Sfo-sin
#11
Don't say Guppy
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 1,926
Likes: 0
From: Guppy driver
Just a swag, it should be manpower positive doing SFO SIN and dropping the tag. And it should be "crew positive" in that the trips are all much more efficient, and less fatiguing.
#12
Line Holder
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 819
Likes: 2
From: 756 left
I believe all current tag flying is non-augmented. The bunkies do a 3 day trip, the flying FO and CAP do a 6-8 day trip. The bunkie trips used to be senior as it was a short, high value trip.
Just a swag, it should be manpower positive doing SFO SIN and dropping the tag. And it should be "crew positive" in that the trips are all much more efficient, and less fatiguing.
Just a swag, it should be manpower positive doing SFO SIN and dropping the tag. And it should be "crew positive" in that the trips are all much more efficient, and less fatiguing.
#13
Don't say Guppy
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 1,926
Likes: 0
From: Guppy driver
AAAGGGGHHHH. I knew I would miss one. LHR to DEL was also augmented, but it has been gone for 16 years. NRT SIN is probably on the limit of what can be non-augmented. I did NRT BKK a couple of times. 7 hours, back side of the clock both ways. I was wacked for a week after that.
#14
Banned
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 172
Likes: 0
I believe all current tag flying is non-augmented. The bunkies do a 3 day trip, the flying FO and CAP do a 6-8 day trip. The bunkie trips used to be senior as it was a short, high value trip.
Just a swag, it should be manpower positive doing SFO SIN and dropping the tag. And it should be "crew positive" in that the trips are all much more efficient, and less fatiguing.
Just a swag, it should be manpower positive doing SFO SIN and dropping the tag. And it should be "crew positive" in that the trips are all much more efficient, and less fatiguing.
Pest
#16
Banned
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 1,629
Likes: 0
From: 756 Left Side
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post



