MEC TPA Vote
02-28-2012, 05:42 AM
#11
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Sep 2008
Position: 737 FO
Posts: 163
Originally Posted by Regularguy
Here's what bothers me most about the details:
UCHM was/are going to open 756 bases in IAH and DEN where there are already 756 pilots of the other group! The only win here are for those local CAL who are commuting (DEN). The rest is just pure disregard for the people of the airline.
Let's get a JCBA and fix this.
UCHM was/are going to open 756 bases in IAH and DEN where there are already 756 pilots of the other group! The only win here are for those local CAL who are commuting (DEN). The rest is just pure disregard for the people of the airline.
Let's get a JCBA and fix this.
02-28-2012, 06:02 AM
#12
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Feb 2011
Posts: 215
Originally Posted by davessn763
We just gave the company the "synergies" they want for nothing in return.
02-28-2012, 06:18 AM
#13
HOSED BY PBS AGAIN
Joined APC: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,713
I would SERIOUSLY like to know who the hell is negotiating ALL our lives away? It's high time ALL the unions legal departments were given their walking papers. Looks like they work for management anyway. What a joke.
02-28-2012, 06:35 AM
#17
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Position: 737 CAPT
Posts: 1,882
5. TPA Section 4-D is modified to provide that S-CO may operate an LAX B-737 Base without restriction, provided that the number of Pilots assigned to the S-UA LAX Domicile may only decrease as a result of attrition at the Domicile.
Originally Posted by Blockoutblockin
I'm thinking item No. 5 is going to be a biggy.
Time will tell. From what I understand, the CLE base has still been doing the Hilo stuff and IAH and CLE guys have been doing that GDL and BJX Mexico stuff. Results in unproductive trips because LAX pilots are restricted from doing this. If all it does is consolidate those flights to LAX I'm not sure it will be that bad. HOWEVER, something tells me that opens up a whole lot of other routes the company would like to do with those pilots (I believe KOA has a scheduled 737 somewhere in the coming months?).
02-28-2012, 06:45 AM
#18
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Feb 2009
Position: 73 CA EWR
Posts: 514
Originally Posted by EWRflyr
Time will tell. From what I understand, the CLE base has still been doing the Hilo stuff and IAH and CLE guys have been doing that GDL and BJX Mexico stuff. Results in unproductive trips because LAX pilots are restricted from doing this. If all it does is consolidate those flights to LAX I'm not sure it will be that bad. HOWEVER, something tells me that opens up a whole lot of other routes the company would like to do with those pilots (I believe KOA has a scheduled 737 somewhere in the coming months?).
02-28-2012, 07:23 AM
#19
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Sep 2008
Position: 737 FO
Posts: 163
Originally Posted by Blockoutblockin
Actually, as a Newark based Ca I was the poster child for the SFO - GDL runs and find my way out to the islands at least once a quarter. I think they are just way too short on staffing and I can't imagine how they are going to staff this bid without raping the reserves more than they all ready are.
02-28-2012, 07:36 AM
#20
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Mar 2009
Posts: 114
Originally Posted by EWRflyr
Time will tell. From what I understand, the CLE base has still been doing the Hilo stuff and IAH and CLE guys have been doing that GDL and BJX Mexico stuff. Results in unproductive trips because LAX pilots are restricted from doing this. If all it does is consolidate those flights to LAX I'm not sure it will be that bad. HOWEVER, something tells me that opens up a whole lot of other routes the company would like to do with those pilots (I believe KOA has a scheduled 737 somewhere in the coming months?).
It's past time to motivate management to get the JCBA done.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
