Airline Pilot Central Forums

Airline Pilot Central Forums (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/)
-   United (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/united/)
-   -   B-787 Delay reason (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/united/70907-b-787-delay-reason.html)

flyboycpa 11-02-2012 04:52 PM

B-787 Delay reason
 
For a break from the jabber of the merger, seniority, hiring, etc..

I spoke to a Boeing engineer today at a bookstore in SEA. He said the delay on our 2nd aircraft was due to the [American] seat supplier providing the incorrect seating. Boeing ended up robbing the correct seating already in place on the 3rd aircraft (which isn't ready for delivery) and replacing the seats in the 2nd aircraft so we could take delivery this week.

Also, he said that the 787-9 just started initial construction and it's nothing more than simple fuselage plugs. No changes to the wing. It should fly next year. One overseas carrier is pushing hard for the 787-10 and it holds the same passenger capacity as a 777-200.

Also in the Boeing drawing boards is a 777-400 which should be quite a people-hauler.

I'm sure somehow this thread will be turned into something negative, so have at it.

ERJF15 11-02-2012 05:10 PM

777-400?
 
http://memberfiles.freewebs.com/61/2.../777-400ER.png


DAYYYYUUUUMMMM!

bearcat 11-02-2012 07:37 PM


Originally Posted by flyboycpa (Post 1286721)
For a break from the jabber of the merger, seniority, hiring, etc..

I spoke to a Boeing engineer today at a bookstore in SEA. He said the delay on our 2nd aircraft was due to the [American] seat supplier providing the incorrect seating. Boeing ended up robbing the correct seating already in place on the 3rd aircraft (which isn't ready for delivery) and replacing the seats in the 2nd aircraft so we could take delivery this week.

Also, he said that the 787-9 just started initial construction and it's nothing more than simple fuselage plugs. No changes to the wing. It should fly next year. One overseas carrier is pushing hard for the 787-10 and it holds the same passenger capacity as a 777-200.

Also in the Boeing drawing boards is a 777-400 which should be quite a people-hauler.

I'm sure somehow this thread will be turned into something negative, so have at it.

these forums are somewhat of a mob aren't they?

TheFly 11-02-2012 08:00 PM

Looks rather A340-600ish.

APC225 11-02-2012 08:13 PM

Well, at least they get their publicity shot
 
CHICAGO, Nov. 2, 2012 /PRNewswire/ -- United Airlines today announced that the
company has successfully completed the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA)
certification process for its 787 Dreamliner. United can now begin flying the
Dreamliner for passenger service, beginning with its inaugural 787 commercial
flight departing Houston for Chicago Nov. 4 at 7:20 a.m. CST.

socalflyboy 11-03-2012 04:38 PM


Originally Posted by ERJF15 (Post 1286726)

Sweet! I'd fly that for delta minus something!

Groundhog 11-03-2012 08:49 PM


Originally Posted by socalflyboy (Post 1287080)
Sweet! I'd fly that for delta minus something!


Of course you would. And management knows it.

Hog

SONORA PASS 11-04-2012 01:05 AM


Originally Posted by socalflyboy (Post 1287080)
Sweet! I'd fly that for delta minus something!

Delta minus the hat works...

SP

socalflyboy 11-04-2012 11:32 AM


Originally Posted by Groundhog (Post 1287220)
Of course you would. And management knows it.

Hog

Dang slice...listen real hard...yeah, that's right, you got it now..SARCASM. Mgt doesn't know me that well. Unfortunately your response is spot on for some of my brethren.


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:17 AM.


User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2024 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Website Copyright ©2000 - 2017 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands