![]() |
Originally Posted by CALFO
(Post 1958896)
This has been the plan all along. The only bumps needed will be 777 SFO and possible some very junior Sfo 787 pilots. The company played this perfectly.
|
Originally Posted by Probe
(Post 1958832)
Howie needs to have someone shed some light on him.
Bumping 777 West Coast, 787 IAH? This should be fun to watch. Even more pilots getting paid to do nothing, and others getting 150 hours a month. I think Manpower finally got a clue, that they haven't got a clue. Even they can't figure out what to do now. Vacancy? Displacement? Homina, Homina, Homina, Homina, Homina, Homina................... Apparently, now that their negotiations are going to mediation, the timeline for contract/ISL completion is far enough out in the future that they are going ahead with the original (i.e optimized) fleet plan. Unfortunately, this new plan is going to be more of a hardship on the FA's vice the temporary (i.e non optimized) fleet plan. Mgmt was willing to temporarily live with it until the F/A ISL, that's now not going to happen anytime soon. I hope what I was told the (shameful) reason for the breakdown isn't true. |
Originally Posted by boxer6
(Post 1959125)
My understanding is all this seeming confusion is interrelated with the F/A's contract that was predicted to be finished by now.
Apparently, now that their negotiations are going to mediation, the timeline for contract/ISL completion is far enough out in the future that they are going ahead with the original (i.e optimized) fleet plan. Unfortunately, this new plan is going to be more of a hardship on the FA's vice the temporary (i.e non optimized) fleet plan. Mgmt was willing to temporarily live with it until the F/A ISL, that's now not going to happen anytime soon. I hope what I was told the (shameful) reason for the breakdown isn't true. |
Originally Posted by Probe
(Post 1959638)
Do tell. What is the shameful reason?
|
Originally Posted by boxer6
(Post 1959681)
Not appropriate (especially here) as it was information with more than one degree of separation. Threw it out there so if one is curious enough, they can probe (no pun intended) into it themselves. Myself, I'm curious how the Pension issue is going.
|
Originally Posted by Hilltopper89
(Post 1959743)
I'm just a <3 years on property line pilot so I know next to nothing. 2 things come to mind: it seems lots of FAs I talk with don't want a contract...on both sides. And I don't get how we're nickel and diming everything, don't have a technician or FA contract, but we're buying back stock.
Positive rate, gear up.............. |
I just read in the news a couple of hours ago, United wants to get our on-time and reliability rankings up with Delta.
Their brilliant idea? More technology, and IT solutions. |
Originally Posted by Probe
(Post 1959801)
I just read in the news a couple of hours ago, United wants to get our on-time and reliability rankings up with Delta.
Their brilliant idea? More technology, and IT solutions. |
Originally Posted by Hilltopper89
(Post 1959743)
I'm just a <3 years on property line pilot so I know next to nothing. 2 things come to mind: it seems lots of FAs I talk with don't want a contract...on both sides. And I don't get how we're nickel and diming everything, don't have a technician or FA contract, but we're buying back stock.
You see, if your mgmt with millions in stock and options for more stock, your best way to get a raise without a "raise" in salary is to use company money to buy back stock which notionally raises the value of the outstanding shares and options and doesn't get the notice of the employees and ire of the shareholders because they benefit as well. |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:09 AM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands