Airline Pilot Central Forums

Airline Pilot Central Forums (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/)
-   United (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/united/)
-   -   Vacancy 22-04V (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/united/135620-vacancy-22-04v.html)

GPullR 12-06-2021 05:27 PM


Originally Posted by worstpilotever (Post 3331221)
I believe it will be called the A321 and is supposed to show up in 2023 or 2024.

If you don't want to go high, fast, or carry full tanks,people and bags I guess so.

Sent from my SM-N986U using Tapatalk

Airhoss 12-06-2021 05:57 PM


Originally Posted by Guppydriver95 (Post 3331199)
you have to be joking. How could a guy like that not get psych evaled and medically grounded?

Probably for the same reason that the UFO guy who truly believed that spaceships refueled in lenticular coulds never got fired. Or the current Sasquatch guy or the new world order lizard people guy or those guys who actually put money into the ISL law suit thinking they had a case.

Dave Fitzgerald 12-06-2021 05:58 PM


Originally Posted by Sniper66 (Post 3331761)
FYI they are looking for used 767-300 as well

Goal to have by 2025
100 756s ( mix 757-300 , 757-200, 767-300, 767-400)
100 787s
75 777s ( A models 19 of them will be gone )

I seriously doubt the A's will be gone before a replacement is found. Sorry to burst your bubble, the A's have one of the best seat mile costs of the entire airline--and the A350's aren't going to happen, certainly not before 2025.

In fact, If I were in charge, there's a bunch of used PW 777-200ER's could be gotten very cheap.

guppie 12-06-2021 08:12 PM


Originally Posted by Airhoss (Post 3331957)
or those guys who actually put money into the ISL law suit thinking they had a case.


Lawyers have to make a living, too. :D

BeatNavy 12-06-2021 09:31 PM


Originally Posted by HuggyU2 (Post 3330953)
Has ALPA accomplished a radiation study of any sort? If not, the membership should insist on it. If they have, would someone post a link?

The pilots in the "high-altitude" aviation community are considered "radiation workers" due to the amount of exposure they get. U-2 flights are now flown with dosimeters to allow tracking of the radiation that each pilot receives. Radiation levels are monitored daily and if the forecast is that they will be high due to solar flare activity or whatever, the flight will be cancelled.

Back around 2009, about 80 of us volunteered for a brain MRI study to try to help correlate the damage being done in the form of brain lesions. This was after we had a spate of serious injuries and one near fatality. Was radiation a contributing factor along with the high cabin altitudes we were experiencing? I don't believe they ever concluded it was... but the radiation is definitely there.

Is flying in the FL350 range for 15 hours, including a pole transit, significant WRT the amount of millirems? The answer should be known by now. And if it isn't, someone needs to get on it.

It is not my intent to derail the discussion with a thread drift. We can certainly start a new thread if anyone wants to discuss health effect of long-haul flying.

https://www.cdc.gov/niosh/topics/air...radiation.html
  • The National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements reported that aircrew have the largest average annual effective dose (3.07 mSv) of all US radiation-exposed workers. 1 Other estimates of annual aircrew cosmic radiation exposure range from 0.2 to 5 mSv per year.

https://www.faa.gov/data_research/re...media/0316.pdf

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/artic...s-of-radiation I’ve read a lot more about foreign unions making noise about it than ALPA. Same goes for fumes.


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:59 PM.


Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands