Is the SLI already done?
Section 6 - Seniority
6-A General 6-A-1 A Pilot shall be placed and shall retain his relative seniority position on the United Pilot Seniority List (the “Seniority List”) effective on the date of hire as a Pilot with the Company. A Pilot shall remain on the Seniority List from such date except as provided in this Agreement. The above is cut and pasted from the new JCBA. Does this mean the SLI is already done? The UAL and CAL sides both voted on it. Please don't flame me for this, but this is from the contract. I won't argue one way or another how it should be done. Maybe JP was so busy trying to write LOA 25, he forgot to read the fine print........... |
Originally Posted by Probe
(Post 1313893)
Section 6 - Seniority
6-A General 6-A-1 A Pilot shall be placed and shall retain his relative seniority position on the United Pilot Seniority List (the “Seniority List”) effective on the date of hire as a Pilot with the Company. A Pilot shall remain on the Seniority List from such date except as provided in this Agreement. The above is cut and pasted from the new JCBA. Does this mean the SLI is already done? The UAL and CAL sides both voted on it. Please don't flame me for this, but this is from the contract. I won't argue one way or another how it should be done. Maybe JP was so busy trying to write LOA 25, he forgot to read the fine print........... |
To some like EWRGuppyFO it is already a foregone conclusion. It will be relative seniority and that is it.
|
Originally Posted by A320
(Post 1313963)
To some like EWRGuppyFO it is already a foregone conclusion. It will be relative seniority and that is it.
|
So the 85' hires at CAL should just help themselves to the widebody seats at UAL then???? :D
|
Originally Posted by osuav8r
(Post 1314015)
So the 85' hires at CAL should just help themselves to the widebody seats at UAL then???? :D
|
Originally Posted by tailwheel48
(Post 1314070)
The '85 hires at CAL already hold widebody!
|
Originally Posted by LAX Pilot
(Post 1314001)
LOLZ. Not going to happen... That's not in ALPA merger policy and clearly doesn't work with the aircraft ratios...
|
Originally Posted by Free Bird
(Post 1314201)
It may not be ALPA merger policy; however, most recent ALPA mergers have strongly resembled a relative list with a couple of exceptions. If this goes to arbitration, and my guess is it probably will, expect something close to relative. Just my .02
Don't get all ****y...its just an opinion. |
Originally Posted by A320
(Post 1313963)
To some like EWRGuppyFO it is already a foregone conclusion. It will be relative seniority and that is it.
Easy Beavis. I'm not arguing one way or the other. I already had my say in the one thing I could say on. Didn't go my way. Besides, didn't you already get the pdf file that had the relative seniority already figured out for both airlines? :eek: |
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:47 AM. |
User Alert System provided by
Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) -
vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2024 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Website Copyright ©2000 - 2017 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands