Airline Pilot Central Forums

Airline Pilot Central Forums (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/)
-   United (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/united/)
-   -   Delta Snap Up (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/united/98242-delta-snap-up.html)

flap 12-25-2016 09:28 AM


Originally Posted by Ottolillienthal (Post 2269279)
Are you sure this is correct? The excess funds already collected were largely (if not all) collected under a previous contract and a previous (now nonexistent) airline. I do think if ALPA negotiated a deal with the company, and the company has collected excess funds, ALPA has a fiduciary obligation to represent those pilots to insure their funds that are misappropriated are repatriated. I would like to be remunerated for my share of the overpayments. I don't care about any future possibilities of age changes. That seems to be the company's argument for keeping my money.


Hate to burst your bubble, but not a penny of the money in the trust is yours. It all belongs to the CAL pilots on LTD until the last guy leaves the plan.

Contractual language opens the POSSIBILITY of a quicker distribution but language allows the company to say when it is administratively feasible.

This will get the excess to CAL pilots quicker, but it should not be done at the expense of the pilots that are disabled.

Sluffing off the liability to an insurance company might add a level of risk to benefits that would result in litigation and other potential administrative and contractual responsibilities.

It's not as easy as some suggest.

JoePatroni 12-25-2016 10:45 AM


Originally Posted by Ottolillienthal (Post 2269279)
Are you sure this is correct? The excess funds already collected were largely (if not all) collected under a previous contract and a previous (now nonexistent) airline. I do think if ALPA negotiated a deal with the company, and the company has collected excess funds, ALPA has a fiduciary obligation to represent those pilots to insure their funds that are misappropriated are repatriated. I would like to be remunerated for my share of the overpayments. I don't care about any future possibilities of age changes. That seems to be the company's argument for keeping my money.

It's all in the language, the company has already done what the agreement says they have to do. They considered it and said not at this time. It's not just a simple act of cutting checks, the process has to involve outside parties and the company decides whether or not to move forward. It sucks but it's also why we are where we are.

Ottolillienthal 12-26-2016 09:02 AM


Originally Posted by JoePatroni (Post 2269395)
the process has to involve outside parties and the company decides whether or not to move forward. It .

I gotcha. Does anyone supervise the company on this? Another words, does the language preclude the association from getting involved to insure the pilots rights are being protected? For some reason, I am just not trusting of the company and feel better when my union is keeping an eye on the money.

Ottolillienthal 12-26-2016 09:12 AM


Originally Posted by flap (Post 2269354)
Hate to burst your bubble, but not a penny of the money in the trust is yours. It all belongs to the CAL pilots on LTD until the last guy leaves the plan.

Contractual language opens the POSSIBILITY of a quicker distribution but language allows the company to say when it is administratively feasible.

This will get the excess to CAL pilots quicker, but it should not be done at the expense of the pilots that are disabled.

Sluffing off the liability to an insurance company might add a level of risk to benefits that would result in litigation and other potential administrative and contractual responsibilities.

It's not as easy as some suggest.

That seems reasonable to me. I just don't want the company holding the money longer than necessary, and/or for the purposes of providing additional self-insurance should any further age changes occur. An age increase, or further law changes in my opinion should trigger new negotiations and any over-payments or over-funded plans should not be used in those calculations.

Shrek 12-26-2016 09:39 AM

Holy thread drift.......

Any updates on the snap up?

jsled 12-26-2016 09:48 AM


Originally Posted by Shrek (Post 2269732)
Holy thread drift.......

Any updates on the snap up?

well sir...the company says in addition to the 3% Jan 17, we get 4.42% effective Feb 17, 3% Jan 18 (vs 2%), and 4% Jan 19. Anything else is pie in the sky.

757Driver 12-26-2016 10:09 AM


Originally Posted by jsled (Post 2269735)
well sir...the company says in addition to the 3% Jan 17, we get 4.42% effective Feb 17, 3% Jan 18 (vs 2%), and 4% Jan 19. Anything else is pie in the sky.

Not according to the Negotiating Committee. As the company was salivating over Delta's profit sharing changes dragging those figures down, the same can be said for the increase they're to receive which in turn should lift our rates even higher.

I complete support their efforts and hope they are successful with the arbitrator.

JoePatroni 12-26-2016 10:35 AM


Originally Posted by Ottolillienthal (Post 2269720)
I gotcha. Does anyone supervise the company on this? Another words, does the language preclude the association from getting involved to insure the pilots rights are being protected? For some reason, I am just not trusting of the company and feel better when my union is keeping an eye on the money.

Everything remains status quo until the company decides otherwise. The union can continually request to have the plan sold but the company can continually denY the request until such time as they see fit to assume the liability and move forward.

jsled 12-26-2016 10:55 AM


Originally Posted by 757Driver (Post 2269742)
Not according to the Negotiating Committee. As the company was salivating over Delta's profit sharing changes dragging those figures down, the same can be said for the increase they're to receive which in turn should lift our rates even higher.

I complete support their efforts and hope they are successful with the arbitrator.

Their increase? Tell me about their increase in profit sharing. Hey, I support our NC's efforts as well...get all you can get while you can get it!! That's my motto. But i'm a little skeptical after reading the arguments. Time will tell. I do know that come Feb, my hourly rate will be 21.2% higher than the Jan 17 rates on the UPA. Man...the Extension was a SLAM DUNK.

flap 12-26-2016 02:14 PM


Originally Posted by Ottolillienthal (Post 2269723)
That seems reasonable to me. I just don't want the company holding the money longer than necessary, and/or for the purposes of providing additional self-insurance should any further age changes occur. An age increase, or further law changes in my opinion should trigger new negotiations and any over-payments or over-funded plans should not be used in those calculations.

Problem is that some pilots were contractually covered to normal retirement age as opposed to a set number


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:45 AM.


Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands