Dec new hire class
Who’s up next?
|
CJO for the 5 Dec class
|
6 Dec class for me.
|
Congrats! We look forward to seeing your bright shiny faces in indoc.
|
Congrats and welcome!
|
Is there a December class group chat going yet?
|
Originally Posted by ncaa2011
(Post 3539731)
Is there a December class group chat going yet?
|
https://signal.group/#CjQKIJeKwfloetC8YJwczQpgCyIWOULiS4sav7Dn2-B6KlDfEhBssWdMqpw8OpQ3PApMfBKr
|
Any word on class size today?
|
Bump for the drop?
|
7 a300, 3 anc 747, 1 sdf 747
|
Originally Posted by Busman
(Post 3545799)
7 a300, 3 anc 747, 1 sdf 747
Interesting that there was a sdf 747 left over for new hire |
No 75/76 (with new a/c to start showing up next year) nor MD’s? Displacement bid incoming?
|
Originally Posted by Slim_Pickens
(Post 3545948)
No 75/76 (with new a/c to start showing up next year) nor MD’s? Displacement bid incoming?
|
Originally Posted by Slim_Pickens
(Post 3545948)
No 75/76 (with new a/c to start showing up next year) nor MD’s? Displacement bid incoming?
|
Originally Posted by Slim_Pickens
(Post 3545948)
No 75/76 (with new a/c to start showing up next year) nor MD’s?
|
Originally Posted by BoilerUP
(Post 3546166)
The December class was filled with positions remaining from 22-101.
Do you have the number created in the vacancy that just closed? thanks |
Originally Posted by Night_Hawk
(Post 3546530)
Are those the last remaining vacancies from 22-101?
Do you have the number created in the vacancy that just closed? thanks |
I’m sure there wasn’t a 747 SDF. That position has gone quite senior.
|
Manager? Maybe
|
No it looks like a real person got the sdf 747 not a manager.
|
Originally Posted by airplanes
(Post 3547730)
No it looks like a real person got the sdf 747 not a manager.
|
Originally Posted by jetlaggy
(Post 3547752)
2 of em. Wow
|
Originally Posted by BoilerUP
(Post 3547772)
I think that was an error in CPIL; it said 12 newhires and 1 FQL but there were only eleven newhires pictured.
|
Originally Posted by jetlaggy
(Post 3547790)
Where are you saying the error is? I saw two IPA 747 SDF
I don't believe there were twelve total, and I don't think there were two SDF 747. |
One union guy is pictured twice in the Chief Pilots Propaganda Line, if that is a clue.
|
Originally Posted by Slim_Pickens
(Post 3545948)
No 75/76 (with new a/c to start showing up next year) nor MD’s? Displacement bid incoming?
|
Originally Posted by CardboardCutout
(Post 3547801)
One union guy is pictured twice in the Chief Pilots Propaganda Line, if that is a clue.
I know my eyes are getting old and half of ever class looks like brothers...but I can’t find the Waldo you speak of. I did compare union records and found the 747 SDF error tho |
Can someone explain how a new hire gets 747 SDF when so many others have standing bids for SDF?
|
Originally Posted by J Van Vliet
(Post 3548830)
Can someone explain how a new hire gets 747 SDF when so many others have standing bids for SDF?
New Hires are awarded vacancies based on unfilled vacancies, in this case from a previous bid. That’s how a new hire got SDF when more senior pilots want it. Clear as mud…? |
Originally Posted by FTv3
(Post 3549006)
The recent vacancy bid only had openings for 76 so any SDF 74 FO openings would have had to come from SDF 74 FOs bidding off fleet. Those resulting (recurred) openings would have then been available in this bid. 4 became available and were awarded.
New Hires are awarded vacancies based on unfilled vacancies, in this case from a previous bid. That’s how a new hire got SDF when more senior pilots want it. Clear as mud…? |
Originally Posted by tnkrdrvr
(Post 3549404)
Which is still pretty crappy.
|
I’d prefer more along the lines of United. The idea of a desirable seat going to a new hire when plenty of folks already in property aren’t allowed to grab it is wrong.
|
Isn't the idea here that the seat went unfilledso thats why a new hire got it. We had first crack at it.
|
Originally Posted by jetlaggy
(Post 3549834)
Isn't the idea here that the seat went unfilledso thats why a new hire got it. We had first crack at it.
Tnkr - I agree that all open vacancies at point in time of the 22-102 Bid should have been included in the bid but also realize it’s not always that simple. Effective dates, training constraints, long term planning changes all affect the company’s ability to offer them. That and they just don’t give a F. |
Like a OT trip tickiing inside 48 hrs. U had your chance now they are in control. I just find it strange that a 747 SDF went unfilled in any bid.
|
Originally Posted by jetlaggy
(Post 3549834)
Isn't the idea here that the seat went unfilledso thats why a new hire got it. We had first crack at it.
|
Originally Posted by tnkrdrvr
(Post 3550089)
ANC 74 new hires who came on board after that bid, but before the most recent bid did not have a shot at that slot and are senior (perhaps by hundreds of numbers) to the guys who are getting it. My opinion is that anytime we have a system bid, every open slot from that and all previous bids should be fair game. If the company no longer wants the slot, they should be forced to delete it. Obviously, this would take a change in contractual language. We don’t get things here out of the goodness of the company’s heart.
I am sure the company would love the opportunity to delete slots at their whim..right now we force them to use them within 18 months I believe..thats for a reason. |
I was awarded Z in my new hire class at the same time the company was displacing people off it.
|
Originally Posted by CCCXCI
(Post 3550197)
I was awarded Z in my new hire class at the same time the company was displacing people off it.
Sounds bout right…smh |
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:53 AM. |
User Alert System provided by
Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) -
vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2024 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Website Copyright ©2000 - 2017 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands