Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Cargo
Unrealistic Accepted Fares.......Again >

Unrealistic Accepted Fares.......Again

Search
Notices
Cargo Part 121 cargo airlines

Unrealistic Accepted Fares.......Again

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-29-2013, 06:48 AM
  #1  
Ok, No more sleeping Dog
Thread Starter
 
FLMD11CAPT's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Position: MD-11, F/O
Posts: 889
Default Unrealistic Accepted Fares.......Again

"It's like Deja Vu all over again...." Have a 13:10hr DH CAN-CDG. Published accepted fare $3963, actual fare paid $6622. This Mgmt. section is so twisted and untruthful. I wonder how it would stack up if looked at under the Co's Ethics and Practices stated business policy?
FLMD11CAPT is offline  
Old 10-29-2013, 07:31 AM
  #2  
Gets Weekends Off
 
USMCFDX's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2006
Posts: 1,804
Default

Accepted fare MEM-ANC $873

Purchased by the company for the middle of next month $1100
USMCFDX is offline  
Old 10-29-2013, 07:45 AM
  #3  
Gets Weekends Off
 
MaydayMark's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2006
Position: MD-11 Captain
Posts: 4,304
Default

Hey Negotiating Committee / MEC lurkers ... is there any chance we can fix this problem while we're in Contract Negotiations?
MaydayMark is offline  
Old 10-29-2013, 08:10 AM
  #4  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Laughing_Jakal's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,336
Default

I think they were going to be called Excepted Fares, because one flight a month could actually be had for that fare, and it would be the exception that proved the rule.

Once pilots deviated and found away to fly for less than the real fare, then they became "Accepted Fares", by both the company and the deviator.

I refuse to Accept the fare quoted, and don't deviate.
Laughing_Jakal is offline  
Old 10-29-2013, 08:26 AM
  #5  
Gets Weekends Off
 
MaydayMark's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2006
Position: MD-11 Captain
Posts: 4,304
Default

Originally Posted by Laughing_Jakal View Post
I think they were going to be called Excepted Fares
Maybe we can change the name to "Unacceptable Fares" in the CBA language? This seems like a cheesy way for Management to scrape for nickels?

Why should we have to negotiate this issue, why wouldn't management just fix it because it's the "right thing to do." (Just Culture?). I guess they've given up on the concept of a happy workforce that does a good job because they feel appreciated?

What was that old Federal Express slogan? "If you take care of your employees, they'll take care of the customer ... and we'll make a profit?" ... Or something like that? Maybe I'm confused?
MaydayMark is offline  
Old 10-29-2013, 08:31 AM
  #6  
Gets Weekends Off
 
The Walrus's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2010
Position: Socket Drawer
Posts: 1,797
Default

Hypothetical situation.

Accepted fare $875. Ticket bought for you and email received for $1500. Once received, pilot deviates with a ticket for $1175 of same class. Outcome?
The Walrus is offline  
Old 10-29-2013, 08:39 AM
  #7  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,196
Default

Originally Posted by The Walrus View Post
Hypothetical situation.

Accepted fare $875. Ticket bought for you and email received for $1500. Once received, pilot deviates with a ticket for $1175 of same class. Outcome?
I think the pilot would be $300 short in his trip bank. Once you click the deviate button, you enter the world of accepted fare, unless you have a lot of time to play email and phone tag with the money folks and maybe find one with a sympathetic ear.
Rock is offline  
Old 10-29-2013, 09:40 AM
  #8  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2007
Posts: 333
Default I hear Ya!

Originally Posted by FLMD11CAPT View Post
"It's like Deja Vu all over again...." Have a 13:10hr DH CAN-CDG. Published accepted fare $3963, actual fare paid $6622. This Mgmt. section is so twisted and untruthful. I wonder how it would stack up if looked at under the Co's Ethics and Practices stated business policy?
Come on man, a double standard is better than no standard at all.....right? The thing that amazes me most, is that WE can be fired for a "lack of integrity" yet it's okay for the company! Complete and total Bull$hit! Ethics and business? No such thing.
Dakota is offline  
Old 10-29-2013, 10:31 AM
  #9  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Adlerdriver's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2007
Position: 767 Captain
Posts: 3,988
Default

Originally Posted by The Walrus View Post
Hypothetical situation.

Accepted fare $875. Ticket bought for you and email received for $1500. Once received, pilot deviates with a ticket for $1175 of same class. Outcome?
I agree with Rock. Out the $300.

One other situation that comes up occasionally is a trip with multiple DHs and one of the actual ticket prices overshoot the accepted.
Say you have front DH with $3000 accepted fare. There's also a mid-trip DH with an accepted fare of $500. You deviate and buy a ticket for $2800, planning on using the $200 for GT, airport parking or whatever.

The mid-trip DH ticket actually costs $1000. In that case, once you actually fly the mid-trip as scheduled and your trip is over you can put in for an adjustment to your bank. On your expense report, via a discrepancy in the travel bank section, you can raise the accepted fare on that mid-trip DH to match the actual so the $200 you were counting on is still available for your use.
Adlerdriver is offline  
Old 10-29-2013, 12:20 PM
  #10  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2006
Position: 767 FO
Posts: 8,047
Default

Originally Posted by The Walrus View Post
Hypothetical situation.

Accepted fare $875. Ticket bought for you and email received for $1500. Once received, pilot deviates with a ticket for $1175 of same class. Outcome?
As soon as you deviate your "approved" bank on your expense report will shrink from the actual fare to the accepted fare so you will have to find the $300 elsewhere.

You hypothetical used to be the standard practice. It was even written in the expense report instructions that you could use the higher of: the accepted fare, your actual fare, or the actual fare of anyone on the pairing. But when the company went to their FOX reporting system in 2006 they unilaterally changed the rules. We opted to negotiate in good faith instead of using the grievance system.
FDXLAG is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
machz990
Cargo
8
10-21-2011 06:06 PM
Lucky7
Cargo
11
01-18-2010 01:03 PM
Gunter
Cargo
20
05-07-2008 05:38 PM
Fedex
Cargo
19
09-03-2007 10:28 AM
hyperone
Cargo
0
08-08-2007 11:21 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices