Search

Notices

Fuel Hedging Losses

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-21-2015 | 10:29 AM
  #1  
Thread Starter
Don't say Guppy
 
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 1,926
Likes: 0
From: Guppy driver
Default Fuel Hedging Losses

Any bets on UAL's potential fuel hedging losses? DAL is doing a great job of claiming they made a lot of money in the 4th quarter, except for those pesky hedges. With those, they lost 700 million. But they did liquidate a lot of 2015 hedge positions. They brought those losses "forward". This might have been a mistake, but at least their accountants are being honest.

After perusing a bunch of different airline and business sites, UAL is going to "bring foreword" 2% of their 2015 hedges into 4 qtr results. Their guidance is this will add .08 cents per gallon to 4th qtr fuel prices. The cost basis of this estimate was not given.

But my basic math ability tells me that if they used the same cost basis, and brought 100% of 2015 hedges foreword and realized the losses now, it would be a loss of about, aheeemmmm, 5 billion dollars.

I also read that there was one or two airlines that are so underwater on their no cost "collars", that they are getting margin calls on their accounts. The same article said they were struggling to arrange enough collateral to satisfy their brokerage house.

I would suggest we start a pool, but we only have a day or two to start it.

I hope I am wrong.
Reply
Old 01-21-2015 | 11:19 AM
  #2  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 5,488
Likes: 98
Default

Originally Posted by Probe
Any bets on UAL's potential fuel hedging losses? DAL is doing a great job of claiming they made a lot of money in the 4th quarter, except for those pesky hedges. With those, they lost 700 million. But they did liquidate a lot of 2015 hedge positions. They brought those losses "forward". This might have been a mistake, but at least their accountants are being honest.

After perusing a bunch of different airline and business sites, UAL is going to "bring foreword" 2% of their 2015 hedges into 4 qtr results. Their guidance is this will add .08 cents per gallon to 4th qtr fuel prices. The cost basis of this estimate was not given.

But my basic math ability tells me that if they used the same cost basis, and brought 100% of 2015 hedges foreword and realized the losses now, it would be a loss of about, aheeemmmm, 5 billion dollars.

I also read that there was one or two airlines that are so underwater on their no cost "collars", that they are getting margin calls on their accounts. The same article said they were struggling to arrange enough collateral to satisfy their brokerage house.


I would suggest we start a pool, but we only have a day or two to start it.

I hope I am wrong.
That could be devastating. I really hope UAL isn't one of them. I read somewhere that we weren't nearly as hedged as a few others. Guess we'll find out tomorrow.
Reply
Old 01-21-2015 | 11:59 AM
  #3  
cadetdrivr's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 2,639
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Grumble
Guess we'll find out tomorrow.
We will.

FWIW, there is one analyst report out there that claims to have calculated DAL's hedge loss at $2B, SWA's at $500M, and UAL's at $200M. UAL's seems low, IMHO, but it would nice to be pleasantly surprised and beat DAL at something. Should be interesting to say the least.

As a side note, airlines need to continually "mark to market" all their hedging positions for their financial reports which is why DAL has to take such a huge hit all at once. If oil goes back to "normal" later this year they could instantly show huge a change in their positions.

Edit--(found the quote): "Among airlines, American (NASDAQ:AAL) should not suffer the cost headwinds related to mark-to-market hedge losses, unlike peers that hedge jet fuel; Delta can expect a $2B hedge-related loss, Southwest should see a $500M loss and United a $200M loss."

Last edited by cadetdrivr; 01-21-2015 at 12:17 PM.
Reply
Old 01-21-2015 | 01:13 PM
  #4  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 1,168
Likes: 0
From: Gets weekends off
Default

DAL has the worst fuel hedging position according to Forbes.
Reply
Old 01-21-2015 | 08:11 PM
  #5  
Thread Starter
Don't say Guppy
 
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 1,926
Likes: 0
From: Guppy driver
Default

Yes, they have to "Mark to Market", but in accounting, it is an opinion, even though they are supposed to be following the rules. Also, they can "settle" futures contracts early. Did DAL and UAL do this? I believe I read that UAL settled 2% of 2015 positions early and counted that towards 4th quarter earnings.

What is a little disturbing is how little coverage this is getting. DAL is claiming victory in operating income for the 4th quarter, even though they lost over 700 million when you include those pesky little special items like fuel hedges. 2 billion worth.

I did not see whether DAL settled their contracts early, or just had to account for the potential losses on their earnings report. Apparrantly their refinery purchase has been a disaster as well. In addition to needing hundreds of millions in refurbishment, they are spending millions in "ethanol credits" as their refinery is not capable of mixing ethanol.

I am trying to find the article I read a couple of days ago. It named LUV and DAL and how much they lost. It also mentioned 2 other anonymous airlines that have lost so much they are scrambling for collateral to post for the margin calls they are getting.

Nothing like loosing your arse in the middle of the biggest airline revenue boom in 20 years.

How is that fuels savings program going? Single engine taxi?
Reply
Old 01-22-2015 | 09:10 AM
  #6  
CousinEddie's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 1,091
Likes: 1
Default

Originally Posted by Probe
Yes, they have to "Mark to Market", but in accounting, it is an opinion, even though they are supposed to be following the rules. Also, they can "settle" futures contracts early. Did DAL and UAL do this? I believe I read that UAL settled 2% of 2015 positions early and counted that towards 4th quarter earnings.

What is a little disturbing is how little coverage this is getting. DAL is claiming victory in operating income for the 4th quarter, even though they lost over 700 million when you include those pesky little special items like fuel hedges. 2 billion worth.

I did not see whether DAL settled their contracts early, or just had to account for the potential losses on their earnings report. Apparrantly their refinery purchase has been a disaster as well. In addition to needing hundreds of millions in refurbishment, they are spending millions in "ethanol credits" as their refinery is not capable of mixing ethanol.

I am trying to find the article I read a couple of days ago. It named LUV and DAL and how much they lost. It also mentioned 2 other anonymous airlines that have lost so much they are scrambling for collateral to post for the margin calls they are getting.

Nothing like loosing your arse in the middle of the biggest airline revenue boom in 20 years.

How is that fuels savings program going? Single engine taxi?
Yes, why not? What do you do in the long line for departure on 4L at EWR for example?
Reply
Old 01-22-2015 | 09:27 AM
  #7  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 943
Likes: 0
From: 747 Captain, retired
Default

Originally Posted by Probe
Yes, they have to "Mark to Market", but in accounting, it is an opinion, even though they are supposed to be following the rules. Also, they can "settle" futures contracts early. Did DAL and UAL do this? I believe I read that UAL settled 2% of 2015 positions early and counted that towards 4th quarter earnings.

What is a little disturbing is how little coverage this is getting. DAL is claiming victory in operating income for the 4th quarter, even though they lost over 700 million when you include those pesky little special items like fuel hedges. 2 billion worth.

I did not see whether DAL settled their contracts early, or just had to account for the potential losses on their earnings report. Apparrantly their refinery purchase has been a disaster as well. In addition to needing hundreds of millions in refurbishment, they are spending millions in "ethanol credits" as their refinery is not capable of mixing ethanol.

I am trying to find the article I read a couple of days ago. It named LUV and DAL and how much they lost. It also mentioned 2 other anonymous airlines that have lost so much they are scrambling for collateral to post for the margin calls they are getting.

Nothing like loosing your arse in the middle of the biggest airline revenue boom in 20 years.

How is that fuels savings program going? Single engine taxi?
I'm not ready to hammer UAL on their hedging losses. A hedge is simply a bet they made at an attempt to control costs. It could have went the other way. How many out there are buying oil futures or options? The point is that the oil market is very unpredictable because it's not a true supply and demand calculation.

Last edited by krudawg; 01-22-2015 at 09:28 AM. Reason: grammar
Reply
Old 01-22-2015 | 09:41 AM
  #8  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 880
Likes: 0
Default

I'm curious to see what Southwest's position is/was?
Reply
Old 01-22-2015 | 10:57 AM
  #9  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 1,168
Likes: 0
From: Gets weekends off
Default

Originally Posted by flybynuts
I'm curious to see what Southwest's position is/was?
Worse than ours. They hedged heavily against rising prices. Delta hedged the most. American almost none at all. We surprisingly less than Southwest, so we get more benefit from the drop in fuel prices.
Reply
Old 01-22-2015 | 12:15 PM
  #10  
Sunvox's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 1,725
Likes: 0
From: UAL retired
Default

MTM losses from fuel hedges settling in future periods and prior period gains (losses) on fuel contracts settled in the current period: The company utilizes certain derivative instruments that are economic hedges but do not qualify for hedge accounting under U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. The company records changes in the fair value of these economic hedges to Nonoperating income (expense): Miscellaneous, net in the statements of consolidated operations. During the three and twelve months ended December 31, 2014, the company recorded $225 million and $244 million, respectively, in MTM losses on economic hedges that will settle in future periods. For economic hedges that settled in the three and twelve months ended December 31, 2014, the company recorded MTM gains (losses) of ($18) million and $83 million, respectively, in prior periods. The figures above also include an insignificant amount of ineffectiveness on hedges that are designated for hedge accounting.
($244)
+($83)
______
($327) million for past and future hedges.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Golden Bear
Military
86
04-18-2013 09:06 PM
⌐ AV8OR WANNABE
Foreign
0
08-05-2008 11:05 AM
WEACLRS
Major
13
07-24-2008 09:42 PM
MDT06
Major
32
07-16-2008 06:37 PM
Opus
Major
32
03-16-2008 06:34 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices