Airline Pilot Central Forums

Airline Pilot Central Forums (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/)
-   United (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/united/)
-   -   New 100 seater?? (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/united/91309-new-100-seater.html)

cadetdrivr 10-20-2015 04:28 PM


Originally Posted by SUX4U (Post 1996518)
There is a lot of noise from the RAH community thinking they will get a flow if we take their C Series orders off their hands. Is there any reason something like this couldn't come to fruition?

Nope. Anything can be negotiated if all parties agree.

But what's in it for us? (Seriously.)

It's not like we need permission to pick up cancelled orders nor were Republic pilots very receptive to "flow" when the current was moving the other direction.

Just saying.

(p.s. I would be receptive to granting slightly preferential interviews as long as the interviewers were 100% furloughed UA pilots who were graciously offered "new hire" opportunities at Republic.)

AxlF16 10-20-2015 04:29 PM


Originally Posted by SUX4U (Post 1996518)
There is a lot of noise from the RAH community thinking they will get a flow if we take their C Series orders off their hands. Is there any reason something like this couldn't come to fruition?

There's no reason for us to take their orders...and even if we did, why would the pilots of another company get anything in return? If it's an acquisition of existing aircraft it may be reasonable. What does their contract say about this subject?

Firsttimeflyer 10-20-2015 04:42 PM


Originally Posted by AxlF16 (Post 1996508)
The C300 isn't considered a NSNB because it's basically the same capacity as the A319 or 737-700. We need them to bring the 100-110 seat jet to mainline.

As far as pay rates go, we already have E190 and E195 rates so they can order those planes with no discussions. I can't imagine they would delay an order because of the lack of negotiated pay rates. CBA 3-J covers everything about new aircraft types.

I think you are missing the carrot they will be dangling. Its been in the media already.

"United Airlines plans to order a fleet of 100-seat jetliners from either Bombardier Inc. or Embraer SA if it can agree on terms for a two-year contract extension with pilots in expedited bargaining."

Just as Delta dangled that almost same carrot in front of their pilots for a TA. The 20 E190s and 40 737ERs most likely could have been added without TA ratification (I'm sure the 737, not sure E190 as I don't know their contract), but management dangled it in front of them. And your second to last sentence...delta did exactly that, they cancelled all 60 aircraft.

I will wait to judge any extension until actually reading it, but just because the company can do things now, doesn't mean they won't use what they could do as leverage or a bargaining tool. They could give us lots of things without amending a contract, but that hurts their negotiations. New airplanes on property is one of those bargaining chips, no matter how they get defined in the CBA.

cadetdrivr 10-20-2015 04:48 PM


Originally Posted by Firsttimeflyer (Post 1996529)
I think you are missing the carrot they will be dangling. Its been in the media already.

"United Airlines plans to order a fleet of 100-seat jetliners from either Bombardier Inc. or Embraer SA if it can agree on terms for a two-year contract extension with pilots in expedited bargaining."

I'm pretty sure this was the underlaying heartburn at the MEC on opening up limited negotiations.

Why chase a carrot that's not really a carrot?

Firsttimeflyer 10-20-2015 04:57 PM


Originally Posted by SUX4U (Post 1996518)
There is a lot of noise from the RAH community thinking they will get a flow if we take their C Series orders off their hands. Is there any reason something like this couldn't come to fruition?

It could, but I highly doubt it. Flows usually only get negotiated for wholly owned carriers. I honestly prefer to let everyone have an equal chance (may not seem that way to those wanting to get an interview), and give us (United Pilots/Company) the chance to pick from the entire pool, not just from a small portion.

Firsttimeflyer 10-20-2015 05:01 PM


Originally Posted by cadetdrivr (Post 1996534)
I'm pretty sure this was the underlaying heartburn at the MEC on opening up limited negotiations.

Why chase a carrot that's not really a carrot?

Yep, definitely understand that, now we just need to read carefully and think hard when the offer comes out (if it does).

ILOVELAMP 10-20-2015 05:05 PM

This looks like the plane Denzel flew in that movie. It didn't do so well lol.

John Carr 10-20-2015 06:11 PM


Originally Posted by flightmedic01 (Post 1996294)
Just hoping not to get those damn jungle jets! ��

Why does it matter? Just get the effing jets on mainline property flown by mainline pilots!!!!!!!

Ask ANY pilot that's hand his ass handed to him in this career (I fall in that category) what their favorite plane to fly is?

"The one I'm getting paid to fly......"


Originally Posted by Airway (Post 1996357)
Can't solve this equation with a couple of plugs like they're used to doing.

Wait, are you talking about Bombardier or Boeing? ;)

Yak02 10-20-2015 06:13 PM

Don't have any doubt, ALPA National will be negotiating any scope changes for us UAL pilots under their National Policy. We have no say in this what so every. This is not new.

Now is a good time to leave this Archaic, Worthless, Good for nothing Union. Are you ready to sign a card? Or keep wasting bullets on a Dead Horse.

Proximity 10-20-2015 10:31 PM


Originally Posted by SUX4U (Post 1996518)
There is a lot of noise from the RAH community thinking they will get a flow if we take their C Series orders off their hands. Is there any reason something like this couldn't come to fruition?

Why would United need to give anything up to get Republic's C Series positions? Bombardier is desperate to sell these airplanes, and delivery slots are likely not an issue for the right customer / order. United can just order directly from Bombardier.


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:01 PM.


Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands