Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Cargo > UPS
MD 11 RTO/off rwy in ICN >

MD 11 RTO/off rwy in ICN

Search
Notices

MD 11 RTO/off rwy in ICN

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-24-2016, 01:45 PM
  #81  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2006
Position: Retired
Posts: 3,717
Default

Originally Posted by Freight Dog View Post
I'm not a lawyer but... good cause exists to go after his identity. He's identified himself in a post years ago as a management pilot, and in the midst of an NTSB investigation he's voicing his opinion on what happened in Seoul and criticizing the IPA pilot group all along the way.

And imagine the leverage we would have. We could post his rantings in every issue of the IPA Flight Times for a full year... just one idea.
The guy's a jerk, for sure, but whatever happened to the First Amendment? I don't think misidentifying ones self or voicing an opinion of a particular situation, or for that matter, criticizing ones pilot group, would be grounds for what you've advocated. Besides, if there's no lawsuit, there is no case or controversy, therefore a subpoena would not be proper.
Jetjok is offline  
Old 06-24-2016, 02:12 PM
  #82  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2014
Position: Retired from APC.
Posts: 507
Default

Originally Posted by Jetjok View Post
The guy's a jerk, for sure, but whatever happened to the First Amendment? I don't think misidentifying ones self or voicing an opinion of a particular situation, or for that matter, criticizing ones pilot group, would be grounds for what you've advocated. Besides, if there's no lawsuit, there is no case or controversy, therefore a subpoena would not be proper.
What about for the pain and suffering he is inflicting by being such a hand job?
FTFF is offline  
Old 06-24-2016, 02:43 PM
  #83  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Avroman's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Position: FIRE ALPA
Posts: 3,082
Default

Originally Posted by Swedish Blender View Post
>At approximately 9:30 a.m. EDT on June 6, 2016, UPS Flight 61 experienced a rejected takeoff at Incheon International Airport in South Korea. The MD-11 aircraft stopped partially off the runway, and the four crewmembers onboard were able to evacuate the aircraft safely.

The cargo aircraft, N277UP, was bound for Anchorage, Alaska.

UPS places the highest emphasis on safety, and wish to thank the Incheon Airport authorities for their immediate assistance with this event. As a technical advisor to the U.S. National Transportation Safety Board, UPS will also be assisting the South Korean aviation and investigation officials with any accident investigation convened in South Korea.<

Anybody see or hear anything? I'm sure no one will learn anything productive from the company from past practice.
Originally Posted by CactusCrew View Post
Not from the company, but there is this ...


So exactly what part of the airplane is still ON the runway?
Avroman is offline  
Old 06-24-2016, 04:42 PM
  #84  
Gets Weekends Off
 
J Dawg's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2007
Posts: 295
Default

Originally Posted by Avroman View Post
So exactly what part of the airplane is still ON the runway?
Remains of a blown tire? Gotta love UPS spin.
J Dawg is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
OOTSK
Atlas/Polar
2
06-03-2015 03:01 PM
Baja
Cargo
7
07-25-2010 01:43 PM
AUS_ATC
Cargo
0
10-05-2007 08:43 AM
AUS_ATC
Cargo
9
02-11-2007 07:04 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices