|
[QUOTE=LJ Driver;3701537]
Originally Posted by BlueScholar
(Post 3701258)
Mmm yes, the “sun sentinel” as your reliable source. Here you go smarty pants: “Hospitals report every SARS-CoV-2 positive patient who dies in the hospital as a COVID-19-related death.” https://thehill.com/opinion/healthca...-death-counts/ “Last week, after reporting from the Guardian on mortality rates among children, the CDC corrected a “coding logic error” that had inadvertently added more than 72,000 Covid deaths of all ages to the data tracker, one of the most publicly accessible sources for Covid data.” https://www.theguardian.com/world/20...t-covid-deaths Best yet, from THE source, and this is their revised death certificate guidance after the total F up previously. They released this update with no announcement or press release, it happened to be discovered by an actual journalist… https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nvss/covid-...h-data-quality When healthcare facilities are incentivized by trillions of dollars to list COVID as cause of death, who would have thought that might inflate and exacerbate the count? |
[QUOTE=GPullR;3701543]
Originally Posted by LJ Driver
(Post 3701537)
Wait, did u just quote the guardian as a reliable source......
The Guardian actually ran the numbers and called out CDC, then the CDC quietly completely changed their guidance on how to input data on death certificates, and also revised their own data by 72,000. Stop being a sheep and afraid to question our government. We aren’t perfect, and bureaucrats certainly aren't either. |
Originally Posted by AntiCompanyMan
(Post 3701533)
Wikipedia cites its sources when making a claim. The citations are present in the article. Project Veritas is, objectively, misinformation, disinformation, and propaganda. Project Veritas has no credible sources for any of its claims. One is not like the other. They cannot be called "journalists" since they are little more than internet trolls weaponizing misinformation and exploiting people who are not media literate (looks like you fall in this category). They are not mavericks who are victims of an oppressive main stream media machine; they are stooges who succeed in duping people like you, even though their claims are easily disproven.
It's scary how people will believe anything on the internet so long as it confirms their preexisting beliefs. Probably a generational thing, but media isn’t what it used to be. They all lost a ton of credibility (fox included) when Covid happened. In this day in age, pretty easy to do basic research and spot inconsistencies. This inherently tears the fabric of your reality, but it’s not what it used to be and I’m sorry you’re feeling the way you are. I hope you have a good day |
It isn't generational there have always been fringe "news." Remember those rag magazines like Enquirer that were at the grocery store check out line. People bought them and you would listen to your crazy aunt talk about aliens at Thanksgiving dinner but no one takes them seriously. Same thing with these fringe news sites today... it is meant for entertainment and the weak minded. I will smile and listen to your crazy in cruise but no one is taking it seriously. You are tilting at windmills.
|
Originally Posted by SoFloFlyer
(Post 3701603)
Just because you say it’s objectively misinformation doesn’t make it such. Claims of them “spreading misinformation” has made its way to the court system in NY and they have won every single one of those cases.
https://www.reuters.com/legal/project-veritas-loses-jury-verdict-democratic-consulting-firm-2022-09-23/ https://lawandcrime.com/high-profile/project-veritas-loses-journalistic-and-attorney-client-privilege-claims-in-ashley-biden-case/amp/ |
Soo funny that they are starting to take down a lot on this website. Crazies dont want there name out there anymore. That backfired for them.
|
[QUOTE=LJ Driver;3701594]
Originally Posted by GPullR
(Post 3701543)
Deflection and subterfuge, I’d expect nothing less. Also, be sure to ignore the other sources, INCLUDING THE CDC ITSELF. The Guardian actually ran the numbers and called out CDC, then the CDC quietly completely changed their guidance on how to input data on death certificates, and also revised their own data by 72,000. Stop being a sheep and afraid to question our government. We aren’t perfect, and bureaucrats certainly aren't either. |
Originally Posted by SoFloFlyer
(Post 3701603)
Just because you say it’s objectively misinformation doesn’t make it such. Claims of them “spreading misinformation” has made its way to the court system in NY and they have won every single one of those cases.
Probably a generational thing, but media isn’t what it used to be. They all lost a ton of credibility (fox included) when Covid happened. In this day in age, pretty easy to do basic research and spot inconsistencies. This inherently tears the fabric of your reality, but it’s not what it used to be and I’m sorry you’re feeling the way you are. I hope you have a good day |
They might be shady, but I don’t think they’ve been successfully challenged legally on libel. |
Originally Posted by SoFloFlyer
(Post 3701603)
This inherently tears the fabric of your reality, but it’s not what it used to be and I’m sorry you’re feeling the way you are. I hope you have a good day i’ll buy ya a beer if we ever fly together. hope you have a nice night pal |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:05 PM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands