Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Cargo > UPS
AMZN Threat to FDX Is No Longer ‘Fantastical’ >

AMZN Threat to FDX Is No Longer ‘Fantastical’

Search
Notices

AMZN Threat to FDX Is No Longer ‘Fantastical’

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-25-2019, 04:02 AM
  #11  
Occasional box hauler
 
Joined APC: Jan 2018
Posts: 1,683
Default

My anecdotal experience is that we are rarely flying lightly loaded jets. On the MD domestically, the payloads are very healthy. I’ve only flown one empty jet this year. Fred is a business genius, but he may have grown FEDEX Express too aggressively. He wouldn’t be the first genius to make a mistake. It doesn’t mean they are sunk, just that they may experience a few lean years while they sort it out. UPS definitely prefers not to make capital expenditures until it absolutely has to. We miss opportunities for growth as a result, but it tends to make us a more consistently profitable and boring company.
tnkrdrvr is offline  
Old 06-25-2019, 04:39 AM
  #12  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Feb 2013
Posts: 1,339
Default

Good comments all..

Originally Posted by G550Guy View Post
...
FedEx is in trouble... and Fred/Wall Street know it. They’ve been leveraged for years and their own investors have said quit spending money for over a year now...
I disagree. They’ve got issues for sure, just like we do, but I think this decision will only strengthen them as a company.


Originally Posted by BoilerUP View Post
FDX will be fine.

They’ve been the sector’s darling on Wall Street due to their (comparatively) rapid revenue growth, and any threat to continued revenue growth at previous pace gets their share price punished by investors...
I agree.

Originally Posted by tnkrdrvr View Post
...UPS definitely prefers not to make capital expenditures until it absolutely has to. We miss opportunities for growth as a result, but it tends to make us a more consistently profitable and boring company.
Very true.

However, this thread is really about FedEx’s latest Amazon decision. (offloading Amazon’s business).

So to go back to my original question - will/should we follow fdx in shedding Amazon’s airside business? I realize no one listens to pilots (and they probably shouldn’t lol) BUT I’m curious why we haven’t already done what fdx just announced?
Several managers have told us we make very little money on amazon shipments.. if so, why are we helping them in growing their own business?
An honest question.


Originally Posted by G550Guy View Post
...
I do wonder what color you get when you mix Pullman Brown/Yellow & Purple/Orange...
whalesurfer is offline  
Old 06-25-2019, 05:06 AM
  #13  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Rocket Bob's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2006
Position: B-747-400 FO
Posts: 354
Default

We waded much more deeply into the AMZN pool than FedEx. It would be roughly 10% revenue hit and over 20% if the volume, Ive heard that number is much higher at World port. Should we walk away today, I think the answer is yes. Force AMZN to pay higher rates on a guaranteed volume number for xxx number of years, or tell them to Have a nice day. They are going to pull the rug out from under us sooner or later, I hope we are prepping for that
Rocket Bob is offline  
Old 06-25-2019, 06:00 AM
  #14  
Gets Weekends Off
 
fly2ski's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2006
Position: MD-11
Posts: 281
Default

We are in deep trouble, why the hell are we hiring 60 pilots a month and buying so many freaking new airplanes??? I don't get it, maybe one of you enlightened cargo geniuses should be talking to Fred....
fly2ski is offline  
Old 06-28-2019, 05:27 PM
  #15  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2014
Posts: 176
Default

How profitable is the mail hauling at FDX?

UPS is capable of delivering most of the AMZ air on the ground. FDX can’t unless AMZ ships vis FDX Ground.

FDX Express is the only union shop in FDX. Regulations for FDX to ship Express on a plane. It cannot go ground. FDX Ground is all contractors. How many of them, especially the tractor trailer drivers will jump to AMZ? There is a trucking shortage so AMZ and FDX will have to figure out how much they are willing to pay. UPS full time feeder drivers make 6 figures and don’t have to pay for their truck or gas. They can haul Air. UPS’ network is more efficient and profitable.

As far as FDX hiring as another posted? So is UPS and a number of pilots retiring.

I look for major changes as FDX in coming years. Either they drop the contractor model on ground and integrate it with Express. Reducing the need for aircraft and capable of hauling Express in Ground Network like UPS or eventually turning to an AMZ model where the Express is subcontracted out to reduce labor costs like they do on ground. I’m thinking Ground contracting goes away and Express network shrinks.
Tango Uniform is offline  
Old 06-28-2019, 06:22 PM
  #16  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Sep 2015
Position: MD-11 FO
Posts: 493
Default

https://www.usnews.com/news/business...in-coming-year


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
G550Guy is offline  
Old 06-28-2019, 07:36 PM
  #17  
Occasional box hauler
 
Joined APC: Jan 2018
Posts: 1,683
Default

Originally Posted by G550Guy View Post
Yikes! Going from an almost $2 billion dollar profit 4th quarter 2018 to an over $1 billion dollar loss 4th quarter 2019. Hope Fred figures things out quick. On the plus side, this might delay UPS deciding to copy 7 day a week deliveries. I’m not looking forward to what that may do to the bidpack.
tnkrdrvr is offline  
Old 06-28-2019, 09:31 PM
  #18  
Gets Weekends Off
 
atpcliff's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2007
Position: Capt
Posts: 3,215
Default

Yep, yet another amazon thread..

I’m posting this in ups forum because fdx has already made the switch. Curious to hear y'alls take on this - should/will ups follow fdx in shedding Amazon’s airside business?
I would not be surprised if Amazon and UPS work together in some form...

And, FedEx only ended the N. American delivery of Amazon stuff. They are still doing worldwide Amazon delivery, which seems strange...
atpcliff is offline  
Old 06-29-2019, 03:06 AM
  #19  
The NeverEnding Story
 
BoilerUP's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2005
Posts: 7,512
Default

Originally Posted by tnkrdrvr View Post
Yikes! Going from an almost $2 billion dollar profit 4th quarter 2018 to an over $1 billion dollar loss 4th quarter 2019.
That was due to a non-cash, $3.9B pension mark-to-market adjustment.

Operating profit was north of $1.3B.

Their sky isn’t falling...
BoilerUP is offline  
Old 06-29-2019, 03:16 AM
  #20  
Occasional box hauler
 
Joined APC: Jan 2018
Posts: 1,683
Default

Originally Posted by BoilerUP View Post
That was due to a non-cash, $3.9B pension mark-to-market adjustment.

Operating profit was north of $1.3B.

Their sky isn’t falling...
I agree their sky isn’t falling. However, UPS also has significant pension costs and didn’t turn in a loss. Their pension obligations are a built in cost of doing business. If they can’t turn a profit right now, when the economy is relatively booming, how will they do when the economy crumps during the next recession?
tnkrdrvr is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Zoro
Cargo
32
07-26-2012 06:32 AM
steamgauge
Cargo
200
12-18-2008 06:25 PM
Laxrox43
Cargo
77
06-05-2008 08:28 AM
CloudSailor
Cargo
18
05-19-2008 10:34 AM
Adlerdriver
Cargo
39
03-11-2008 07:09 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices