![]() |
Originally Posted by buscappy
(Post 2212820)
or just call all 767 variants "seven six seven" and all 737 variants "guppy"
cracks me up listening to guys talk about their "nine hundred max nex gen" and then they go hop in a 1960s guppy |
Originally Posted by sleeves
(Post 2212834)
Nobody talks about,"Their 900 max next gen" as it is not available to airlines. The Max is only being flown by Boing right now. While the NG's are quite different from the classics, I call all of the 737's a seven three....just like all the other airlines that fly them do.
|
Originally Posted by sleeves
(Post 2212834)
Nobody talks about,"Their 900 max next gen" as it is not available to airlines. The Max is only being flown by Boing right now. While the NG's are quite different from the classics, I call all of the 737's a seven three....just like all the other airlines that fly them do.
Chairman |
Originally Posted by sleeves
(Post 2212834)
...While the NG's are quite different from the classics, I call all of the 737's a seven three....just like all the other airlines that fly them do.
http://www.b737.org.uk/images/paneloverhead_737-700.jpg http://pictures.ozy.com/pictures/768...-isuzujoe2.jpg sorry, slow night. |
Wow someone revived a 3 year old thread to slam the writer? Stranger things have happened on the web.
For UAL pilots there was a day when we had the "rope start" and the "400" on the property. Both are variants of the "whale" and represented the biggest airplanes. At the bottom end we had the "guppy," which came in two variants, "thunder" and "yuppie" (with some of the late sixties pilots calling it "fat Albert" before the Blue Angels named their C-130 that). Oh and I forgot to mention the "standard," "stretch" and "advanced" versions of the "three holer." Must be a "millennial" who complained about the precision of a "boomer" while ignoring completely the "X." Why are some people so sensitive about a 767 of any size? It's just another comfortable, boring, two engine, and automated jet. If we really loved it we'd give it a handle. :cool: |
Originally Posted by Regularguy
(Post 2212983)
Why are some people so sensitive about a 767 of any size? It's just another comfortable, boring, two engine, and automated jet. If we really loved it we'd give it a handle.
:cool: |
There is a very good reason the 747-400 was referred to as he "400". When we had both the rope start 747-200 and the 747-400 the equipment designator in unimatic was "747" for the rope start and "400" for the 747-400. If you wanted to bid one of the airplanes you had to put either "400" or "747" typed manually into the green screen. Same for looking at pairings in unimatic. Green screen required manual entries and thus a pilot was a "400" person to identify which equipment they were flying. Just like we called the 757/767 "767" because it came on the property first and that was the identifier in unimatic for bidding and looking at pairings.
It was not some great cosnpiracy to evoke superiority. It was just what the programmers used to identify the different fleets and seats. |
Originally Posted by Lambourne
(Post 2213019)
There is a very good reason the 747-400 was referred to as he "400". When we had both the rope start 747-200 and the 747-400 the equipment designator in unimatic was "747" for the rope start and "400" for the 747-400. If you wanted to bid one of the airplanes you had to put either "400" or "747" typed manually into the green screen. Same for looking at pairings in unimatic. Green screen required manual entries and thus a pilot was a "400" person to identify which equipment they were flying. Just like we called the 757/767 "767" because it came on the property first and that was the identifier in unimatic for bidding and looking at pairings.
It was not some great cosnpiracy to evoke superiority. It was just what the programmers used to identify the different fleets and seats. |
Originally Posted by Deafguppy
(Post 2213035)
That sheds some light on things to this LCAL guy. I'm flying with a LUAL captain now and we are having a great time on the 73, thirty-seven, Super Guppy, whatever.
|
Originally Posted by LAX Pilot
(Post 1463071)
Jeff is one of the equities CAL brought to the merger. I wonder why they didn't bring that up during the ISL hearings?
How much of a negative adjustment gets to be made for forcing him on us? |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:46 AM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands