![]() |
Florida exp to pounce on Spirit's routes
This schedule expansion means that we will now offer:
|
Originally Posted by GoCats67
(Post 3945399)
“If Spirit suddenly goes out of business it will be incredibly disruptive, so we’re adding these flights to give their customers other options if they want or need them,” said Global Network Planning and Alliances SVP Patrick Quayle.
|
Originally Posted by greatmovieistar
(Post 3945401)
ohh how sweet. Very generous of them. lol, Kirby the vulture is wasting no time swooping in eating up the pieces left by Spirit.
|
Originally Posted by greatmovieistar
(Post 3945401)
ohh how sweet. Very generous of them. lol, Kirby the vulture is wasting no time swooping in eating up the pieces left by Spirit.
|
He may be an a-hole, but he's our a-hole.
|
Wishing the best for Spirit pilots.
|
All these new airplanes have to go somewhere. With the economy slowing down, I think these new flights will drive down legacy yields more than ULCC yields.
Spirit is used to operating with very low yields. Is United? I hope so. |
Originally Posted by greatmovieistar
(Post 3945401)
ohh how sweet. Very generous of them. lol, Kirby the vulture is wasting no time swooping in eating up the pieces left by Spirit.
|
Originally Posted by greatmovieistar
(Post 3945401)
lol, Kirby the vulture.
In case you don’t know MCO/ FLL to EWR is LIKE A BIG FRGN market and EWR is once again slot controlled. If he doesn’t act on that….surely AA maybe even Delta and JB would. If An opportunity such as this is missed and gobbled up by your competitors, one might call that negligence. |
Originally Posted by BlueScholar
(Post 3945433)
Welcome to capitalism!
|
Originally Posted by greatmovieistar
(Post 3945401)
ohh how sweet. Very generous of them. lol, Kirby the vulture is wasting no time swooping in eating up the pieces left by Spirit.
but, what do you expect the business leaders or competitors to do? Sit back just hope it works out for the other company? Every competing company is trying to outdo the other. Destroy them, even. This is no different. I’ll support every displaced pilot as best I can, it I would expect nothing different from any other company. |
Originally Posted by greatmovieistar;[url=tel:3945401
3945401[/url]]ohh how sweet. Very generous of them. lol, Kirby the vulture is wasting no time swooping in eating up the pieces left by Spirit.
Did you think they would just sit empty as the industry sits around and weeps the death of some close friend? Get real. |
Originally Posted by JackReacher
(Post 3945487)
Exactly. Either UAL tries to fill the void or someone else will. But either way, the void WILL be filled by someone.
That’s what she said 🤣 |
Originally Posted by greatmovieistar
(Post 3945401)
ohh how sweet. Very generous of them. lol, Kirby the vulture is wasting no time swooping in eating up the pieces left by Spirit.
|
Originally Posted by ClappedOut145
(Post 3945530)
As he should. I’d like to see one flight an hour out of every gate in MCO, FLL, TPA, etc from 0600-2000 in order to maximize every available ounce of flying possible. This is a business. Kirby and Quayle are a weakness and an opening in these markets and it’s their job to capitalize on that weakness.
|
Originally Posted by greatmovieistar
(Post 3945401)
ohh how sweet. Very generous of them. lol, Kirby the vulture is wasting no time swooping in eating up the pieces left by Spirit.
not a Kirby disciple but get a grip man. People are trying to run a business here. |
Originally Posted by Agratefulflyer
(Post 3945654)
not a Kirby disciple but get a grip man. People are trying to run a business here.
|
Originally Posted by iahflyr
(Post 3945427)
All these new airplanes have to go somewhere. With the economy slowing down, I think these new flights will drive down legacy yields more than ULCC yields.
Spirit is used to operating with very low yields. Is United? I hope so. https://www.economist.com/business/2...airlines-aloft “You might expect America’s most valuable airline to earn its keep flying passengers. But you would be mistaken. Last year Delta Air Lines notched up an operating profit of $6bn, comfortably ahead of its domestic rivals. Buried in the financial statements, however, was a more revealing point. Without the revenue from its loyalty programme, it would have operated at a loss.” |
Originally Posted by SoFloFlyer;[url=tel:3945659
3945659[/url]]It’s weird that only Kirby got flack, but not F9. They did the same thing a few days ago on about 20 NK routes
|
United lags at least 3 other airlines in Florida capacity so it makes sense to be interested should an opportunity present. I like that our pilot group isn’t high fiving each other on forums and elsewhere (like SWA pilots would do in the early 2000s as the big 5 legacies floundered post 9–11)but are mostly showing concern for the effected pilots at Spirit.
|
Originally Posted by jumppilot
(Post 3945662)
The big airlines don’t make money flying people.
https://www.economist.com/business/2...airlines-aloft “You might expect America’s most valuable airline to earn its keep flying passengers. But you would be mistaken. Last year Delta Air Lines notched up an operating profit of $6bn, comfortably ahead of its domestic rivals. Buried in the financial statements, however, was a more revealing point. Without the revenue from its loyalty programme, it would have operated at a loss.” Delta didn't have over $6B in "credit card revenue". Even if it did, there were costs associated with it. If you remove the people that traded in credit card miles to fly, you also have to remove the costs associated with them. At Delta's profit margin that would be billions of costs. Which would still make them wildly profitable. If Delta and United can't make money with the scale they both have how did Spirit, Jetblue etc ever make money? So small airlines can be profitable because they have "great management" but large ones with scale only make money because of credit cards? Ask any pilot from a small airline and they will tell you how they are itching to merge with some other airline because they need "scale to compete with the Big 3". But if big airlines aren't really profitable then why do they want to be part of a bigger airline? United made $5B last year, but only took in $1.9B in "all other revenue" including credit card miles, club memberships, etc. Even without that United would have been profitable. Total actual profit to United last year from credit card miles was likely less than $1B of its $5B. Still more profit than all other US airlines combined, not counting Delta. These bad take articles only make people feel good about hating on successful airlines. There is little factual information in them. |
Originally Posted by FriendlyPilot
(Post 3945720)
Not true. Anyone that can actually read a balance sheet and income statement can understand this is fake.
Delta didn't have over $6B in "credit card revenue". Even if it did, there were costs associated with it. If you remove the people that traded in credit card miles to fly, you also have to remove the costs associated with them. At Delta's profit margin that would be billions of costs. Which would still make them wildly profitable. If Delta and United can't make money with the scale they both have how did Spirit, Jetblue etc ever make money? So small airlines can be profitable because they have "great management" but large ones with scale only make money because of credit cards? Ask any pilot from a small airline and they will tell you how they are itching to merge with some other airline because they need "scale to compete with the Big 3". But if big airlines aren't really profitable then why do they want to be part of a bigger airline? United made $5B last year, but only took in $1.9B in "all other revenue" including credit card miles, club memberships, etc. Even without that United would have been profitable. Total actual profit to United last year from credit card miles was likely less than $1B of its $5B. Still more profit than all other US airlines combined, not counting Delta. These bad take articles only make people feel good about hating on successful airlines. There is little factual information in them. |
Originally Posted by Vernon Demerest
(Post 3945719)
United lags at least 3 other airlines in Florida capacity so it makes sense to be interested should an opportunity present. I like that our pilot group isn’t high fiving each other on forums and elsewhere (like SWA pilots would do in the early 2000s as the big 5 legacies floundered post 9–11)but are mostly showing concern for the effected pilots at Spirit.
|
Originally Posted by drywhitetoast
(Post 3945423)
He may be an a-hole, but he's our a-hole.
|
For something to even start to be considered for a pilot base, much less a hub, it needs to at the bare minimum start with service to all the existing hubs. FLL and MIA do not even have service to LAX. Those airports are a far ways away from being a pilot base, much less a hub
|
Originally Posted by iahflyr
(Post 3948126)
For something to even start to be considered for a pilot base, much less a hub, it needs to at the bare minimum start with service to all the existing hubs. FLL and MIA do not even have service to LAX. Those airports are a far ways away from being a pilot base, much less a hub
|
Originally Posted by iahflyr
(Post 3948126)
For something to even start to be considered for a pilot base, much less a hub, it needs to at the bare minimum start with service to all the existing hubs. FLL and MIA do not even have service to LAX. Those airports are a far ways away from being a pilot base, much less a hub
|
Originally Posted by Andy
(Post 3948148)
That would quickly change if a lot of gates suddenly became available. The big constraint right now is gates. United currently has only 4 FLL gates.
|
Originally Posted by FriendlyPilot
(Post 3948194)
GUM is a pilot base. How many direct GUM flights do we have to hubs?
|
Originally Posted by FriendlyPilot
(Post 3948197)
FLL is a low margin leisure destination and most airlines lose money flying into there.
There are a lot of wealthy people who live in the area and a lot of wealthy people who visit there. |
Originally Posted by Andy
(Post 3948253)
... due to the largest carrier out of there being a ULCC. I suppose the same could be said about MCO and LAS, yet we have bases there.
There are a lot of wealthy people who live in the area and a lot of wealthy people who visit there. I never said "we don't have pilot bases in low margin cities". I said that FLL is a low margin airport, which it is. I wonder how many of those "wealthy people" are flying on Spirit? |
Originally Posted by FriendlyPilot
(Post 3948352)
The largest carrier in LAS is Southwest. They are not a ULCC. Just because a ULCC flies there doesn't make it a low margin airport.
I never said "we don't have pilot bases in low margin cities". I said that FLL is a low margin airport, which it is. I wonder how many of those "wealthy people" are flying on Spirit? As a native S Floridian I will say the demographic shift here is not great in a lot of ways. It is great for our economy though, and hopefully good for my career. |
Originally Posted by FriendlyPilot
(Post 3948352)
The largest carrier in LAS is Southwest. They are not a ULCC. Just because a ULCC flies there doesn't make it a low margin airport.
I never said "we don't have pilot bases in low margin cities". I said that FLL is a low margin airport, which it is. I wonder how many of those "wealthy people" are flying on Spirit? And a lot of those wealthy people are likely flying Spirit. FLL's current low margin fares are due to Spirit's (and JetBlue) large presence there. Are you implying that United won't want to pick up additional gates in FLL should gates become available? |
Originally Posted by Andy
(Post 3948370)
I used to live in LAS. It's a low margin airport. With a lot of ULCC flights daily.
And a lot of those wealthy people are likely flying Spirit. FLL's current low margin fares are due to Spirit's (and JetBlue) large presence there. Are you implying that United won't want to pick up additional gates in FLL should gates become available? |
Originally Posted by JackpotAir
(Post 3948369)
Don’t believe FLL is as low margin as you say. The demographics have changed here in South Florida a lot over the past 5 years. We have more wealth than ever before. More snowbirds that find they’re staying all year too.
As a native S Floridian I will say the demographic shift here is not great in a lot of ways. It is great for our economy though, and hopefully good for my career. |
Originally Posted by Swakid8
(Post 3948375)
Yields out of FLL are still very low…
|
Originally Posted by Otterbox
(Post 3948371)
The gates that would be available if given up by spirit are apparently not located near United existing gates (different terminal?). There would be challenges.
You've never seen an airport reshuffle gates? LAX did it less than a decade ago when United gave up all of their terminal 6 gates. American ended up the winner (LAX shuffle was Kirby's baby when he was at American) in interconnecting terminals 4,5,6; United maintained terminal 7 and 8. Delta moved to terminal 3 but their Sky Club remained in terminal 5 (IIRC) for quite a while before it finally got moved over to terminal 3. I'd expect the same here. It doesn't even have to be much of a shuffle. There will be FLL gates becoming available due to AeroCap terminating 37 Neo leases (and another 30 some Neos on order)... Spirit is not going to be able to keep the current number of gates there. United's network planners aren't going to sit there with their thumbs up their butts doing nothing when gate space becomes available ... at any airport. |
Originally Posted by Andy
(Post 3948381)
Yes, that's correct. United's in terminal 1 and Spirit's in terminal 3 and 4.
You've never seen an airport reshuffle gates? LAX did it less than a decade ago when United gave up all of their terminal 6 gates. American ended up the winner (LAX shuffle was Kirby's baby when he was at American) in interconnecting terminals 4,5,6; United maintained terminal 7 and 8. Delta moved to terminal 3 but their Sky Club remained in terminal 5 (IIRC) for quite a while before it finally got moved over to terminal 3. I'd expect the same here. It doesn't even have to be much of a shuffle. There will be FLL gates becoming available due to AeroCap terminating 37 Neo leases (and another 30 some Neos on order)... Spirit is not going to be able to keep the current number of gates there. United's network planners aren't going to sit there with their thumbs up their butts doing nothing when gate space becomes available ... at any airport. Didn't take long for us to paint blue over the green and start operating out of them. |
Originally Posted by khergan
(Post 3948395)
To add to this, think about how in the last year when Frontier gave up all their A terminal gates in DEN so they could use the outdoor gates with jet stairs at the other end.
Didn't take long for us to paint blue over the green and start operating out of them. I still mourn the loss of SEA (I had no desire to be based there, but it would have helped with expansion in the west). Fortunately, that was the only hub smallsack closed before they fired him. |
Originally Posted by JackpotAir
(Post 3948369)
Don’t believe FLL is as low margin as you say. The demographics have changed here in South Florida a lot over the past 5 years. We have more wealth than ever before. More snowbirds that find they’re staying all year too.
As a native S Floridian I will say the demographic shift here is not great in a lot of ways. It is great for our economy though, and hopefully good for my career. The premium market is full fare refundable business tickets with connections. Snowbirds are low margin travelers. |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:35 AM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands