AMZN Threat to FDX Is No Longer ‘Fantastical’
#11
Occasional box hauler
Joined APC: Jan 2018
Posts: 1,683
My anecdotal experience is that we are rarely flying lightly loaded jets. On the MD domestically, the payloads are very healthy. I’ve only flown one empty jet this year. Fred is a business genius, but he may have grown FEDEX Express too aggressively. He wouldn’t be the first genius to make a mistake. It doesn’t mean they are sunk, just that they may experience a few lean years while they sort it out. UPS definitely prefers not to make capital expenditures until it absolutely has to. We miss opportunities for growth as a result, but it tends to make us a more consistently profitable and boring company.
#12
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
Joined APC: Feb 2013
Posts: 1,339
Good comments all..
I disagree. They’ve got issues for sure, just like we do, but I think this decision will only strengthen them as a company.
I agree.
Very true.
However, this thread is really about FedEx’s latest Amazon decision. (offloading Amazon’s business).
So to go back to my original question - will/should we follow fdx in shedding Amazon’s airside business? I realize no one listens to pilots (and they probably shouldn’t lol) BUT I’m curious why we haven’t already done what fdx just announced?
Several managers have told us we make very little money on amazon shipments.. if so, why are we helping them in growing their own business?
An honest question.
However, this thread is really about FedEx’s latest Amazon decision. (offloading Amazon’s business).
So to go back to my original question - will/should we follow fdx in shedding Amazon’s airside business? I realize no one listens to pilots (and they probably shouldn’t lol) BUT I’m curious why we haven’t already done what fdx just announced?
Several managers have told us we make very little money on amazon shipments.. if so, why are we helping them in growing their own business?
An honest question.
#13
We waded much more deeply into the AMZN pool than FedEx. It would be roughly 10% revenue hit and over 20% if the volume, Ive heard that number is much higher at World port. Should we walk away today, I think the answer is yes. Force AMZN to pay higher rates on a guaranteed volume number for xxx number of years, or tell them to Have a nice day. They are going to pull the rug out from under us sooner or later, I hope we are prepping for that
#14
We are in deep trouble, why the hell are we hiring 60 pilots a month and buying so many freaking new airplanes??? I don't get it, maybe one of you enlightened cargo geniuses should be talking to Fred....
#15
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Mar 2014
Posts: 176
How profitable is the mail hauling at FDX?
UPS is capable of delivering most of the AMZ air on the ground. FDX can’t unless AMZ ships vis FDX Ground.
FDX Express is the only union shop in FDX. Regulations for FDX to ship Express on a plane. It cannot go ground. FDX Ground is all contractors. How many of them, especially the tractor trailer drivers will jump to AMZ? There is a trucking shortage so AMZ and FDX will have to figure out how much they are willing to pay. UPS full time feeder drivers make 6 figures and don’t have to pay for their truck or gas. They can haul Air. UPS’ network is more efficient and profitable.
As far as FDX hiring as another posted? So is UPS and a number of pilots retiring.
I look for major changes as FDX in coming years. Either they drop the contractor model on ground and integrate it with Express. Reducing the need for aircraft and capable of hauling Express in Ground Network like UPS or eventually turning to an AMZ model where the Express is subcontracted out to reduce labor costs like they do on ground. I’m thinking Ground contracting goes away and Express network shrinks.
UPS is capable of delivering most of the AMZ air on the ground. FDX can’t unless AMZ ships vis FDX Ground.
FDX Express is the only union shop in FDX. Regulations for FDX to ship Express on a plane. It cannot go ground. FDX Ground is all contractors. How many of them, especially the tractor trailer drivers will jump to AMZ? There is a trucking shortage so AMZ and FDX will have to figure out how much they are willing to pay. UPS full time feeder drivers make 6 figures and don’t have to pay for their truck or gas. They can haul Air. UPS’ network is more efficient and profitable.
As far as FDX hiring as another posted? So is UPS and a number of pilots retiring.
I look for major changes as FDX in coming years. Either they drop the contractor model on ground and integrate it with Express. Reducing the need for aircraft and capable of hauling Express in Ground Network like UPS or eventually turning to an AMZ model where the Express is subcontracted out to reduce labor costs like they do on ground. I’m thinking Ground contracting goes away and Express network shrinks.
#16
Banned
Joined APC: Sep 2015
Position: MD-11 FO
Posts: 493
#17
Occasional box hauler
Joined APC: Jan 2018
Posts: 1,683
#18
Yep, yet another amazon thread..
I’m posting this in ups forum because fdx has already made the switch. Curious to hear y'alls take on this - should/will ups follow fdx in shedding Amazon’s airside business?
I’m posting this in ups forum because fdx has already made the switch. Curious to hear y'alls take on this - should/will ups follow fdx in shedding Amazon’s airside business?
And, FedEx only ended the N. American delivery of Amazon stuff. They are still doing worldwide Amazon delivery, which seems strange...
#19
#20
Occasional box hauler
Joined APC: Jan 2018
Posts: 1,683
I agree their sky isn’t falling. However, UPS also has significant pension costs and didn’t turn in a loss. Their pension obligations are a built in cost of doing business. If they can’t turn a profit right now, when the economy is relatively booming, how will they do when the economy crumps during the next recession?
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post