about after-tax contributions that are converted to Roth designation, regardless of income. That would affect a lot of people here.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk ”Furthermore, this section prohibits all employee after-tax contributions in qualified plans and prohibits after-tax IRA contributions from being converted to Roth regardless of income level, effective for distributions, transfers, and contributions made after December 31, 2021.” |
Eh, that part is of little importantance to me as there are better strategies than after-tax 401k contributions. The alarmist part (which applies to almost nobody) was saying it ends backdoor roth. In any event, no point in arguing over it because it’s unlikely to get traction; however, it made for some great clickbait nonsense that most only read a subject line about.
|
Originally Posted by Barley
(Post 3294944)
Eh, that part is of little importantance to me as there are better strategies than after-tax 401k contributions. The alarmist part (which applies to almost nobody) was saying it ends backdoor roth. In any event, no point in arguing over it because it’s unlikely to get traction; however, it made for some great clickbait nonsense that most only read a subject line about.
The ability to save up to 58k in your 401K by making after-tax contributions and subsequently converting those dollars to Roth (if your plan offers that option) is a huge benefit and advantage. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
Originally Posted by Anderson
(Post 3294951)
The ability to save up to 58k in your 401K by making after-tax contributions and subsequently converting those dollars to Roth (if your plan offers that option) is a huge benefit and advantage.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Let’s have another multi-page thread over nothing though. 🍿 |
Originally Posted by Barley
(Post 3294953)
I didn’t say it wasn’t.
Let’s have another multi-page thread over nothing though. [emoji897] One could make an inference that you don’t think it’s a huge benefit. Otherwise, why would you regard the loss of a huge tax benefit as “of little importance?” In any case, what is a better strategy than having many thousands of dollars contributed every year, and growing tax free? Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
Originally Posted by Barley
(Post 3294944)
Eh, that part is of little importantance to me as there are better strategies than after-tax 401k contributions. The alarmist part (which applies to almost nobody) was saying it ends backdoor roth. In any event, no point in arguing over it because it’s unlikely to get traction; however, it made for some great clickbait nonsense that most only read a subject line about.
Not really clickbait, read the article - it applies to every non first-year pilot (and some of us when we were first-year). This provision (as quoted) is not limited to income >$400k, the specific mega backdoor section bans ALL after-tax contributions… It may not pass (I sure hope it doesn’t) but being aware that’s it’s in the bill should get your attention, at least a little bit. |
Originally Posted by Barley
(Post 3294944)
Eh, that part is of little importantance to me as there are better strategies than after-tax 401k contributions. The alarmist part (which applies to almost nobody) was saying it ends backdoor roth. In any event, no point in arguing over it because it’s unlikely to get traction; however, it made for some great clickbait nonsense that most only read a subject line about.
|
We’ll see what happens. Obama tried to go after 529’s tax status and was humbled at the smack down that received.
|
If your wife/husband has a job you are hitting those income limits pretty easily. They get people on board with ideas like this with "dont worry we are paying for it with those peoples money" and then they keep spending and soon the definition of "those" people quickly includes everyone to pay their share. Killing the after tax to roth conversion in 401ks will severely impact anyone who wanted to retire before 59.5 yrs of age.
|
Originally Posted by ThumbsUp
(Post 3294943)
… and it actually affects the younger crowd the most since they have the largest amount to contribute to the PRAP after-tax.
”Furthermore, this section prohibits all employee after-tax contributions in qualified plans and prohibits after-tax IRA contributions from being converted to Roth regardless of income level, effective for distributions, transfers, and contributions made after December 31, 2021.” |
Originally Posted by TOGALOCK
(Post 3294986)
Was this quote removed in the article update? I don’t see anything in there about the proposed change affecting Roth contributions. Just the conversions.
https://waysandmeans.house.gov/sites/democrats.waysandmeans.house.gov/files/documents/SubtitleISxS.pdf I have no idea about any of this stuff. I take the company max and I take the max I can per year into the Roth 401k. |
Tax the rich!!!!!
|
Originally Posted by ERAUAV8TR
(Post 3295078)
Tax the rich!!!!!
|
Originally Posted by ThumbsUp
(Post 3295089)
Yeah! Screw those new hires!
New hires? you sound greedy must have voted no |
Originally Posted by ERAUAV8TR
(Post 3295095)
Rich in bill is top 1 percent and those that make 450,000 dollars or more.
New hires? you sound greedy must have voted no |
Originally Posted by ThumbsUp
(Post 3295097)
The provisions in that bill that affect us are primarily for those earning less than $240k/year. Which is a lot of us. And the degree to which it affects you increases as your income goes down.
READ something before you pontificate about it. Maybe you’ll learn something… |
Originally Posted by LJ Driver
(Post 3295196)
I love the experts on here that haven’t read the bill, or even the article, and assume if you make less than $400/450k then this doesn’t apply. It most certainly does.
READ something before you pontificate about it. Maybe you’ll learn something… |
Originally Posted by Fresh
(Post 3295197)
The mega back door Roth applies to all income ranges. This is a big deal. I’ll be calling my representatives.
lol guy still believes his government actually works for him. How cute. |
Originally Posted by Fresh
(Post 3295197)
The mega back door Roth applies to all income ranges. This is a big deal. I’ll be calling my representatives.
Definitely. Thanks LJ Driver . I would never have seen this steaming pile otherwise. Although, I live in a red district, so they wouldn't be voting yes for it anyway. |
Originally Posted by Anderson
(Post 3294951)
The ability to save up to 58k in your 401K by making after-tax contributions and subsequently converting those dollars to Roth (if your plan offers that option) is a huge benefit and advantage.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
Originally Posted by ERAUAV8TR
(Post 3295078)
Tax the rich!!!!!
|
Originally Posted by Fresh
(Post 3295197)
The mega back door Roth applies to all income ranges. This is a big deal. I’ll be calling my representatives.
|
Originally Posted by Xtreme87
(Post 3295215)
lol guy still believes his government actually works for him. How cute.
|
30 years in this business, all I ever hear is that Dems are gonna take my money (and guns), yet we always get the phat contracts when Dems are in the White House. They nominate liberal, labor friendly NMB members that get assigned to our contract negotiations. Record breaking Contract 2000 is the best example. Signed under President Clinton. Contract 2012 and Extension 2016, both during Obama’s run are other examples. Of course we didn’t get one under Trump. Just a concessionary LOA and an all time high record annual deficit in 2020. He made Obama look downright thrifty in his handling of the financial crisis. Smokin Joe did not disappoint. He has nominated a Teamster lawyer to the NMB…. Lol. So get ready for our next contract.
And let’s talk about the stock market runs during Mr. Clinton and Obama’s terms. Wow. These gentlemen own the #1 and #2 best stock market percentage gains of modern times. Cha freakin’ Ching, baby!! And I still have my guns!! Lol. For the life of me, I can’t figure out why anyone would vote for more “lost decade” Rep presidents. It’s been my experience that my money grows best during Dem president’s terms. Both in contractual gains and B-fund earnings. Oh look, the S&P is up 20% year to date during Joe’s disastrous first year. Saddle up… 3 more years to go. Ridin with Biden. 😎 c |
Originally Posted by guppie
(Post 3295282)
30 years in this business, all I ever hear is that Dems are gonna take my money (and guns),
|
I do all my 401k contributions after tax (roth)
Would this effect me? I'm obviously not doing any backdoor conversions |
Originally Posted by Aero1900
(Post 3295301)
I do all my 401k contributions after tax (roth)
Would this effect me? I'm obviously not doing any backdoor conversions |
Originally Posted by Aero1900
(Post 3295301)
I do all my 401k contributions after tax (roth)
Would this effect me? I'm obviously not doing any backdoor conversions If you ever want to add more than just the elective deferral (2021=19500) of your own money, it affects you. |
I read if you are vaccinated and wear 3 masks you can still do the back door Roth regardless of income level. It’s on page 69. Also Miata based EFTs will have tax free earnings, but only if you vote yes. These tax laws are complicated.
|
Originally Posted by Barley
(Post 3294929)
These changes are for people making over $400k single filer or $450k joint and with over $10 million in retirement. I’m guessing that’s next to nobody frequenting these forums. In any event, unlikely to pass.
|
Originally Posted by imthecaptainnow
(Post 3295436)
Problem with this is a majority of people don't make over $400k per year aka middle class.
|
Originally Posted by emersonbiguns
(Post 3295450)
What do you think the income of the "middle class" is?
this is a tax on the middle class, not the rich. Only a change to the rate in long term capital gains will change that. |
Originally Posted by PNWFlyer
(Post 3295491)
I still remember the best quote ever from The Cosby Show… “we are not rich because we work for our money. Rich is when your money works for you.”
this is a tax on the middle class, not the rich. Only a change to the rate in long term capital gains will change that. |
Originally Posted by Aero1900
(Post 3295502)
I think they did want to up the capital gains tax. To a minimum of 25% I believe
|
Originally Posted by CBreezy
(Post 3295525)
I think one of the big things they wanted to stop was the what the PayPal creater did by taking his Roth with $2000 in 99 to $15B today
|
Originally Posted by ThumbsUp
(Post 3295531)
Yep, that’s in there too. It’s basically a crush to retirement plans in general outside of pensions.
|
Originally Posted by CBreezy
(Post 3295541)
A crush that prevents the extraordinarily wealthy from utilizing resources no one else has to shelter billions of dollars tax free. The middle class generally won't feel anything with the Roth IRA provisions
|
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:09 PM. |
User Alert System provided by
Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) -
vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2024 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Website Copyright ©2000 - 2017 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands