|
Originally Posted by Wrsofked
(Post 1253848)
That is not looking promising at all. So far the leaks have it as a substandard deal.
|
This shows the vacancies if you can decipher it.
Originally Posted by JetPilotMike
(Post 1253792)
How many of these FO spots are new/growth?
CLE 737 FO - 116 114 116 - DEN 737 CA - 34 78 78 44 Vacancies DEN 737 FO - 39 77 77 38 Vacancies NYC 737 CA 7 282 314 314 32 Vacancies NYC 737 FO 1 277 315 315 38 Vacancies IAH 737 CA 14 575 614 614 39 Vacancies IAH 737 FO 1 591 612 612 21 Vacancies GUM 737 CA 2 68 65 68 - GUM 737 FO - 60 74 74 14 Vacancies LAX 737 CA 3 72 82 82 10 Vacancies LAX 737 FO - 72 83 83 11 Vacancies ORD 737 CA - 34 73 73 39 Vacancies ORD 737 FO - 36 72 72 36 Vacancies 737 CA Total 27 1,182 1,341 1,346 164 Vacancies 737 FO Total 2 1,191 1,347 1,349 158 Vacancies NYC 756 CA 13 304 313 313 9 Vacancies NYC 756 FO - 419 455 455 36 Vacancies IAH 756 CA 4 160 165 165 5 Vacancies IAH 756 FO - 221 200 221 - 756 CA Total 17 464 478 478 14 Vacancies 756 FO Total - 640 655 676 36 Vacancies NYC 777 CA 10 124 132 132 8 Vacancies NYC 777 FO 3 324 345 345 21 Vacancies IAH 777 CA 4 42 42 42 - IAH 777 FO - 91 91 91 - 777 CA Total 14 166 174 174 8 Vacancies 777 FO Total 3 415 436 436 21 Vacancies IAH 787 CA 8 38 54 54 16 Vacancies IAH 787 FO - 98 132 132 34 Vacancies 787 CA Total 8 38 54 54 16 Vacancies 787 FO Total - 98 132 132 34 Vacancies System CA Total 66 1,850 2,047 2,052 202 Vacancies System FO Total 5 2,344 2,570 2,593 249 Vacancies System All Total 71 4,194 4,617 4,645 451 Vacancies |
71 retirements and 451 vacancies. So 380 new positions.
|
Originally Posted by Texandrvr
(Post 1253884)
71 retirements and 451 vacancies. So 380 new positions.
We need a RELEASE soon........ |
Originally Posted by Airhoss
(Post 1253842)
Interesting, can you not see what's happening here??
Do you think there will be strife? Negative and possibly inappropriate labels? The "230" or something? Just curious about people's thoughts on this. |
Originally Posted by workingforfree
(Post 1253894)
It does make me wonder how the new hires off the street would be treated. (I am not trying to instigate--just wondering)
Do you think there will be strife? Negative and possibly inappropriate labels? The "230" or something? Just curious about people's thoughts on this. |
Originally Posted by Wrsofked
(Post 1253933)
They would be treated just fine, just like anyone else. Labels and name calling is mostly done by chest pounders on these forums and in private conversations. This is a major corporation, they don't tolerate harrassment of any kind. I wouldnt worry about that at all. Get your app in, and good luck to you.
|
Originally Posted by Airhoss
(Post 1253839)
Either UCH quits ignoring the LUAL side or this thing will implode in a major way.
I do agree it's worth fighting over and i'm hoping this group will grow a collective pair. If 93 of the 202 Captain bids in our legacy domiciles doesn't wake the beast, i'm not sure anything will. Disgusted |
Originally Posted by SpecialTracking
(Post 1253939)
I dunno Hoss. We must be flying with different groups of L-UAL pilots. Many that I work with will jump right in line once the whip cracks.
Disgusted |
Originally Posted by Flyby1206
(Post 1253843)
Hiring off the street? Or hiring UAL furloughees?
Im just on the outside looking in, hope for a JCBA for both groups ASAP. Good luck They are trying to pull a CAL/ EAL here, growing one and shrinking the other into extinction. |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:52 PM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands