Airline Pilot Central Forums

Airline Pilot Central Forums (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/)
-   United (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/united/)
-   -   Is the SLI already done? (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/united/71820-sli-already-done.html)

Probe 12-17-2012 06:29 PM

Is the SLI already done?
 
Section 6 - Seniority
6-A General
6-A-1 A Pilot shall be placed and shall retain his relative seniority position on the United Pilot
Seniority List (the “Seniority List”) effective on the date of hire as a Pilot with the Company. A
Pilot shall remain on the Seniority List from such date except as provided in this Agreement.



The above is cut and pasted from the new JCBA. Does this mean the SLI is already done? The UAL and CAL sides both voted on it.

Please don't flame me for this, but this is from the contract. I won't argue one way or another how it should be done.

Maybe JP was so busy trying to write LOA 25, he forgot to read the fine print...........

LAX Pilot 12-17-2012 07:40 PM


Originally Posted by Probe (Post 1313893)
Section 6 - Seniority
6-A General
6-A-1 A Pilot shall be placed and shall retain his relative seniority position on the United Pilot
Seniority List (the “Seniority List”) effective on the date of hire as a Pilot with the Company. A
Pilot shall remain on the Seniority List from such date except as provided in this Agreement.



The above is cut and pasted from the new JCBA. Does this mean the SLI is already done? The UAL and CAL sides both voted on it.

Please don't flame me for this, but this is from the contract. I won't argue one way or another how it should be done.

Maybe JP was so busy trying to write LOA 25, he forgot to read the fine print...........

We should do SLI randomly just to make things interesting. Just put all the names is a spreadsheet and hit a button and they get scrambled....

A320 12-17-2012 08:16 PM

To some like EWRGuppyFO it is already a foregone conclusion. It will be relative seniority and that is it.

LAX Pilot 12-17-2012 09:27 PM


Originally Posted by A320 (Post 1313963)
To some like EWRGuppyFO it is already a foregone conclusion. It will be relative seniority and that is it.

LOLZ. Not going to happen... That's not in ALPA merger policy and clearly doesn't work with the aircraft ratios...

osuav8r 12-17-2012 10:09 PM

So the 85' hires at CAL should just help themselves to the widebody seats at UAL then???? :D

tailwheel48 12-18-2012 04:57 AM


Originally Posted by osuav8r (Post 1314015)
So the 85' hires at CAL should just help themselves to the widebody seats at UAL then???? :D

The '85 hires at CAL already hold widebody!

LeeMat 12-18-2012 06:28 AM


Originally Posted by tailwheel48 (Post 1314070)
The '85 hires at CAL already hold widebody!

Yeah but now there will be THREE times more wide body positions available!

Free Bird 12-18-2012 07:50 AM


Originally Posted by LAX Pilot (Post 1314001)
LOLZ. Not going to happen... That's not in ALPA merger policy and clearly doesn't work with the aircraft ratios...

It may not be ALPA merger policy; however, most recent ALPA mergers have strongly resembled a relative list with a couple of exceptions. If this goes to arbitration, and my guess is it probably will, expect something close to relative. Just my .02

Wrsofked 12-18-2012 08:30 AM


Originally Posted by Free Bird (Post 1314201)
It may not be ALPA merger policy; however, most recent ALPA mergers have strongly resembled a relative list with a couple of exceptions. If this goes to arbitration, and my guess is it probably will, expect something close to relative. Just my .02

I see it coming out fairly relatively, with junior UAL guys getting a bit of a bump upward due to their longevity of ACTIVE service over the same relative CAL pilots. There will be some other factors that affect the placement by small percentages ie..career expectations. I don't see a windfall in the cards for either group, regardless of what ALPA merger policy is.

Don't get all ****y...its just an opinion.

EWR73FO 12-18-2012 10:40 AM


Originally Posted by A320 (Post 1313963)
To some like EWRGuppyFO it is already a foregone conclusion. It will be relative seniority and that is it.


Easy Beavis. I'm not arguing one way or the other. I already had my say in the one thing I could say on. Didn't go my way. Besides, didn't you already get the pdf file that had the relative seniority already figured out for both airlines? :eek:


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:47 AM.


User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2024 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Website Copyright ©2000 - 2017 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands