Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major
Spirit recall, get some drama for your Mama >

Spirit recall, get some drama for your Mama

Search
Notices
Major Legacy, National, and LCC

Spirit recall, get some drama for your Mama

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-15-2015, 09:41 PM
  #21  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2007
Position: A320 captain
Posts: 209
Default

Originally Posted by gonyon View Post
I think most in the rank and file are for this change, though the timing isn't ideal.
I think you might do well to think about how you arrived at this opinion. Are you thinking for yourself or have you been taken in by the same spin doctors that have and will sell this recall as an effort to unite the Spirit pilot group?

Think about it because the only uniting they have done is to unite the dividers. Ultimately it won't stand the light of day.
TTOCSMCC is offline  
Old 04-16-2015, 01:56 AM
  #22  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Plane Ramrod's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2010
Posts: 1,577
Default

Originally Posted by NJGov View Post
Three are several hundred pilots in council 77 and 109.. Where was the discussion held about the recall? And please show me some empirical evidence of where a 'majority' as you say, wanted this to happen.
There is no membership vote for MEC officers, they are elected / removed by the status reps that they are supposed to be serving. Apparently the status reps were not happy with the chair/vice chair's performance. I don't remember any discussion before they were installed. Does Ben poll you when deciding whether or not to replace his secretary?
Ben poled us all back in 2010, but that was different
Plane Ramrod is offline  
Old 04-16-2015, 02:04 AM
  #23  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Position: A320 CA
Posts: 501
Default

Originally Posted by NJGov View Post
Respectfully, you didn't answer my questions but merely re-iterated your preference and opinion. I'm not saying they are invalid but the process in which this was done surely was detestable.

30 pilots is hardly a majority even in your own LEC. It was a vocal minority whose desire for change is honorable (which I'm personally not against), but again I'll say this was not the way we as professionals ought to conduct business.
If you want empirical or statistical evidence, you need to inquire the reps about it. What is evident to me, and my perception, is that a pretty big sample of pilots of 77 support this shift in leadership. The reasons were declared by the reps on an email to the 77 membership.
A320Flyer is offline  
Old 04-16-2015, 06:44 AM
  #24  
Line Holder
Thread Starter
 
Stoutbrewer's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2008
Position: A320
Posts: 61
Default

Originally Posted by A320Flyer View Post
18 rep's Facebook posts that many have seen that I am referring to. Conduct unbecoming a gentleman in his position as a LEC representative. The P2P chair...well, many have seen those to. Another inappropriate action and violation of the Code of Ethics. Integrity and ethics is something missing nowadays.
"I had to hit that *****, and she had the balls to go to the police"

Yeah, the council 18 rep is the problem here. This exercise in unity will be the gift that keeps giving for a long time.
As far as integrity and codes and all that stuff- more than a couple recall plans have been hatched in your off campus bbq education sessions. I always thought recalls were far too damaging to be of value, but maybe I was wrong. Perhaps we should rip a few more bandaids off and start cleansed around here.
Stoutbrewer is offline  
Old 04-16-2015, 12:52 PM
  #25  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Position: A320 CA
Posts: 501
Default

Originally Posted by Stoutbrewer View Post
As far as integrity and codes and all that stuff- more than a couple of recall plans have been hatched in your off campus bbq education sessions.
Are you referring to the fun social gatherings the DFW pilots enjoy every now and then to fraternize and discuss the state of our union, airline and industry? Are you telling me your friends never do that either?! Two things I can guarantee you...First, nobody has ever discussed recalling anyone and second, at OUR gatherings an ALPA credit card is never used to pay the tab.
A320Flyer is offline  
Old 04-16-2015, 03:52 PM
  #26  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2015
Position: A320 Left
Posts: 134
Default

Originally Posted by NJGov View Post
Three are several hundred pilots in council 77 and 109.. Where was the discussion held about the recall? And please show me some empirical evidence of where a 'majority' as you say, wanted this to happen.

This was done in a tasteless manner. An offense to children to even label this as childlike behavior.

The result doesn't bother me at all, it's the way we got there. Ironically, many people part of this agenda 'campaigned' on transparency. It's total hypocrisy.
77 is where my membership resides. During the recent elections candidates from both bases ran on a campaign of change, and the more reasoned of the two tickets won. Now then the more reasoned of the two have decided that the Chairman needed to be changed. The pilots had their election and their duly elected representatives are now following their campaign platform.

As a 77 member, I am comfortable with my elected rep doing what he thinks is best. After all, that is why we elect reps. ALPA is not a democracy, it's a representative form of government.
GeauxPro is offline  
Old 04-16-2015, 03:55 PM
  #27  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2015
Position: A320 Left
Posts: 134
Default

Originally Posted by Plane Ramrod View Post
There is no membership vote for MEC officers, they are elected / removed by the status reps that they are supposed to be serving. Apparently the status reps were not happy with the chair/vice chair's performance. I don't remember any discussion before they were installed. Does Ben poll you when deciding whether or not to replace his secretary?
Ben poled us all back in 2010, but that was different
Ditto. Love how you worked this in, "that they are supposed to be serving". Thank You
GeauxPro is offline  
Old 04-16-2015, 03:57 PM
  #28  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2015
Position: A320 Left
Posts: 134
Default

Originally Posted by TTOCSMCC View Post
I think you might do well to think about how you arrived at this opinion. Are you thinking for yourself or have you been taken in by the same spin doctors that have and will sell this recall as an effort to unite the Spirit pilot group?

Think about it because the only uniting they have done is to unite the dividers. Ultimately it won't stand the light of day.
"Ultimately it won't stand the light of day"?

What do you mean by that?
GeauxPro is offline  
Old 04-16-2015, 04:12 PM
  #29  
Line Holder
Thread Starter
 
Stoutbrewer's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2008
Position: A320
Posts: 61
Default

Originally Posted by A320Flyer View Post
Are you referring to the fun social gatherings the DFW pilots enjoy every now and then to fraternize and discuss the state of our union, airline and industry? Are you telling me your friends never do that either?! Two things I can guarantee you...First, nobody has ever discussed recalling anyone and second, at OUR gatherings an ALPA credit card is never used to pay the tab.
No, I guess I meant the former location in FLL, for both attempts at
the recall of Frank Hann.
Stoutbrewer is offline  
Old 04-16-2015, 05:47 PM
  #30  
New Hire
 
Joined APC: Apr 2015
Posts: 2
Default

This is a narrative of what happened at the recent Spirit MEC meeting that resulted in the recall of Chris Amongero and Paul Hopkins:
The recall was not on the advance agenda however there was another agenda item that had a great deal of significance. That item was a confidentiality agreement for the MEC members to sign, a little more about that later.
The meeting was started and shortly after the start, a new agenda item was added which was the recall of Chris and Paul. Of the six voting members on the MEC only Paul Degrenier and Todd Hirshon opposed it. Obviously they were outvoted by the status representatives from Councils 77 and 109 so the item was added. At this point it is very important to read the first few words of the Fast Read announcing the recall “After much consideration”.
Ackerman and Leonard made several comments about wanting to be more transparent with the Spirit pilots and when ask later in the meeting why they were recalling two of the highest MEC positions, they only responded with we want to go another direction with no specifics given.
So now the recall is on the floor and the MEC decides to go into closed session. The Committee members present as well as the attending pilots left the room. Within 20 minutes of the closed session beginning, both Paul and Chris exited the meeting room because they had been recalled. The Council 77 and 109 representatives voted in favor of the recall while the Council 18 representatives voted against it.
Here is the strange thing, prior to any vote there is a discussion. When Todd Hirshon attempted to talk about the issue he was basically told to be quiet because the Council 77 and 109 representatives had already decided to recall both of them. How is that for objectivity???
There had been a number of rumors about one of the status representatives recording phone conversations with the members he talked to. In addition there was another rumor that Ackerman had turned pilots over to Spirit HR and the Chief Pilot’s Office, for disciplinary action, regarding disagreements those pilots had with the newly elected status representatives of Council 77 and/or 109 which were recorded. Here is a portion of Ackerman’s email:
“I am deeply troubled to learn that at least two-me included-of our status reps have been intimidated and threatened by pilots on issues from everything including recall of officers, social media, and the council 109 resolution. This is illegal, immoral and this nonsense stops right now. I have reached out to Spirit HR, the chief pilot’s office and ALPA Legal. This behavior is unconscionable.” He also writes”Pilots that want to engage in a smear campaign-threaten-intimidate–and other illegal actions put themselves at serious risk for their jobs and livelihood.” He further writes “I’m doing my part and willing to address anyone or anything that stands in my way of doing the very best thing-short and long term- for the Spirit Pilot”.
When Ackerman and Leonard were asked directly what were the treats, they both responded with something along the line of I don’t remember.
Having shown you that, we turn to the open session of the MEC meeting, which included questions from the pilots attending: Jason Leonard was asked if he recorded phone calls from Spirit Pilots his response was yes. He was then asked if those recordings were shared with anyone else, his response was no. He was then asked if he still had the phone recordings and his answer was no, he had deleted them. He was then asked if he remembered a phone conversation with a specific member and he answered yes. It is unconscionable that an elected status rep would secretly record phone conversations with other members, this not only unconscionable but illegal in the state of Florida. Would you like to be represented at a Disciplinary Meeting with the Company by this guy???
Now we turn to the questions directed to James Ackerman: He was asked if he had recently turned in member/s into the Chief Pilot’s office, he responded yes. Everyone in my immediate vicinity gasp in disbelief. This man just admitted he turned one, or more, of our members into Spirit Management which could “put themselves at serious risk for their jobs and livelihood.”
In the Fast Read sent out 4/15/2015 it stated “The new MEC Chairman, James Ackerman, comes with extensive ALPA experience. He has worked in the role of MEC chairman, Negotiating Committee and as a shop steward on a Teamsters property.” With all of this wealth of experience why did he turn the pilot/s over to the Company instead of our own Professional Standards Committee????
This is clearly an Article 8 (expulsion from ALPA) event. James Ackerman is a status rep for Council 77, anyone want him to represent them knowing he may divulge information shared with him assuming it was confidential???
Now, let’s go back to the Confidentiality agreement that was on the agenda. I won’t mention any names but Chris, Paul Hopkins, Sean Creed, Paul Degrenier and Todd had suspected there was someone on the MEC that has close ties to the Chief Pilot’s Office. This suspicion stemmed from information the Company knew that had only been talked about in the MEC meetings. It was very apparent to Chris, Paul Hopkins, Sean Creed, Paul Degrenier and Todd Hirshon there was a company mole on the MEC. This was the reason for the confidentiality agreement…..to attempt to silence the mole.
After the recall of Chris and Paul, Todd Hirshon, who authored the agenda item, decided to withdraw it so the events could be transparent to the Spirit Pilots.
I believe our current MEC is compromised by the Council 77 and 109 representatives and cannot be trusted.
On the other side, Chris Amongero stepped up to replace Sean Creed as MEC Chairman and immediately engaged Spirit’s Management. He has given his energy, personal time and talents to defend our contract and keep Spirit’s Management from rolling over us.
Paul Hopkins was the Strategic Planning Coordinator before, during and after our strike of almost 5 years ago. His father was the author of “Flying the Line” (vol. 1 & 2). Because of our successful strike Paul was loaned to the ALPA National Strategic Planning Committee.
Sean Creed led our pilots and the MEC in our most desperate times leading up to the strike. He was able to guide the LEC members and manage all of the other committees not directly connected to the strike preparedness. Sean and Andy Nelson oversaw the Negotiating Committee and let them develop the strategies that gave us our quality of life issue in our current CBA.
So there you have it, we now have an MEC Chairman who turned over pilots to spirit management that could “put themselves at serious risk for their jobs and livelihood”, and he apparently was the principle in orchestrating the covert recall of Chris and Paul. We have another status representative who records phone conversations with our members. Then we have one of the status representatives who apparently leaks MEC business to Spirit Management.
It would appear we have a real mess on our hands at the MEC level…..what are you going to do about it???
Stayinformed is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
bubi352
Major
73
07-06-2008 05:58 PM
emj55
Major
8
06-04-2008 03:58 AM
downinthegroove
Regional
2
06-03-2008 05:55 PM
taylorjets
Major
5
01-29-2008 09:41 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices