Originally Posted by avi8tor4life
(Post 1755361)
Who cares!!! Just get them at mainline!!!
|
So if the pay was halved again that would still be OK? I care, and I'm junior.
We need to stop allowing companies to pay us LESS and rationalizing why its OK to do so. We make half of what we used to if you look at the entire compensation package. Sure, we need the planes but not at any cost. The current 190 pay rates are just a continuation of the B scale. |
Originally Posted by cadetdrivr
(Post 1755345)
IMHO, three reasons for UA not to buy FR:
1) It's not exactly a common fleet (FR has different motors than UA) 2) One can lease 60 used Airbuses for the same market rate that FR is paying but without the expense or complications associated with buying an entire airline. Why buy the cow when there's plenty of milk on sale? 3) Potential anti-trust issues with dominant DEN market share 1) When you have fleets that big, common engines don't really matter. Plenty of airlines do just fine with mixed engine fleets. 2) Yes, you probably could, but there aren't 60 used Airbuses out there for immediate lease. Thats seems like its the original problem here. 3) Even with FR and UA combined, it'd probably be lower total market share than a lot of other fortress hubs thanks to WN and all the other airlines at DEN. And I'm sure they could give up some assets here and there to make the government happy. Not saying its the solution, but seems to me like at neat idea at least. |
Originally Posted by socalflyboy
(Post 1755333)
Wow...guppy boy f/o pays more...go figure that one...what is jet blues 190 Cappy rates.
EMB190 CA 1st year-max out: 124.26-135.36 190 FO 68.08-92.44 JB, 2015 JB 190 CA 1st year-max-out 131.10-176.09 190 FO 49.56-119.72 Granted, UAL 195 rate is HIGHER, but doesn't meet the JB rate. I agree with the mantra, "just get them on property!!!!!!" I'm ALSO smart enough to know that "it's not ALL about the hourly rate". DC, 401K, health insurance, career/income progression at a company with MULTIPLE fleets on property vs. 2, whatever. But again, the mantra at a legacy is "WE HAVE TO HAVE EVERYTHING BETTER THAN A LCC!!!!!!! EVERYTHING!!!!!!" But I would NEVER disagree that the UAL rates SUCK. |
Originally Posted by cadetdrivr
(Post 1755345)
IMHO, three reasons for UA not to buy FR:
1) It's not exactly a common fleet (FR has different motors than UA) 2) One can lease 60 used Airbuses for the same market rate that FR is paying but without the expense or complications associated with buying an entire airline. Why buy the cow when there's plenty of milk on sale? 3) Potential anti-trust issues with dominant DEN market share |
Originally Posted by pilot64golfer
(Post 1755500)
90% of all passenger departures out of MSP are Delta. That's not a monopoly?
Not so much the case for more recent mergers, with perhaps the best example being the slot swaps on the east coast that resulted from the AA/USAir merger. Heck, even UCH had to give up some EWR slots. |
Originally Posted by WS01
(Post 1755331)
With the E190 top CA pay of $135 / hr :eek: (starting 01/2015) that will make for some pretty junior captains..
Also 1st and 2nd year fo pay is the same :eek: no raise for new hire until year 3 if hired and stay on the E190!! Don t get me wrong, I d rather see more planes for mainline but this pay sucks.. |
Just get them on property guys.
|
But if we get them on property scope choke proved to work. We have guys that rather prove ALPA wrong than get jobs at mainline.
|
Originally Posted by Thor
(Post 1755864)
Really? Who, which "guys"?
|
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:41 PM. |
User Alert System provided by
Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) -
vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2024 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Website Copyright ©2000 - 2017 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands