Airline Pilot Central Forums

Airline Pilot Central Forums (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/)
-   United (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/united/)
-   -   UAL LAX Base (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/united/90657-ual-lax-base.html)

Kenny Powers 09-17-2015 06:02 AM

UAL LAX Base
 
Anyone have an idea of how long it would take to hold LAX as a new-hire. How many years of reserve after that? Also what fleet is based there? Is it a pretty good mixture of flying?

Thanks!

MasterOfPuppets 09-17-2015 06:28 AM


Originally Posted by Kenny Powers (Post 1973219)
Anyone have an idea of how long it would take to hold LAX as a new-hire. How many years of reserve after that? Also what fleet is based there? Is it a pretty good mixture of flying?

Thanks!

1. Almost immediately
2. No way to tell how long on reserve.
3. 737/320/756/787/777(for now)
4. not as good as SFO. With the new way UA is going to schedule its crews and aircraft the flying may get worse/boring. LAX doesn't have a lot of destinations and if its all out and backs.......But, we as pilots don't know how this new scheduling technique is going to affect us yet.

Good luck getting an interview United is a great place to work.

UALfoLIFE 09-17-2015 06:45 AM

There are unfufled vacancies for lax on both the 320/737. You can get it as a newhire. I was hired in April of this year and will be close to being a bottom line holder by December on the bus.

Kenny Powers 09-17-2015 08:25 AM


Originally Posted by MasterOfPuppets (Post 1973238)
1. Almost immediately
2. No way to tell how long on reserve.
3. 737/320/756/787/777(for now)
4. not as good as SFO. With the new way UA is going to schedule its crews and aircraft the flying may get worse/boring. LAX doesn't have a lot of destinations and if its all out and backs.......But, we as pilots don't know how this new scheduling technique is going to affect us yet.

Good luck getting an interview United is a great place to work.

Thanks for the info! Out and backs sound great if you live locally, no?

MasterOfPuppets 09-17-2015 08:39 AM


Originally Posted by Kenny Powers (Post 1973351)
Thanks for the info! Out and backs sound great if you live locally, no?

well its not necessarily the crew that is being routed out and back (as in day trips) its the ships. They will go LAX - DEN - LAX -SEA - LAX.....

Instead of LAX - SEA - DEN - DSM - ORD - EWR......

How this affects the trip mix is yet to be seen. What is known is that you will be going back and forth between a single base all day then lay over at an outstation. The next day you may go to another base and then outback to that base and so on. Or you may just spend the entire trip going back and forth to LAX. That is why I said the trip mix might not be that good, due to the lack of destinations out of LAX.

They are doing this to try and keep a snow storm in EWR from affecting the entire operation. The LAX crews should be isolated along with the planes flying out of LAX that day.

We obviously need layovers for the late night arrivals/early morning departures at outstations. However, I feel that this new scheduling will greatly increase day trips and 2 day trips and cut 4+ days significantly. Well see......

Half wing 09-17-2015 12:22 PM


Originally Posted by MasterOfPuppets (Post 1973359)
well its not necessarily the crew that is being routed out and back (as in day trips) its the ships. They will go LAX - DEN - LAX -SEA - LAX.....

Instead of LAX - SEA - DEN - DSM - ORD - EWR......

How this affects the trip mix is yet to be seen. What is known is that you will be going back and forth between a single base all day then lay over at an outstation. The next day you may go to another base and then outback to that base and so on. Or you may just spend the entire trip going back and forth to LAX. That is why I said the trip mix might not be that good, due to the lack of destinations out of LAX.

They are doing this to try and keep a snow storm in EWR from affecting the entire operation. The LAX crews should be isolated along with the planes flying out of LAX that day.

We obviously need layovers for the late night arrivals/early morning departures at outstations. However, I feel that this new scheduling will greatly increase day trips and 2 day trips and cut 4+ days significantly. Well see......


Good info, thanks.

Dave Fitzgerald 09-17-2015 10:36 PM


Originally Posted by MasterOfPuppets (Post 1973359)
well its not necessarily the crew that is being routed out and back (as in day trips) its the ships. They will go LAX - DEN - LAX -SEA - LAX.....

Instead of LAX - SEA - DEN - DSM - ORD - EWR......

How this affects the trip mix is yet to be seen. What is known is that you will be going back and forth between a single base all day then lay over at an outstation. The next day you may go to another base and then outback to that base and so on. Or you may just spend the entire trip going back and forth to LAX. That is why I said the trip mix might not be that good, due to the lack of destinations out of LAX.

They are doing this to try and keep a snow storm in EWR from affecting the entire operation. The LAX crews should be isolated along with the planes flying out of LAX that day.

We obviously need layovers for the late night arrivals/early morning departures at outstations. However, I feel that this new scheduling will greatly increase day trips and 2 day trips and cut 4+ days significantly. Well see......

Almost like Shuttle flying.

Gilligan13 09-19-2015 05:29 PM

Are they planning on getting rid of the 777's?

cadetdrivr 09-19-2015 05:52 PM


Originally Posted by Gilligan13 (Post 1975128)
Are they planning on getting rid of the 777's?

Only the ones that are not ETOPS.

Spicy McHaggis 09-19-2015 07:00 PM


Originally Posted by cadetdrivr (Post 1975138)
Only the ones that are not ETOPS.


well played

Sniper66 09-19-2015 11:00 PM


Originally Posted by cadetdrivr (Post 1975138)
Only the ones that are not ETOPS.

Can you tell us which 777 is not ETOPS on the UAL fleet?

cadetdrivr 09-20-2015 04:54 AM


Originally Posted by Sniper66 (Post 1975235)
Can you tell us which 777 is not ETOPS on the UAL fleet?

Sure.

Here's the list:


End of list.

(Sorry. This whole thing was an inside joke going back five years ---shortly after the merger--- when there was a rumor floating around certain gullible CAL employees that UAL's 777s were not ETOPS.)

blockplus 09-20-2015 05:16 AM

LA is going to have a sharp reduction in 777 flying next summer and an uptic in 787 flying. The 777s are being moved east.

Aeronut2003 09-23-2015 02:17 AM

To answer the OPs question, I am in the 15 Sep class, got 737 SFO during the class bid, put in my vacancy bid for LAX and was awarded it during the first week. And there were still unfilled vacancies at LAX, so you should have no trouble getting there.

130drvr 09-23-2015 07:49 PM

How is the sleep room in LAX?

pilotgolfer 09-23-2015 08:07 PM


Originally Posted by 130drvr (Post 1977913)
How is the sleep room in LAX?

Freezing cold.

130drvr 09-24-2015 08:18 AM

But otherwise suitable for a pre-red eye nap or a pre-commute midnight nap?

pilotgolfer 09-24-2015 08:23 AM


Originally Posted by 130drvr (Post 1978174)
But otherwise suitable for a pre-red eye nap or a pre-commute midnight nap?

I've actually never used the sleep room...but the room with all the recliners is quite comfortable and it is very dark and quiet.

rv8builder 09-28-2015 09:27 PM

From a QOL standpoint, given the choices of 73/Bus and LAX/SFO, which would be the best choice to hold a line asap?

For example, would one try for 73 LAX or Airbus SFO? I'd be commuting from SLC, LAX is a slightly easier commute.

Hope my question makes sense!

RV8

Dave Fitzgerald 09-29-2015 03:15 PM

My guess would be SFO guppy. Big, getting bigger, growing fast.

757Driver 10-02-2015 07:11 AM


Originally Posted by rv8builder (Post 1981376)
From a QOL standpoint, given the choices of 73/Bus and LAX/SFO, which would be the best choice to hold a line asap?

For example, would one try for 73 LAX or Airbus SFO? I'd be commuting from SLC, LAX is a slightly easier commute.

Hope my question makes sense!

RV8

SFO 737. As pointed out above, big and getting bigger with much better flying than the A320. You'll def, hold a line much quicker in SFO.


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:39 AM.


Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands