Search

Notices

Red Jackets/Shirts ?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-06-2012 | 07:30 PM
  #1  
Thread Starter
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 1,559
Likes: 0
From: A Nobody
Default Red Jackets/Shirts ?

Can any of you LCAL folks explain to us LUAL types what they are and their "authority" is. I have been hearing rumors about "red Jackets" telling captains to fly jets they intend to "unable to operate" safely on the flight. Also threats of firing Captains and reassigning others to flights outside of contractual agreements. What's up here?
Reply
Old 03-06-2012 | 07:43 PM
  #2  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 225
Likes: 0
From: EWR B737FO
Default

Originally Posted by Regularguy
Can any of you LCAL folks explain to us LUAL types what they are and their "authority" is. I have been hearing rumors about "red Jackets" telling captains to fly jets they intend to "unable to operate" safely on the flight. Also threats of firing Captains and reassigning others to flights outside of contractual agreements. What's up here?
If you're talking about red coats...never seen or heard of examples you mentioned above. That is well outside their responsibilities and if they were so foolish, the Captains I know and have flown with on the 737 would professionally tell them to go xxxx themselves. You got an example?
Reply
Old 03-06-2012 | 07:54 PM
  #3  
oldmako's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 3,074
Likes: 1
From: The GF of FUPM
Default

Yes. There is an interesting thread on the other forum about a LUAL Cap refusing to fly an airplane with a mechanical issue.

A LCAL Customer Service rep found out that the issue was MEL-able and blew a gasket and had words with the Captain. Then CS tried to recruit deadheading F/O on flight to fly the plane. Needless to say, that wasn't going to happen. Then, CS told DH F/O that refusing to fly a plane at CAL would get you fired. Then got on PA and told pax to be sure and thank the pilots for canceling their flight!!

Now, if this is all true, and this is the way business is conducted at CAL WRT to Captains authority, aircraft refusals and Customer Service Agents, then this is one hell of a pathetic story and it seems to me that there is a serious breach of Captains Authority at LCAL. Please tell me that this was an aberration and that I have it all wrong.

***This doesn't imply that LUAL doesn't have some Marvins who would willingly do a transcon single engine or something equally idiotic even though perfectly legal. But, they are few and far between and we generally don't tolerate this type of treatment from CS. And when a plane is refused, the Captain speaks to, and answers Flight Ops personnel, not CS. Additionally, he doesn't get fired if his reasoning is valid. There would also be serious repercussions for the CS agent.

As it stands now, I am very proud of our "culture" where even a lowly First Officer can refuse to fly an airplane.
Reply
Old 03-07-2012 | 02:50 AM
  #4  
13n144e's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 426
Likes: 0
From: 787 CA
Default

Originally Posted by oldmako
tell me that this was an aberration and that I have it all wrong.
If true (not saying it's not) it is indeed an aberration. Never had anything remotely like this happen to me and the only issues I've had with CSA's have been non-rev related. That's not to say Captains Authority couldn't use some bolstering at L-CAL but more frequently the blame lies with the individual captain just being a big wuss.
Reply
Old 03-07-2012 | 03:14 AM
  #5  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 621
Likes: 0
Default

The Red Coat at L-CAL is one of three people that oversee and have authority over the release of the aircraft. The Red Coat works in conjunction with the Captain and Dispatcher to ensure operational integrity. If ever there is a conflict between the three parties, the Red Coast has final authority.

That was all bs (just like fanning the paranoia flames). The Red Coast is a gate agent who is better trained to deal with things like disruptive passengers that need to removed from airplanes. The RC has absolutely no control over the aircraft or flight crew.
Reply
Old 03-07-2012 | 04:04 AM
  #6  
SoCalGuy's Avatar
Keep Calm Chive ON
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 2,086
Likes: 0
From: Boeing's Plastic Jet Button Pusher - 787
Default

Originally Posted by oldmako
A LCAL Customer Service rep found out that the issue was MEL-able and blew a gasket and had words with the Captain. Then CS tried to recruit deadheading F/O on flight to fly the plane. Needless to say, that wasn't going to happen. Then, CS told DH F/O that refusing to fly a plane at CAL would get you fired. Then got on PA and told pax to be sure and thank the pilots for canceling their flight!
Very interesting story indeed. I would "guess" (whole heartedly bet) that this is a classic example of a tail getting taller the game of "telephone" is played out.

Bottom line, I don't recall reading anywhere in the FOM about the "red coat" having a mutual hand in the signing for/or dispatching of a flight. When their signature for the a/c is required, then they can open that pie hole, until such time.....they know where they can go.
Reply
Old 03-07-2012 | 04:14 AM
  #7  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 225
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by SoCalGuy
Very interesting story indeed. I would "guess" (whole heartedly bet) that this is a classic example of a tail getting taller the game of "telephone" is played out.

Bottom line, I don't recall reading anywhere in the FOM about the "red coat" having a mutual hand in the signing for/or dispatching of a flight. When their signature for the a/c is required, then they can open that pie hole, until such time.....they know where they can go.
You actually have the term\title "red coat" used in your FOM?
Reply
Old 03-07-2012 | 04:52 AM
  #8  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 514
Likes: 0
From: 73 CA EWR
Default

Originally Posted by Once United
You actually have the term\title "red coat" used in your FOM?
Good question. The term red coat has been has been changed to gate agent. These agents are essentially gate agent supervisors. There are also conflict resolution officers (CRO) and ground security coordinators (GSC). The CROs deal with medical/disability issues and GSCs typically deal with passenger issues other than medical/disability. GSCs are typically managers who have been trained in dealing with the type of problems that may arise.

A "red coat" might also be a CRO but I have always had a manager acting as a GSC.

For the most part the gate agents/CROs/GSCs do an excellent job and I always try to make them feel as if they are part of the team (which they are). Of course everyone is suffering from a little merger related stress and the agents are no different. They have suffered the synergy syndrome and are sometimes pulling their hair out trying to get a plane out on time.
Reply
Old 03-07-2012 | 05:37 AM
  #9  
A320's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 650
Likes: 5
From: 787 Capt.
Default

Since when has the Continental Army ever been afraid of a few Red Coats
Reply
Old 03-07-2012 | 05:37 AM
  #10  
A320's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 650
Likes: 5
From: 787 Capt.
Default

This sounds like an urban legend to me.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Bayou
Military
149
08-17-2011 06:58 PM
AZFlyer
Technical
12
07-31-2011 12:01 PM
CaptainCarl
Hangar Talk
5
07-12-2010 09:57 PM
Puppyz
Hangar Talk
0
12-18-2006 12:39 PM
SWAjet
Major
0
04-21-2005 03:44 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices