Airline Pilot Central Forums

Airline Pilot Central Forums (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/)
-   United (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/united/)
-   -   Write your Reps (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/united/144403-write-your-reps.html)

guppie 09-05-2023 10:26 AM

Write your Reps
 
Email your reps and let them know what you think. It will take you 2 minutes. Tell them to let the membership decide!!

89Pistons 09-05-2023 10:31 AM


Originally Posted by guppie (Post 3692764)
Email your reps and let them know what you think. It will take you 2 minutes. Tell them to let the membership decide!!

IOW, tell them to vote yes on it? That's what you really meant. Which is fine.

DarkSideMoon 09-05-2023 10:39 AM


Originally Posted by guppie (Post 3692764)
Email your reps and let them know what you think. It will take you 2 minutes. Tell them to let the membership decide!!

Is “letting membership decide” even an option with age discrimination laws?

Otterbox 09-05-2023 12:24 PM


Originally Posted by guppie (Post 3692764)
Email your reps and let them know what you think. It will take you 2 minutes. Tell them to let the membership decide!!

The MEC should vote it down and fix it before sending it to Membership. Too many concessions.

DarkSideMoon 09-05-2023 12:53 PM


Originally Posted by DarkSideMoon (Post 3692771)
Is “letting membership decide” even an option with age discrimination laws?

Oops. Thought you meant congressional reps and age 67. Disregard.

ugleeual 09-05-2023 01:08 PM


Originally Posted by Otterbox (Post 3692834)
The MEC should vote it down and fix it before sending it to Membership. Too many concessions.

you talking about the same MEC that voted a month ago to unanimously pass the AIP that became the TA? If they do then hopefully every flip/flop yes/no rep will be booted. This needs to go to Member Ratification… that ship sailed

89Pistons 09-05-2023 01:42 PM


Originally Posted by ugleeual (Post 3692861)
you talking about the same MEC that voted a month ago to unanimously pass the AIP that became the TA? If they do then hopefully every flip/flop yes/no rep will be booted. This needs to go to Member Ratification… that ship sailed


The push to rush through this part of the process by some makes me suspicious. It's a bad look. Bad vibe.

They voted on bullet points. Broad ideas. Without the benefit of final language. A vote for an AIP and a vote for a TA are not required to be the same. Otherwise, why vote again? I know many want to hurry up and get this over with but this part of the process is necessary. Governed by the policy manual. The language has to be vetted and the reps just got the final language on the same day we did.

I'm sure this will get past the MEC and will end up going to ratification. Everyone will have their chance to vote. But it's way too early to threaten a recall if a rep reads the final language and sees too many easter eggs. I know many want to get their hands on their retro check but relax and let this play out. We've had the language for less than a week. Chill.

khergan 09-05-2023 02:02 PM

No, I don't think I will.

Rjros1988 09-05-2023 02:15 PM

Did that two days ago.

yesto67 09-05-2023 02:23 PM


Originally Posted by ugleeual (Post 3692861)
you talking about the same MEC that voted a month ago to unanimously pass the AIP that became the TA? If they do then hopefully every flip/flop yes/no rep will be booted. This needs to go to Member Ratification… that ship sailed

Exactly. If the MEC rejects the TA, the membership will implode, heads will roll, and we won’t see another TA for a couple years.


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:19 AM.


Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands