![]() |
UAL LAX Base
Anyone have an idea of how long it would take to hold LAX as a new-hire. How many years of reserve after that? Also what fleet is based there? Is it a pretty good mixture of flying?
Thanks! |
Originally Posted by Kenny Powers
(Post 1973219)
Anyone have an idea of how long it would take to hold LAX as a new-hire. How many years of reserve after that? Also what fleet is based there? Is it a pretty good mixture of flying?
Thanks! 2. No way to tell how long on reserve. 3. 737/320/756/787/777(for now) 4. not as good as SFO. With the new way UA is going to schedule its crews and aircraft the flying may get worse/boring. LAX doesn't have a lot of destinations and if its all out and backs.......But, we as pilots don't know how this new scheduling technique is going to affect us yet. Good luck getting an interview United is a great place to work. |
There are unfufled vacancies for lax on both the 320/737. You can get it as a newhire. I was hired in April of this year and will be close to being a bottom line holder by December on the bus.
|
Originally Posted by MasterOfPuppets
(Post 1973238)
1. Almost immediately
2. No way to tell how long on reserve. 3. 737/320/756/787/777(for now) 4. not as good as SFO. With the new way UA is going to schedule its crews and aircraft the flying may get worse/boring. LAX doesn't have a lot of destinations and if its all out and backs.......But, we as pilots don't know how this new scheduling technique is going to affect us yet. Good luck getting an interview United is a great place to work. |
Originally Posted by Kenny Powers
(Post 1973351)
Thanks for the info! Out and backs sound great if you live locally, no?
Instead of LAX - SEA - DEN - DSM - ORD - EWR...... How this affects the trip mix is yet to be seen. What is known is that you will be going back and forth between a single base all day then lay over at an outstation. The next day you may go to another base and then outback to that base and so on. Or you may just spend the entire trip going back and forth to LAX. That is why I said the trip mix might not be that good, due to the lack of destinations out of LAX. They are doing this to try and keep a snow storm in EWR from affecting the entire operation. The LAX crews should be isolated along with the planes flying out of LAX that day. We obviously need layovers for the late night arrivals/early morning departures at outstations. However, I feel that this new scheduling will greatly increase day trips and 2 day trips and cut 4+ days significantly. Well see...... |
Originally Posted by MasterOfPuppets
(Post 1973359)
well its not necessarily the crew that is being routed out and back (as in day trips) its the ships. They will go LAX - DEN - LAX -SEA - LAX.....
Instead of LAX - SEA - DEN - DSM - ORD - EWR...... How this affects the trip mix is yet to be seen. What is known is that you will be going back and forth between a single base all day then lay over at an outstation. The next day you may go to another base and then outback to that base and so on. Or you may just spend the entire trip going back and forth to LAX. That is why I said the trip mix might not be that good, due to the lack of destinations out of LAX. They are doing this to try and keep a snow storm in EWR from affecting the entire operation. The LAX crews should be isolated along with the planes flying out of LAX that day. We obviously need layovers for the late night arrivals/early morning departures at outstations. However, I feel that this new scheduling will greatly increase day trips and 2 day trips and cut 4+ days significantly. Well see...... Good info, thanks. |
Originally Posted by MasterOfPuppets
(Post 1973359)
well its not necessarily the crew that is being routed out and back (as in day trips) its the ships. They will go LAX - DEN - LAX -SEA - LAX.....
Instead of LAX - SEA - DEN - DSM - ORD - EWR...... How this affects the trip mix is yet to be seen. What is known is that you will be going back and forth between a single base all day then lay over at an outstation. The next day you may go to another base and then outback to that base and so on. Or you may just spend the entire trip going back and forth to LAX. That is why I said the trip mix might not be that good, due to the lack of destinations out of LAX. They are doing this to try and keep a snow storm in EWR from affecting the entire operation. The LAX crews should be isolated along with the planes flying out of LAX that day. We obviously need layovers for the late night arrivals/early morning departures at outstations. However, I feel that this new scheduling will greatly increase day trips and 2 day trips and cut 4+ days significantly. Well see...... |
Are they planning on getting rid of the 777's?
|
Originally Posted by Gilligan13
(Post 1975128)
Are they planning on getting rid of the 777's?
|
Originally Posted by cadetdrivr
(Post 1975138)
Only the ones that are not ETOPS.
well played |
Originally Posted by cadetdrivr
(Post 1975138)
Only the ones that are not ETOPS.
|
Originally Posted by Sniper66
(Post 1975235)
Can you tell us which 777 is not ETOPS on the UAL fleet?
Here's the list: End of list. (Sorry. This whole thing was an inside joke going back five years ---shortly after the merger--- when there was a rumor floating around certain gullible CAL employees that UAL's 777s were not ETOPS.) |
LA is going to have a sharp reduction in 777 flying next summer and an uptic in 787 flying. The 777s are being moved east.
|
To answer the OPs question, I am in the 15 Sep class, got 737 SFO during the class bid, put in my vacancy bid for LAX and was awarded it during the first week. And there were still unfilled vacancies at LAX, so you should have no trouble getting there.
|
How is the sleep room in LAX?
|
Originally Posted by 130drvr
(Post 1977913)
How is the sleep room in LAX?
|
But otherwise suitable for a pre-red eye nap or a pre-commute midnight nap?
|
Originally Posted by 130drvr
(Post 1978174)
But otherwise suitable for a pre-red eye nap or a pre-commute midnight nap?
|
From a QOL standpoint, given the choices of 73/Bus and LAX/SFO, which would be the best choice to hold a line asap?
For example, would one try for 73 LAX or Airbus SFO? I'd be commuting from SLC, LAX is a slightly easier commute. Hope my question makes sense! RV8 |
My guess would be SFO guppy. Big, getting bigger, growing fast.
|
Originally Posted by rv8builder
(Post 1981376)
From a QOL standpoint, given the choices of 73/Bus and LAX/SFO, which would be the best choice to hold a line asap?
For example, would one try for 73 LAX or Airbus SFO? I'd be commuting from SLC, LAX is a slightly easier commute. Hope my question makes sense! RV8 |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:39 AM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands