Airline Pilot Central Forums

Airline Pilot Central Forums (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/)
-   United (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/united/)
-   -   Goodbye Dubai (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/united/92123-goodbye-dubai.html)

CousinEddie 12-09-2015 10:54 AM

Goodbye Dubai
 
Beginning of the end for the IAD hub?

http://finance.yahoo.com/news/united...180818693.html

FAAFlyer 12-09-2015 11:07 AM

Doubt it. Pretty scummy thing for JetBlue to do though.

C11DCA 12-09-2015 12:04 PM


Originally Posted by FAAFlyer (Post 2024573)
Doubt it. Pretty scummy thing for JetBlue to do though.

Sort of, not.

Ual and all the others use code shares for routes they never fly.

UAL was awarded IAD-ADD (codeshare with Ethiopian) for 2016.

Sucks for us in IAD but it is what it is.

DC

UalHvy 12-09-2015 12:09 PM


Originally Posted by CousinEddie (Post 2024560)
Beginning of the end for the IAD hub?

http://finance.yahoo.com/news/united...180818693.html

Wait...isn't our "awesome", "labor friendly" administration supposed to help ensure that competition is fair?

Umm hmmm.....

jsled 12-09-2015 12:22 PM


Originally Posted by UalHvy (Post 2024616)
Wait...isn't our "awesome", "labor friendly" administration supposed to help ensure that competition is fair?

Umm hmmm.....

FAR 117
Known Crewmember
New union election rules (and his Mar '15 VETO of the Republican bill to change them back)
Airline Pilot Pension Fairness Act

Yeah. This guy SUCKS!! :rolleyes:

CousinEddie 12-09-2015 12:26 PM


Originally Posted by C11DCA (Post 2024612)
Sort of, not.

Ual and all the others use code shares for routes they never fly.

UAL was awarded IAD-ADD (codeshare with Ethiopian) for 2016.

Sucks for us in IAD but it is what it is.

DC

The Government travel factor is a big part of what keeps the IAD hub alive. Otherwise, it is too close to EWR to make any sense for the merged UAL. If UAL continues to lose Government contracts, the viability of the IAD hub becomes questionable.

oldmako 12-09-2015 01:30 PM

I doubt that Dulles is in trouble. Being the nations capitol makes it make more recession proof than most areas due to Uncle Sam. Depending on your catchment area, its home to more than 6M affluent people. Aside from BWI and SWA (99% domestic travel) what other choice do peeps in DC/MD/VA have? For comparison, look at what's happening to Houston now that oil has fallen off a cliff.

UA recently renegotiated its lease with MWAA and managed to significantly reduce its operating costs there. We're a big enough airline to operate in both DC and NY. I can't imagine us taking DC pax to EWR for European and other international connections. We already screwed that up in MIA. If we were to pull out of Dulles, I'd bet money that either DAL or AA would slide right in. In my view, that alone is what will cement its viability.

From Wiki.. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Washin...ropolitan_area
"The Washington metropolitan area is the most educated and, by some measures, the most affluent metropolitan area in the United States [2] As of the 2014 U.S. Census Bureau estimate, the population of the Washington metropolitan area was estimated to be 6,033,737, making it the largest metropolitan area in the Census' Southeast region and the seventh-largest metropolitan area in the country.

And...

"Dulles has significant capacity for future growth. With minor expansion, the current facilities could accommodate 45 million annual passengers (22.5 million enplanements). With all future facilities in the master plan constructed, the airport could accommodate 70 million annual passengers (35 million enplanements) operating out of 250 airline gates. The current four-runway configuration has a capacity of up to 600,000 aircraft operations per year. With a future fifth runway constructed, the airfield capacity could increase to 1 million aircraft operations per year."

About Dulles International | Metropolitan Washington Airports Authority

UALinIAH 12-09-2015 01:39 PM


Originally Posted by CousinEddie (Post 2024632)
The Government travel factor is a big part of what keeps the IAD hub alive. Otherwise, it is too close to EWR to make any sense for the merged UAL. If UAL continues to lose Government contracts, the viability of the IAD hub becomes questionable.

We operated IAD and JFK for years. At one point JFK was our larget 75/76 base. I think both can coexist just fine.

CousinEddie 12-09-2015 01:48 PM


Originally Posted by oldmako (Post 2024666)
I doubt that Dulles is in trouble. Being the nations capitol makes it make more recession proof than most areas due to Uncle Sam. Depending on your catchment area, its home to more than 6M affluent people. Aside from BWI and SWA (99% domestic travel) what other choice do peeps in DC/MD/VA have? For comparison, look at what's happening to Houston now that oil has fallen off a cliff.

UA recently renegotiated its lease with MWAA and managed to significantly reduce its operating costs there. We're a big enough airline to operate in both DC and NY. I can't imagine us taking DC pax to EWR for European and other international connections. We already screwed that up in MIA. If we were to pull out of Dulles I'd bet money that either DAL or AA would slide right in. In my view, that alone is what will cement its viability.

From Wiki.. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Washin...ropolitan_area
"The Washington metropolitan area is the most educated and, by some measures, the most affluent metropolitan area in the United States [2] As of the 2014 U.S. Census Bureau estimate, the population of the Washington metropolitan area was estimated to be 6,033,737, making it the largest metropolitan area in the Census' Southeast region and the seventh-largest metropolitan area in the country.

And...

"Dulles has significant capacity for future growth. With minor expansion, the current facilities could accommodate 45 million annual passengers (22.5 million enplanements). With all future facilities in the master plan constructed, the airport could accommodate 70 million annual passengers (35 million enplanements) operating out of 250 airline gates. The current four-runway configuration has a capacity of up to 600,000 aircraft operations per year. With a future fifth runway constructed, the airfield capacity could increase to 1 million aircraft operations per year."

About Dulles International | Metropolitan Washington Airports Authority

Hopefully so James. The hub has to make money. I doubt we will run it at a continuous loss just in case. Pretty disturbing to see US taxpayer dollars go to a subsidized foreign competitor. How many more routes will meet a similar fate?

ANALYSIS: What does the future hold for United at Washington Dulles?

UalHvy 12-09-2015 02:25 PM


Originally Posted by jsled (Post 2024626)
FAR 117
Known Crewmember
New union election rules (and his Mar '15 VETO of the Republican bill to change them back)
Airline Pilot Pension Fairness Act

Yeah. This guy SUCKS!! :rolleyes:

None of that matters if we don't have jobs.


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:37 AM.


Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands