Aircraft Recognition help
#3
It is an A-5, although I can't tell if it is an RA-5C. There were attack variants, and reconnaisance variants. The recce version had a canoe-fairing under the fuselage, but from this camera angle, you can't tell. However, it seems that the majority of those built were RA-5Cs.
The A-5 used two J-79 engines, just like the F-4. It had a bomb-bay tunnel that could eject a nuke rearwards, between the two engines.
The vertical fin was unusual. It has no rudder. In the same manner that most supersonic fighters use an all-moving horizontal stabilizer, North American made the vertical fin all-moving as well (didn't believe it when I read about it, but I saw it on the airplane at the museum in Pensacola).
I always thought this airplane was very sleek and ahead of its time. The fuselage actually was largely adapted from the Air Force's aborted F-108 Rapier program.
The A-5 used two J-79 engines, just like the F-4. It had a bomb-bay tunnel that could eject a nuke rearwards, between the two engines.
The vertical fin was unusual. It has no rudder. In the same manner that most supersonic fighters use an all-moving horizontal stabilizer, North American made the vertical fin all-moving as well (didn't believe it when I read about it, but I saw it on the airplane at the museum in Pensacola).
I always thought this airplane was very sleek and ahead of its time. The fuselage actually was largely adapted from the Air Force's aborted F-108 Rapier program.
#7
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jan 2009
Position: Airbus 319/320 Captain
Posts: 880
Are those first generation winglets at the end of the wing?? Just kidding fellas. Out of all the naval aircraft of that era, I believe that the A-5 is the most beautiful. Just a great airplane to look at and would have loved to piloted one around. Sounds like a very challenging beast to bring aboard.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post