Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > United
Longevity for Furloughs >

Longevity for Furloughs

Search

Notices
View Poll Results: Longevity for Furloughed UAL/CAL in JCBA?
Yes - It's Industry Standard (DAL/AA)
46
56.10%
No - Sold out by the Senior Pilots
25
30.49%
Too Close to Call
11
13.41%
Voters: 82. You may not vote on this poll

Longevity for Furloughs

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-08-2012 | 05:22 AM
  #1  
Thread Starter
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 229
Likes: 0
From: CRJ, CR7, A320, B737
Default Longevity for Furloughs

With the possibility of a TA hopefully coming soon, what are your bets on Longevity for Furloughs for pay purposes?
Reply
Old 10-08-2012 | 05:46 AM
  #2  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 3,071
Likes: 0
Default

With all that our furloughees have been through, if they do not get longevity, I am truly ashamed.
Reply
Old 10-08-2012 | 06:03 AM
  #3  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 168
Likes: 0
Default Longevity for Furloughs

With our lack of representation, many resign from the Union.
Reply
Old 10-08-2012 | 06:12 AM
  #4  
McBoeingBus's Avatar
Line Holder
Veteran: Army
Veteran: Air Force
15 Years
40 Countries Visited
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 235
Likes: 0
From: Relaxing
Default

Unless their new contract changes things, the furloughed UPS pilots did not retain their longevity. After they were recalled they got a letter with their adjustment date for longevity.
Reply
Old 10-08-2012 | 06:35 AM
  #5  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 89
Likes: 0
Default

Delta got it. No reason we shouldn't. I know mgmt won't see it that way.
Reply
Old 10-08-2012 | 07:14 AM
  #6  
On Reserve
 
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 20
Likes: 0
Default

I think longevity is very important for us for this very reason: If we get screwed in the Seniority integration and find ourselves in court, a judge may be puzzled as to why we're being paid as 12th year employees but junior to a Continental Captain on 8th or 9th year pay. Can only help our case. Am I wrong? If longevity is not included for furloughees, I sure hope the TA is not put forth for a vote!
Reply
Old 10-08-2012 | 07:20 AM
  #7  
On Reserve
 
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 16
Likes: 0
Default

Here is what I heard from a friend in class who asked the CAL MEC rep the very same question about longevity. Take it for what you will:

"Upgrading 1437 pilots conceivably to much higher pay scales eats into the pie of what the contract costs the company. The company and union pull and shove about how many dollars they want to allocate to various areas of the contract. The union writes contracts to favor the majority in order to effect passage."

Ok so according to this the gist of the this CAL Rep's explanation about their view of how longevity fits in to the TA I get from this that longevity does not a favor a large voting block therefore it doesn't have the "bite grip" on the pie unlike issues more senior pilots are interested in.

Many of the 1437 will not even be on property to vote, roughly only 380-400. You juxtapose that against the interests of the senior folks who VASTLY outnumber the furloughees I see it as a tough sell.

Yes it's the right thing to, it's the honorable thing to do and so on and so forth....but folks reality check time (and I hope I am so VERY, VERY, VERY, VERY WRONG!). The furloughees are out of sight and out of mind of the senior folk. The most you'll get is about what you usually get from pilots in general who are still on property:

Hollow platitudes.
Reply
Old 10-08-2012 | 07:31 AM
  #8  
cadetdrivr's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 2,639
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Keyscrab
Here is what I heard from a friend in class who asked the CAL MEC rep the very same question about longevity. Take it for what you will:

"Upgrading 1437 pilots conceivably to much higher pay scales eats into the pie of what the contract costs the company. The company and union pull and shove about how many dollars they want to allocate to various areas of the contract. The union writes contracts to favor the majority in order to effect passage."
Translation:

"We are afraid of anything that might remotely affect SLI, including our own shadow, so we have been fighting the UAL MEC over longevity (for pay) since day one."
Reply
Old 10-08-2012 | 07:37 AM
  #9  
Richiscool's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 58
Likes: 0
From: New Hire Furlough
Default

Originally Posted by embflieger
Delta got it. No reason we shouldn't. I know mgmt won't see it that way.
I feel Delta is more of the exception, rather than the rule.
Reply
Old 10-08-2012 | 08:06 AM
  #10  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 375
Likes: 0
From: B744 FO
Default

I think Kalitta kept longevity through furlough.....
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Guard Dude
Delta
201736
04-06-2022 06:59 AM
THEBRICK
Major
37
09-16-2011 07:07 AM
ShyGuy
Regional
412
06-05-2011 02:16 PM
Joe Walsh
Regional
2
06-22-2009 05:54 PM
Senior Skipper
Hangar Talk
7
06-14-2008 02:17 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices