Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major
Important Take Action-US Customs in Abu Dhabi >

Important Take Action-US Customs in Abu Dhabi

Search
Notices
Major Legacy, National, and LCC

Important Take Action-US Customs in Abu Dhabi

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-09-2012, 03:06 PM
  #1  
Can't abide NAI
Thread Starter
 
Bucking Bar's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2007
Position: Douglas Aerospace post production Flight Test & Work Around Engineering bulletin dissembler
Posts: 11,990
Default Important Take Action-US Customs in Abu Dhabi

This applies to just about every US based commercial pilot. I encourage everyone to participate in this call to action.


Source: ALPA

The U.S. and United Arab Emirates (UAE) governments are in talks to create a new U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) preclearance facility at Abu Dhabi International Airport—and Etihad Airways’ CEO is “confident” they will succeed. An Abu Dhabi CBP preclearance facility may be great news for state-owned Etihad, but for U.S. pilots, it means just another competitive advantage handed to foreign airlines by flawed U.S. policy. The good news is we have the ability to stop this proposal—by contacting the White House today and telling the administration that this proposal represents a serious threat to our jobs and the U.S. airline industry.

Why would a new preclearance facility in the UAE be so bad for U.S. pilots? By allowing passengers flying to the United States from Abu Dhabi to clear customs while still in the UAE, Etihad Airways provides a hefty convenience for its customers and an advantage over U.S. carriers competing with Etihad to attract the rapidly growing numbers of passengers flying from the Middle East and Asia. There is currently no service via a U.S. carrier to Abu Dhabi, meaning the new preclearance facility will only benefit Etihad—and that jeopardizes your career by strengthening a competitor and disadvantaging U.S. carriers. The United States already operates 15 preclearance locations in Canada, Ireland, and the Caribbean, but each of these airports are served by at least one U.S. airline and much of that traffic to the United States is flown by U.S. pilots.

What’s more, DHS is also seeking permission from Congress to provide more preclearance facilities to foreign governments that will pay. If successful, this “money talks” policy could lead to more U.S. handouts to our competitors. Tell the White House today to end this proposal for a CBP preclearance facility in Abu Dhabi and in other airports around the world that benefit our competitors and threaten the stability of the U.S. airline industry.

----

If your pilot association is communicating on this matter, participate. If you wish to communicate directly with the White House, here is a link:

http://www.whitehouse.gov/contact
Bucking Bar is offline  
Old 12-09-2012, 03:09 PM
  #2  
Moderator
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: B757/767
Posts: 13,088
Default

Agreed. I did it. Every ALPA pilot should.
johnso29 is offline  
Old 12-09-2012, 03:33 PM
  #3  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2005
Posts: 195
Default

I asked the White House to support it.
hair-on-fire is offline  
Old 12-09-2012, 03:41 PM
  #4  
I have shiny jet syndrome
 
RJtrashPilot's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2008
Position: ELACS, FACs and SECs. Who doesn't love 'em?
Posts: 984
Default

Just asking a question. Would this not be an issue if United or Delta flew into AUH? If this program were going to be available in DXB, would there be a call to action since both Delta and United fly there? If United or Delta announce tomorrow that they will begin service to AUH soon, would this call to action go away?

Or am I being short sighted and not seeing the bigger issue? I fully concede that, as usual, it may be operator error!

Last edited by RJtrashPilot; 12-09-2012 at 03:53 PM.
RJtrashPilot is offline  
Old 12-09-2012, 03:47 PM
  #5  
Moderator
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: B757/767
Posts: 13,088
Default

Originally Posted by hair-on-fire View Post
I asked the White House to support it.
You realize this statement is left open to interpretation? It can go either way.
johnso29 is offline  
Old 12-09-2012, 03:54 PM
  #6  
Gets Weekends Off
 
The Dominican's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Position: 747 captain
Posts: 1,549
Default

Wondering when airlines here in the US will address the actual advantage that other airlines abroad have, better service, plain and simple.
The Dominican is offline  
Old 12-09-2012, 03:59 PM
  #7  
Moderator
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: B757/767
Posts: 13,088
Default

Originally Posted by The Dominican View Post
Wondering when airlines here in the US will address the actual advantage that other airlines abroad have, better service, plain and simple.
You bring up an excellent point. I'm not entirely certain of other countries laws. Are airlines like Singapore, KAL, Eithad, Emirates, etc allowed to turn down FAs that don't meet their standards for looks, weight, etc? It seems like the US airlines is at a disadvantage because discrimination laws. Then again, if these exist for the airlines I mentioned then they aren't at a disadvantage.

I saw a KAL cabin crew at my LAX layover hotel. Sigh......if only Delta enforced their standards.
johnso29 is offline  
Old 12-09-2012, 04:20 PM
  #8  
Gets Weekends Off
 
The Dominican's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Position: 747 captain
Posts: 1,549
Default

It is not the look or age of the cabin attendants as to why airlines abroad have better service, things as basic as clean lavatories, food that doesn't look like dog barf, your bag coming back without several scratches on it (if it comes back the same day that is) the mentality of our airlines is that they are a transport industry, their mentality is that they are in the service industry. What is sad is that the concept was invented here, that is what I think needs to be rediscovered.
The Dominican is offline  
Old 12-09-2012, 04:45 PM
  #9  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Posts: 478
Default

Originally Posted by The Dominican View Post
It is not the look or age of the cabin attendants as to why airlines abroad have better service, things as basic as clean lavatories, food that doesn't look like dog barf, your bag coming back without several scratches on it (if it comes back the same day that is) the mentality of our airlines is that they are a transport industry, their mentality is that they are in the service industry. What is sad is that the concept was invented here, that is what I think needs to be rediscovered.
What is sad is that US airlines are one of the most regulated/taxed "deregulated" industries out there. What type of subsidies are these "great" foreign airlines receiving from their host countries......
Rather B Fishin is offline  
Old 12-09-2012, 04:54 PM
  #10  
Gets Weekends Off
 
The Dominican's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Position: 747 captain
Posts: 1,549
Default

Why don't you tell us, what are the subsidies you speak off?
The Dominican is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Bucking Bar
Major
32
06-04-2012 07:22 PM
oldfr8dog
Cargo
8
03-31-2011 12:12 PM
CaptMidnight
Cargo
52
04-26-2009 05:49 PM
FlyinFoSheezy
Fractional
1
12-07-2008 03:41 PM
MD-11Loader
Middle East
1
07-27-2008 03:50 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices