![]() |
Quigley
Bryan Quigley “decides” to retire or perhaps was shown the door. Million dollar jobs are hard to find.
|
AMF
filler |
I’m excited about Marc. Has done previous work for ALPA. Did a good job at TK during COVID.
|
Originally Posted by Beewatcher2
(Post 3619821)
Bryan Quigley “decides” to retire or perhaps was shown the door. Million dollar jobs are hard to find.
|
Or maybe he just is tired of everything and is ready to retire. It's probably been a stressful couple of years in that position with pandemic, hiring, negotiations, etc.
Marc sounds like a good replacement. |
Originally Posted by WhisperJet
(Post 3619861)
Or maybe he just is tired of everything and is ready to retire. It's probably been a stressful couple of years in that position with pandemic, hiring, negotiations, etc.
Marc sounds like a good replacement. |
Originally Posted by hummingbear
(Post 3619853)
Won’t claim to know either way but the timing is interesting. Turns out “overpromise & underdeliver” may not be the best strategy for longevity. Wonder if the BOD is getting frustrated w/ failures at the top & who else may be feeling the heat.
Also new position isn’t the position that Bryan had. It’s a watered down version. |
“I have made the decision to retire from United effective May 15…
There is, however, an important piece that remains to ensure our success - we need to achieve an industry-leading contract for our pilots. In order to provide expertise, leadership and continuity, I will transition to an advisory role where I am dedicated to support pilot negotiations.“ Essentially lays out that negotiations will continue beyond his May 15th retirement date. Prove me wrong. |
Originally Posted by SeamusTheHound
(Post 3619929)
“I have made the decision to retire from United effective May 15…
There is, however, an important piece that remains to ensure our success - we need to achieve an industry-leading contract for our pilots. In order to provide expertise, leadership and continuity, I will transition to an advisory role where I am dedicated to support pilot negotiations.“ Essentially lays out that negotiations will continue beyond his May 15th retirement date. Prove me wrong. |
Originally Posted by hummingbear;[url=tel:3619853
3619853[/url]]Won’t claim to know either way but the timing is interesting. Turns out “overpromise & underdeliver” may not be the best strategy for longevity. Wonder if the BOD is getting frustrated w/ failures at the top & who else may be feeling the heat.
|
Originally Posted by 500RVR
(Post 3619934)
I would hope so what’s on the table now is unacceptable. AA looks like they may have a deal in the coming weeks. If they pattern up above DAL that’s good for us .
|
Originally Posted by Hedley
(Post 3619946)
We don’t know what is really on the table, just a partial list of vague bullet points. Depending on the final language, the negotiating notes email points could be really good or really bad. Without knowing what we’re actually dealing with, we can’t determine if it is acceptable or not.
|
Originally Posted by 500RVR
(Post 3619996)
Either way if AA exceeds or at least truly matches DAL better for us.
|
Originally Posted by Hedley
(Post 3620006)
Id agree, but we don’t know their final language either. People around here tend to get spun up over “what ifs” and rumors rather than wait and analyze actual factual data. I think that is what makes APC entertaining. It’s not a place for solving world problems, it’s the aviation themed Jerry Springer show.
|
Originally Posted by serce
(Post 3620085)
What we do know for a fact is that reserve will remain below industry standard.
|
Originally Posted by Hedley
(Post 3620113)
Depends on the language. Take FSB for example. If we still have it, but it’s voluntary with add pay, that would be a major improvement. Reserve assignment rules, transparency, more days off, higher guarantee…… it’s all about the language and until that’s known, we don’t know if it’s leading or lagging. Also, there are other more important sections to focus on than always coming back to reserve. Yes our reserve rules are bad and need fixed, but we need to focus on the bigger sections too. All anyone talks about here is reserve.
|
So you mean that reserve would actually be a “choice”?
Seniority scoffs at this upstart blasphemy. |
Originally Posted by Hedley
(Post 3620113)
Depends on the language. Take FSB for example. If we still have it, but it’s voluntary with add pay, that would be a major improvement. Reserve assignment rules, transparency, more days off, higher guarantee…… it’s all about the language and until that’s known, we don’t know if it’s leading or lagging. Also, there are other more important sections to focus on than always coming back to reserve. Yes our reserve rules are bad and need fixed, but we need to focus on the bigger sections too. All anyone talks about here is reserve.
|
Originally Posted by serce
(Post 3620139)
10 AM show on day one, Jetblue is 1400. That alone makes it non-commutable for a large percentage of the pilot group. 30 percent of the pilot group is on reserve. Reserve is not a choice, it's a matter of bad luck. I spent 14 years on reserve and it was not by choice.
|
Originally Posted by MasterOfPuppets
(Post 3619941)
Not my story to tell…….but this ^^^^^^isnt the reason.
|
Originally Posted by 500RVR;[url=tel:3619914
3619914]Heard it was for a serious health issue.
Also new position isn’t the position that Bryan had. It’s a watered down version. |
Originally Posted by Hedley
(Post 3620113)
All anyone talks about here is reserve.
Other than pay, which will be industry leading (even mgt knows that), what "other bigger items" are of concern to you? Believe me, you will get buy-in from the "fix reserve crowd". But, it won't be, "Do your stuff and then if any "negotiating pie" is left over sweep the crumbs towards fixing reserve" which the senior guys appear to tout.. |
Originally Posted by Race Bannon
(Post 3620269)
Other than pay, which will be industry leading (even mgt knows that), what "other bigger items" are of concern to you? Believe me, you will get buy-in from the "fix reserve crowd". But, it won't be, "Do your stuff and then if any "negotiating pie" is left over sweep the crumbs towards fixing reserve" which the senior guys appear to tout.. Increased retirement contributions- B fund, 401(k), etc. Increased LTD cap Increased sick leave accrual, including better rapid accrual when depleted Increased vacation credit Increased training credit- training pays like a flight Increased trip protections/more stringent reassignment rules Significant add pay for trip extensions/ reassignments Increased accountability rules on scheduling for staffing levels- make it easier to drop and trade trips Tighter rules establishing the G-line Overs protected on a per leg basis Rates that exceed Delta Me too clause Improved trip rigs for long layovers, airport appreciation, etc. Premium pay at 100% minimum Instructors at TK paid what they can hold Furlough protections And yes, our reserve rules need significant improvements. I’m not going to get everything that I want, and those focused on reserve rules won’t either. It will be a compromise and we’ll have an opportunity to vote on the package in its entirety……….eventually. |
Originally Posted by Hedley
(Post 3620292)
No scope creep, tighten the language
Increased retirement contributions- B fund, 401(k), etc. Increased LTD cap Increased sick leave accrual, including better rapid accrual when depleted Increased vacation credit Increased training credit- training pays like a flight Increased trip protections/more stringent reassignment rules Significant add pay for trip extensions/ reassignments Increased accountability rules on scheduling for staffing levels- make it easier to drop and trade trips Tighter rules establishing the G-line Overs protected on a per leg basis Rates that exceed Delta Me too clause Improved trip rigs for long layovers, airport appreciation, etc. Premium pay at 100% minimum Instructors at TK paid what they can hold Furlough protections And yes, our reserve rules need significant improvements. I’m not going to get everything that I want, and those focused on reserve rules won’t either. It will be a compromise and we’ll have an opportunity to vote on the package in its entirety……….eventually. |
Originally Posted by serce
(Post 3620301)
The problem is that reserve rules received no improvement.
Agreed. A lot of guys lost their jobs because of it too(rightfully so). Hopefully the direction from the new MEC to the old /current NC chairman is more in touch this time around. We still have posters that feel that improving things for the senior guys is more important than bringing reserve(the whole package) up to industry standard. |
Originally Posted by serce
(Post 3620301)
The problem is that reserve rules received no improvement.
From the last negotiations notes: Agreed: No involuntary assignment before 10 a.m. on Day 1 of a reserve block Elimination of flexible day off (FDOs) for Global categories Option to split holy days off (HDOs) into two shorter periods in Global categories Voluntary Long Call Reserve lines where short call (SC) and field standby (FSB) is only through aggressive pick-up (APU) Reserves maintain original scheduled release time when deviating Increased restrictions on assigning Visiting Reserves All unused Short Call assignments receive 1 hour of additional minimum pay guarantee (MPG) Trip trades between reserves Reserve day-for-day trades Add Pay for reserve rolled days off Add Pay for late build Short Calls Improved release times if unused on last day of reserve Add Pay for voluntary assignments that start prior to 10 a.m. on Day 1 Open Items: Increase in number of reserve days off Increase in the daily value of reserve guarantee Pilot option to add an additional reserve day in high LPA months Short Call caps Elimination of FDOs for Basic categories Elimination of involuntary FSB Improved voluntary reserve options Improved Long Call and Short Call callout times Increased pay for voluntary FSB Remove crew desk discretion from reserve assignment order Incentives to avoid involuntarily rolling of reserve days off |
Originally Posted by Hedley
(Post 3620307)
There are improvements agreed to, and open. Until it’s finalized, we can’t really judge it. The reserve first crowd isn’t going to get everything that they want, and the reserve last crowd won’t either.
From the last negotiations notes: Agreed: No involuntary assignment before 10 a.m. on Day 1 of a reserve block Elimination of flexible day off (FDOs) for Global categories Option to split holy days off (HDOs) into two shorter periods in Global categories Voluntary Long Call Reserve lines where short call (SC) and field standby (FSB) is only through aggressive pick-up (APU) Reserves maintain original scheduled release time when deviating Increased restrictions on assigning Visiting Reserves All unused Short Call assignments receive 1 hour of additional minimum pay guarantee (MPG) Trip trades between reserves Reserve day-for-day trades Add Pay for reserve rolled days off Add Pay for late build Short Calls Improved release times if unused on last day of reserve Add Pay for voluntary assignments that start prior to 10 a.m. on Day 1 Open Items: Increase in number of reserve days off Increase in the daily value of reserve guarantee Pilot option to add an additional reserve day in high LPA months Short Call caps Elimination of FDOs for Basic categories Elimination of involuntary FSB Improved voluntary reserve options Improved Long Call and Short Call callout times Increased pay for voluntary FSB Remove crew desk discretion from reserve assignment order Incentives to avoid involuntarily rolling of reserve days off Elimination of FDO's for global reserve virtually makes no difference. Global reserve is United invention, it should be abolished all together. No one else has it. |
Originally Posted by Hedley
(Post 3620307)
There are improvements agreed to, and open. Until it’s finalized, we can’t really judge it. The reserve first crowd isn’t going to get everything that they want, and the reserve last crowd won’t either.
From the last negotiations notes: Agreed: No involuntary assignment before 10 a.m. on Day 1 of a reserve block Elimination of flexible day off (FDOs) for Global categories Option to split holy days off (HDOs) into two shorter periods in Global categories Voluntary Long Call Reserve lines where short call (SC) and field standby (FSB) is only through aggressive pick-up (APU) Reserves maintain original scheduled release time when deviating Increased restrictions on assigning Visiting Reserves All unused Short Call assignments receive 1 hour of additional minimum pay guarantee (MPG) Trip trades between reserves Reserve day-for-day trades Add Pay for reserve rolled days off Add Pay for late build Short Calls Improved release times if unused on last day of reserve Add Pay for voluntary assignments that start prior to 10 a.m. on Day 1 Open Items: Increase in number of reserve days off Increase in the daily value of reserve guarantee Pilot option to add an additional reserve day in high LPA months Short Call caps Elimination of FDOs for Basic categories Elimination of involuntary FSB Improved voluntary reserve options Improved Long Call and Short Call callout times Increased pay for voluntary FSB Remove crew desk discretion from reserve assignment order Incentives to avoid involuntarily rolling of reserve days off we may as well roll the dice and vote in a contract with these rules. Odds are that they still cannot fill the CA vacancies. Then the company needs to consider an LOA with improvements …. |
Unfortunately, while the list of agreed items is long it's a mere Pfft!!! towards fixing reserve. It's the things in the "open items" that are the important items, and mostly fall into the Delta standard, that will actually make reserve better and in line with industry standard.
Pretty bad when the rallying cry of a major airline is, "Give me industry standard !!" And that's why "reserve" is a hot topic on the forum. JMHO edit... TFAYD beat me to it |
Originally Posted by serce
(Post 3620139)
10 AM show on day one, Jetblue is 1400. That alone makes it non-commutable for a large percentage of the pilot group. 30 percent of the pilot group is on reserve. Reserve is not a choice, it's a matter of bad luck. I spent 14 years on reserve and it was not by choice.
|
Originally Posted by serce
(Post 3620319)
10AM assignment is exactly what we have now, still earlier than both American and Delta and yet it's listed as an improvement.
Elimination of FDO's for global reserve virtually makes no difference. Global reserve is United invention, it should be abolished all together. No one else has it. |
Originally Posted by Broncofan
(Post 3620338)
sounds like you shouldn’t bid reserve.. honestly I’m not too worried about reserve rules. They aren’t the best but I have had much worse in my career. I also avoid it. This is a company problem. If they don’t fix it, they will continue to have a hard time filling Captain slots. Worst case scenario people stop coming to Indoc classes because of it and they will have to do something about it. Until then, i’m just going to continue to avoid bidding for BES that would put me on reserve.
So, using that logic we don't need to worry about pay rates or scope or well.. ANYTHING. "They aren’t the best but I have had much worse in my career." ."This is a company problem. If they don’t fix it, they will continue to have a hard time filling Captain slots. Worst case scenario people stop coming to Indoc classes because of it and they will have to do something about it." So, in essence we can just sit back because the company will fix all our issues to remain competitive for new hires and to fill captain positions? This is why "reserve" keeps getting brought up on this forum |
Originally Posted by Broncofan
(Post 3620338)
sounds like you shouldn’t bid reserve.. honestly I’m not too worried about reserve rules. They aren’t the best but I have had much worse in my career. I also avoid it. This is a company problem. If they don’t fix it, they will continue to have a hard time filling Captain slots. Worst case scenario people stop coming to Indoc classes because of it and they will have to do something about it. Until then, i’m just going to continue to avoid bidding for BES that would put me on reserve.
|
Originally Posted by dailyops
(Post 3620216)
Now 10am is seen as improvement because we gave it away in TA1.
We didn’t give ANYTHING away in TA1. It was voted down by 94%,we had a crooked MEC who left a legacy of Kirby centric toddlers who tried to pass off a ridiculously substandard pro management TA as an industry leading contract. Most of them got fired from ALPA. The message is loud and clear, NOTHING was given away in the failed TA1 that’s why we voted it down and fired the losers who tried to push it off on us. |
Originally Posted by Broncofan
(Post 3620338)
sounds like you shouldn’t bid reserve.. honestly I’m not too worried about reserve rules. They aren’t the best but I have had much worse in my career. I also avoid it. This is a company problem. If they don’t fix it, they will continue to have a hard time filling Captain slots. Worst case scenario people stop coming to Indoc classes because of it and they will have to do something about it. Until then, i’m just going to continue to avoid bidding for BES that would put me on reserve.
So when I see a comment like yours regarding if you don’t want to be on reserve don’t bid it. I immediately assume you have been coddled in your career and haven’t yet experienced the realities of an airline industry induced B-slap. And your credibility with me drops to just below zero. We need to fix reserve so it’s livable and commutable. Because you never know when the aviation gods are going to smite thee with yet another stint of commuting to reserve. Without solid meaningful reserve improvements, I’m a hard no vote. |
Originally Posted by Broncofan
(Post 3620338)
sounds like you shouldn’t bid reserve.. honestly I’m not too worried about reserve rules. They aren’t the best but I have had much worse in my career. I also avoid it. This is a company problem. If they don’t fix it, they will continue to have a hard time filling Captain slots. Worst case scenario people stop coming to Indoc classes because of it and they will have to do something about it. Until then, i’m just going to continue to avoid bidding for BES that would put me on reserve.
|
Originally Posted by Airhoss
(Post 3620374)
In my 25.5 years with UAL I’ve spent a grand total of about 10 years on reserve. INCLUDING being shipped back to reserve during the lovely spring and summer of 2020 when I only had 23.5 years seniority with UAL. I also spent an additional sentence at TK to avoid reserve after getting mauled on the ISL while watching folks with 10 years less time on property enjoy holding a line on my desired seats.
So when I see a comment like yours regarding if you don’t want to be on reserve don’t bid it. I immediately assume you have been coddled in your career and haven’t yet experienced the realities of an airline industry induced B-slap. And your credibility with me drops to just below zero. We need to fix reserve so it’s livable and commutable. Because you never know when the aviation gods are going to smite thee with yet another stint of commuting to reserve. Without solid meaningful reserve improvements, I’m a hard no vote. |
Originally Posted by serce
(Post 3620319)
10AM assignment is exactly what we have now, still earlier than both American and Delta and yet it's listed as an improvement.
Elimination of FDO's for global reserve virtually makes no difference. Global reserve is United invention, it should be abolished all together. No one else has it. |
Originally Posted by serce
(Post 3620319)
10AM assignment is exactly what we have now, still earlier than both American and Delta and yet it's listed as an improvement.
Elimination of FDO's for global reserve virtually makes no difference. Global reserve is United invention, it should be abolished all together. No one else has it. |
Originally Posted by Broncofan
(Post 3620402)
I spent 8 years at regionals, all of which were commuting and for the most part, a 3 leg commute to reserve, but that was my choice to follow my wife’s career. Then spent 3 years at United commuting to global reserve. I understand that it sucks. However I don’t want to spend too much time and money negotiating for it. Some things in global reserve need to change, however the vast majority of guys on reserve right now choose to be there. Also if you live in base, there isn’t much to complain about besides the onslaught of FSB’s and short calls which seem to be getting taken care of. Sure sometimes reserve isn’t a choice, but despite what you say, everyone has the ability to move in base, just whether or not you choose to is up to you. My concern is guys are going to get an overall good contract in front of them but turn it down because first day call out is 10 am.. the horror.
|
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:19 AM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands