WiFi for bunkies?
#1
Thread Starter
On Reserve
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 156
Likes: 0
I assume the answer is 'fat chance, idiot' but does UAL provide free WiFi (not the entertainment WiFi - actual 'surf the web WiFi') for a working crew member on break/bunkie? Googling here came up empty.
#3
Line Holder
Joined: Sep 2013
Posts: 1,069
Likes: 25
I take pride in submitting my expense for the wifi by using the wifi!! They have gotten so fast at approving the expense reports that I frequently have the expense approval email by the time I get to the hotel.
#5
Banned
Joined: Sep 2016
Posts: 375
Likes: 0
High speed video of United Wifi installation:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OsuvlmDWYuA
Why is airplane WiFi so expensive?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R2hkQ03iCiY
#6
Line Holder
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 317
Likes: 1
From: CAP A320
My question is wifi actually works now on domestic flights? Over 50% of my 757 flights, the Wifi is inop. Totally outrageous and especially on Sundays, the pax are very vocal with their displeasure of not getting NFL scores. UAL - "IT company with Wings" has to be the biggest joke ever.
#7
There are two or three wifi systems in our jets. Still trying to get a definitive answer.
The Panasonic system is the most prevalent. In 2014, it seemed to work pretty reliably in the 757RR and 764 fleets.
As it was added to the 767-300, it worked some of the time, over the CONUS.
Now?
It rarely works. The signal is there, but you can't even get the free United site. I haven't tried paying for it, but others too have said it is reimbursable.
The 757-PS jets have Gogo. I have never seen it NOT work. It is fantastic. Unfortunately, it is only 14 planes, I think.
As a passenger, the on-board wifi on the Airbus is great.
As a pax on the 737, with direct TV? Every little turn (even 5 degrees of bank, or turbulence), the antenna loses the satellite. So irritating, it's not enjoyable to watch anything.
It appears to me the Panasonic system is part satellite/part ground-based radio link (like a cell phone). If it works, it works best over the CONUS.
Gogo seems to be ground-based only.
I believe United and one or two other major carriers are suing Panasonic over the poor performance of this system.
I wish we would go Gogo for all.
The Panasonic system is the most prevalent. In 2014, it seemed to work pretty reliably in the 757RR and 764 fleets.
As it was added to the 767-300, it worked some of the time, over the CONUS.
Now?
It rarely works. The signal is there, but you can't even get the free United site. I haven't tried paying for it, but others too have said it is reimbursable.
The 757-PS jets have Gogo. I have never seen it NOT work. It is fantastic. Unfortunately, it is only 14 planes, I think.
As a passenger, the on-board wifi on the Airbus is great.
As a pax on the 737, with direct TV? Every little turn (even 5 degrees of bank, or turbulence), the antenna loses the satellite. So irritating, it's not enjoyable to watch anything.
It appears to me the Panasonic system is part satellite/part ground-based radio link (like a cell phone). If it works, it works best over the CONUS.
Gogo seems to be ground-based only.
I believe United and one or two other major carriers are suing Panasonic over the poor performance of this system.
I wish we would go Gogo for all.
#8
You can use it and expense it. Approved on your rest breaks.
Good luck with it. The IT company with wings...
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post



