Search

Notices

Schnaubelt FAA letter

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-08-2016 | 05:05 AM
  #1  
APC225's Avatar
Thread Starter
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 3,866
Likes: 0
Default Schnaubelt FAA letter

"117.5 does not quantify the amount of fatigue"

"the FAA declines to categorically find that a slight amount of fatigue"

"whether to conduct an emergency landing will depend on the flightcrew member's fatigue level"

"nearest suitable location to avoid accumulating additional amounts of fatigue"

http://www.faa.gov/about/office_org/...rpretation.pdf
Reply
Old 04-08-2016 | 05:19 AM
  #2  
cadetdrivr's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 2,639
Likes: 0
Default

Hack the clock.

It's only a matter of time until a flight is diverted en route due to inadequate crew "rest" facilities (noise, temp, bedding, or whatever).

It almost certinally should have already happened, IMHO, but now the FAA has issued a get-out-of-jail-free interpretation.
Reply
Old 04-08-2016 | 06:03 AM
  #3  
APC225's Avatar
Thread Starter
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 3,866
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by APC225
"117.5 does not quantify the amount of fatigue"

"the FAA declines to categorically find that a slight amount of fatigue"

"whether to conduct an emergency landing will depend on the flightcrew member's fatigue level"

"nearest suitable location to avoid accumulating additional amounts of fatigue"

http://www.faa.gov/about/office_org/...rpretation.pdf
I was a little surprised at the words "levels" and "amounts" with respect to fatigue. I thought it was "yes" or "no" to being fatigued, not "a little" or "a lot." They reiterate twice in this letter that fatigue cannot cause you to fall below performing "duties at the highest degree of safety."

Since "highest" is an absolute term, and to fall below that is illegal, then any fatigue at all--low "level" or small "amount"--would drop the pilot down to less than "highest." Using an absolute term for the standard of safety but a relative term for fatigue seems contradictory.
Reply
Old 04-08-2016 | 07:56 AM
  #4  
oldmako's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 3,076
Likes: 3
From: The GF of FUPM
Default

From the pilot's perspective, there is a significant difference between the legacies F/A "procedures" as they apply to a pilot getting rest in the 777 bunk. And it's not a good difference. I know that Garry made some progress, but I haven't flown enough split trips yet to see if it's taking hold. And I haven't seen anything in print from Howard. But, I did go to LEAP training and did have several uSource submittals denied.

Perhaps they saw my AFA pin?? Maybe I'll skip my next break and go play the Saxophone next to their bunks instead.
Reply
Old 04-08-2016 | 04:42 PM
  #5  
Pilot Response
 
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 485
Likes: 0
From: A320 Captain
Default

Originally Posted by oldmako
From the pilot's perspective, there is a significant difference between the legacies F/A "procedures" as they apply to a pilot getting rest in the 777 bunk. And it's not a good difference. I know that Garry made some progress, but I haven't flown enough split trips yet to see if it's taking hold. And I haven't seen anything in print from Howard. But, I did go to LEAP training and did have several uSource submittals denied.

Perhaps they saw my AFA pin?? Maybe I'll skip my next break and go play the Saxophone next to their bunks instead.
Don't forget the phone, the jumpseat snap-up, in & out of the closet and setting up the entire galley by 1L; a mere 4 feet from your wide-awake head. All of the above without the slightest awareness or concern that there is a person in the bunk. Amazing.
Reply
Old 04-08-2016 | 05:35 PM
  #6  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 440
Likes: 14
From: 30 West
Default

Originally Posted by cadetdrivr
Hack the clock.

It's only a matter of time until a flight is diverted en route due to inadequate crew "rest" facilities (noise, temp, bedding, or whatever).

It almost certinally should have already happened, IMHO, but now the FAA has issued a get-out-of-jail-free interpretation.
Too late....already happened 17 years ago. Who knows if being in the middle of contract negotiations made the crew tired enough to push them over the limit.

Tired Delta Crew Diverts Flight, Blames Cramped New Berths - WSJ
Reply
Old 04-08-2016 | 07:42 PM
  #7  
oldmako's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 3,076
Likes: 3
From: The GF of FUPM
Default

Originally Posted by NFLUALNFL
Don't forget the phone, the jumpseat snap-up, in & out of the closet and setting up the entire galley by 1L; a mere 4 feet from your wide-awake head. All of the above without the slightest awareness or concern that there is a person in the bunk. Amazing.
That my friend is a tad inaccurate. They are well aware. They simply have no concern. I learned that first hand in BRU a few weeks ago on a split trip. We ended up spending some time with them during extended debrief. Not one of us brought the topic up, yet it was openly derided during their protracted rant regarding miscellaneous procedural changes, legacy cultural aspects and the AFA. It was an eye opener and possibly the last time it will ever occur.

Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
FEtrip7
Cargo
41
02-16-2012 02:25 PM
ewrbasedpilot
Major
1
12-10-2010 06:44 AM
Donkey
Hangar Talk
1
03-29-2009 11:42 AM
EWRflyr
Major
2
01-09-2009 03:12 PM
Freightbird
Cargo
9
04-26-2007 04:31 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices