No Staller.

Nah lets all 'feel sorry' for 734 dumb@rses and drag out insults that were first hurled four years ago instead. Truly a milestone!

But it's 734 pilots that feels that or had the stones to identify with that group. What does that represent 20% of the pre-merger CAL pilots?

No Staller?

Do you feel the CAL side was provided with effective, honest representation during the SLI?

Agreed. Everyone knew prior to the UAL/CAL SLI that there would be a lawsuit afterwards. We know there will be one after AMR / US also. Why get spun up about it? I look at it as a plus in the long run. What are these misguided types supposed to say in the future when both the arbitrators and the courts didn't agree with them? Case closed. To those CAL pilots hired around the time I was and beyond that are now senior to me, have a nice career at UAL. I'll still look forward to hanging out with them on the layover.

Absolutely not. Their leadership during the SLI was their problem. They might have done slightly better with better representation.

It would be like Staller representing l-UAL pilots during the SLI. We'd have been stapled for sure.

ALPA is so powerful that they even convinced APA and USAPA to follow the same ISL method in the American ISL case as part of the cover up.

My lord, those of you flushing money down the drain why not spend some time doing research on what was done at DL/NW, 9E/XJ/9L and now AA/US. Why not also spend that money on either APAC, UPAC or the families of our deceased pilots.

No, I think Staller would have made a special case for YOU and had YOU stapled to the bottom of the list for selling out all United pilots some time ago. No need for me to explain to others but you know what I'm referring to. Why not come clean to your internet friends.

Better question, why do you ask given that you dug up this thread because "you feel sorry" for 734 CAL dumbarses? But yeah you sure have moved on. Meantime, let's both enjoy watching that compounding extension cash pile up baby!