Thoughts on BAT?
#11
Well, I didn't mean for this to turn into yet another seniority/SLI argument thread.
Just wanted to get opinions on how some felt about how now EWR based 756 pilots will have to cover all three airports, and if it had any influence on whether to do BAT or not...
Just wanted to get opinions on how some felt about how now EWR based 756 pilots will have to cover all three airports, and if it had any influence on whether to do BAT or not...
#12
Line Holder
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 74
Likes: 0
From: 756 CAP
I don't spend much time on this forum, but the CAL whining about "super seniority" in this thread got me out of the wood work. I was hired at UAL in 1996. I was integrated with CAL 1998 hires. Tell me again how I got super seniority? These pilots are mostly younger and all were hired after me and will now be senior to me for the rest of my career. Yet, I'm not whining about how CAL screwed us. We ALL got screwed in our own special way, that's what makes this SLI even remotely fair. Get over it.
#13
Line Holder
Joined: Sep 2013
Posts: 64
Likes: 0
I don't spend much time on this forum, but the CAL whining about "super seniority" in this thread got me out of the wood work. I was hired at UAL in 1996. I was integrated with CAL 1998 hires. Tell me again how I got super seniority? These pilots are mostly younger and all were hired after me and will now be senior to me for the rest of my career. Yet, I'm not whining about how CAL screwed us. We ALL got screwed in our own special way, that's what makes this SLI even remotely fair. Get over it.
Having said that, those same guys hired on in 98 you are complaining about were able to hold 756 CA, what position were you holding the day before the SLI award?
This was the most egregious SLI "award" in the history of the airlines and you know it and I know it. As for the get over it comment....easy for the windfall side to say huh? I'll do what I believe is the right thing to do....not what you believe.
#15
I don't spend much time on this forum, but the CAL whining about "super seniority" in this thread got me out of the wood work. I was hired at UAL in 1996. I was integrated with CAL 1998 hires. Tell me again how I got super seniority? These pilots are mostly younger and all were hired after me and will now be senior to me for the rest of my career. Yet, I'm not whining about how CAL screwed us. We ALL got screwed in our own special way, that's what makes this SLI even remotely fair. Get over it.
Again, this is not a SLI thread. Wolfman, what can I say... follow Shreks advice. If you feel you were that bent over, join the lawsuit, work a bunch of OT and contribute that extra cash to the fund...
#16
Line Holder
Joined: Sep 2013
Posts: 64
Likes: 0
Consider yourself "lucky". There are UAL 97 hires with CAL 2005 hires senior to them.
Again, this is not a SLI thread. Wolfman, what can I say... follow Shreks advice. If you feel you were that bent over, join the lawsuit, work a bunch of OT and contribute that extra cash to the fund...
Again, this is not a SLI thread. Wolfman, what can I say... follow Shreks advice. If you feel you were that bent over, join the lawsuit, work a bunch of OT and contribute that extra cash to the fund...
Again, regarding all you're well meant comments about how I should "get over it" and "join the lawsuit", you might find this difficult to believe with your background as a legacy United, but I'll do what I believe is best for me and my family, not what a United pilot thinks I should do.
#17
Line Holder
Joined: Sep 2013
Posts: 64
Likes: 0
Glad you think it worked out okay for you, but I hope you realize you are in the extreme minority opinion as a former CAL pilot.
#19
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
vagabond
Hangar Talk
14
04-25-2007 09:09 AM



