![]() |
Originally Posted by APC225
(Post 1273666)
We've got to accept DAL's scope because it's "industry standard" but longevity is an "exception to the rule." Funny how that works.
|
So is this support universal? Should the 147 CAL furloghees from '08 get 'retro' longevity?
|
Originally Posted by intrepidcv11
(Post 1273691)
So is this support universal? Should the 147 CAL furloghees from '08 get 'retro' longevity?
|
Originally Posted by JetPilotMike
(Post 1273693)
Yup. The poll clearly states UAL/CAL. What I find funny is they aren't asking for it. Haven't seen one post from them asking for it. Must be that "culture" I keep hearing about.
|
Longevity is in the contract. Company needs the junior vote and what better way to get it than longevity-that and to get u to look the other way about the 76 seat scope.
|
Originally Posted by intrepidcv11
(Post 1273695)
Well our guys who got furloughed '01 for the most part didn't get it either. Guys who took the flowback to XJT and flew CAL passengers got zilch. Did UAL furloghees that returned in '06 get longevity? Not picking a fight, honestly I don't know.
Horhay |
Originally Posted by intrepidcv11
(Post 1273691)
So is this support universal? Should the 147 CAL furloghees from '08 get 'retro' longevity?
|
"Was it over when the Germans bombed Pearl Harbor??!!!!":D
|
Originally Posted by oldmako
(Post 1273807)
"Was it over when the Germans bombed Pearl Harbor??!!!!":D
|
"Was it over when the Germans bombed Pearl Harbor??!!!!":D |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:49 AM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands