787 settlement; more 737 options
07-20-2012 | 07:20 PM
#11
Banned
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 1,629
Likes: 0
From: 756 Left Side
BTW, if you're a NO Voter due to pay banding... I can respect that. But let me ask this.
What do you do if your (sUAL) NC condones PayBanding? ALPA National seems to condone it too.
In our C08 Proposal, we had 4 Bands (categories) for 14 different aircraft types [even though we have/had only 7 different aircraft types at the time].
Currently Delta has 11 bands for 22 different aircraft types. Of which, at least 5 aircraft types are not even flown by Delta.
PayBanding, is here to stay.. in some form. What needs to happen is that the bands have to be set up based on aircraft mission/size and also what they are replacing.
Motch
What do you do if your (sUAL) NC condones PayBanding? ALPA National seems to condone it too.
In our C08 Proposal, we had 4 Bands (categories) for 14 different aircraft types [even though we have/had only 7 different aircraft types at the time].
Currently Delta has 11 bands for 22 different aircraft types. Of which, at least 5 aircraft types are not even flown by Delta.
PayBanding, is here to stay.. in some form. What needs to happen is that the bands have to be set up based on aircraft mission/size and also what they are replacing.
Motch
07-20-2012 | 07:43 PM
#12
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 3,071
Likes: 0
BTW, if you're a NO Voter due to pay banding... I can respect that. But let me ask this.
What do you do if your (sUAL) NC condones PayBanding? ALPA National seems to condone it too.
In our C08 Proposal, we had 4 Bands (categories) for 14 different aircraft types [even though we have/had only 7 different aircraft types at the time].
Currently Delta has 11 bands for 22 different aircraft types. Of which, at least 5 aircraft types are not even flown by Delta.
PayBanding, is here to stay.. in some form. What needs to happen is that the bands have to be set up based on aircraft mission/size and also what they are replacing.
Motch
What do you do if your (sUAL) NC condones PayBanding? ALPA National seems to condone it too.
In our C08 Proposal, we had 4 Bands (categories) for 14 different aircraft types [even though we have/had only 7 different aircraft types at the time].
Currently Delta has 11 bands for 22 different aircraft types. Of which, at least 5 aircraft types are not even flown by Delta.
PayBanding, is here to stay.. in some form. What needs to happen is that the bands have to be set up based on aircraft mission/size and also what they are replacing.
Motch
You might want to think twice about the mission/size concept. It might not be the favorable comparison you envision.
07-21-2012 | 04:32 AM
#13
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 520
Likes: 0
Pay banding is only concessionary if the larger planes pays the smaller plane rate. Im all for pay banding if the small plane pays a higher rate, who wouldnt be?
Unfortunately, the emb 170 isnt a mainline aircraft if its currently flown at the regionals.
Have u seen the eagle proposal. 8 yr agreement. Prepping for > 70 seat turboprops? Flipping ridiculous
Unfortunately, the emb 170 isnt a mainline aircraft if its currently flown at the regionals.
Have u seen the eagle proposal. 8 yr agreement. Prepping for > 70 seat turboprops? Flipping ridiculous
07-21-2012 | 06:25 AM
#14
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 1,559
Likes: 0
From: A Nobody
"What needs to happen is that the bands have to be set up based on aircraft mission/size and also what they are replacing."
Ironically we have "pay banding" in the form of "gross weight airspeed" formula that goes back to the introduction of the jet airplane in the 60s.
My take has always been in the "jet age" pay should be based in seniority.
Ironically we have "pay banding" in the form of "gross weight airspeed" formula that goes back to the introduction of the jet airplane in the 60s.
My take has always been in the "jet age" pay should be based in seniority.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
