![]() |
Originally Posted by YAKflyer
(Post 1943758)
If your numbers are correct, I wonder if the relatively low percentage of 91/135 pilots is reflective of the numbers that apply. I am under the impression most corporate guys are pretty happy and comfortable where they are.
Even guys in top jobs are applying to the airlines, having a schedule is a huge QOL issue and is what makes the airline career so attractive. |
Hey Liberty,
Your ambition and eagerness is great, but I think you are overthinking this. The majors don't know which flight departments are good and which are bad. They don't know if flying a citation X or GIV is more prestigious. They know total time, PIC time and additional duties AKA director of safety, chief pilot, etc. At the regionals or in the military they are more opportunities to put extra stuff on your resume. Even trivial "special projects" stuff counts. I think that the 121 badge would help, but an additional title at your current job would be as beneficial, even if it's unpaid. My $.02 |
My experience is many 121 hiring folks have zero idea what the difference in capability is between, say, a Citation XLS and a Falcon 2000EX.
|
Originally Posted by BoilerUP
(Post 1944021)
My experience is many 121 hiring folks have zero idea what the difference in capability is between, say, a Citation XLS and a Falcon 2000EX.
|
Originally Posted by duvie
(Post 1944014)
Hey Liberty,
Your ambition and eagerness is great, but I think you are overthinking this. The majors don't know which flight departments are good and which are bad. They don't know if flying a citation X or GIV is more prestigious. They know total time, PIC time and additional duties AKA director of safety, chief pilot, etc. At the regionals or in the military they are more opportunities to put extra stuff on your resume. Even trivial "special projects" stuff counts. I think that the 121 badge would help, but an additional title at your current job would be as beneficial, even if it's unpaid. My $.02 |
Originally Posted by BoilerUP
(Post 1944021)
My experience is many 121 hiring folks have zero idea what the difference in capability is between, say, a Citation XLS and a Falcon 2000EX.
|
Of course, ALPA forgets about the [corporate/fractional/charter] 91/135 guys in their charts as ALPA thinks that the only civilian pilots are ex-ERAU, current Part 121 pukes.
My new hire [Continental] class in 2007 had quite a few 91/135 guys in it. Not sure why everyone thinks that 135 guys don't have college degrees :cool: |
Originally Posted by flyboycpa
(Post 1944214)
Of course, ALPA forgets about the [corporate/fractional/charter] 91/135 guys in their charts as ALPA thinks that the only civilian pilots are ex-ERAU, current Part 121 pukes.
My new hire [Continental] class in 2007 had quite a few 91/135 guys in it. Not sure why everyone thinks that 135 guys don't have college degrees :cool: As far as the military/civilian/121/135/91 thing, it's always been airline specific. Usually the quality of the airline dictates the pool and the quality of the hires but when times get tough anything goes. |
LOL. Like in 1985.
|
Yes, the 570 were likely some of the best hired at UAL. As it turns out many from that group will have long careers at United. With the FAA age changes, quiet a few will have 40+ years and dominating the top of the seniority list for some time. :D
|
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:32 AM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands