RAH new hire questions
10-23-2014, 05:41 AM
#191
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Oct 2008
Position: 737
Posts: 165
Originally Posted by Loon
Negotiations to continue twice a week, every week til.TA hammered out; starting second week in November. I'm giving them the benefit of the doubt....for now.
10-23-2014, 05:59 AM
#192
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: May 2011
Position: Piper passenger
Posts: 337
Originally Posted by DSRoss996
So let me get this straight. They both met with the NMB yesterday for the first time since the rejected TA to discuss future meetings with the NMB? That's all I saw from the negotiating committee update. What a colossal waste of time.
Did you miss the email that said they will be meeting every week 2 days a week till we have a new TA. I am not naive enough to believe BB is desperate enough to give us what we want, but he does need a CBA as bad as we do. He still believes we are worth less than we are, but I'm sure the shareholders are demanding he get the labor mess under control, even more since he agreed to purchase (not lease) 2 billion worth of Ejets for United that he can not currently staff. He just has a better poker face than we do, but he's feeling the pressure behind closed doors I'm sure. We will know soon enough I'm sure.
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
10-23-2014, 02:09 PM
#193
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Feb 2014
Position: 737-Right
Posts: 781
Originally Posted by DSRoss996
So let me get this straight. They both met with the NMB yesterday for the first time since the rejected TA to discuss future meetings with the NMB? That's all I saw from the negotiating committee update. What a colossal waste of time.
I've always liked BW and have known DG for a long time; these guys are really gonna get it done IMHO.
With the above being said, I don't trust JC II; I hope he doesn't wipe the slate clean
10-23-2014, 03:47 PM
#194
Line Holder
Joined APC: Sep 2009
Position: Wet behind the ear pis$ ant FO
Posts: 78
Originally Posted by Loon
You know, I hope that I don't eat crow, but I ACTUALLY think that this NC is for real! Unlike the CORRUPT last bunch(one came from enron, that's promising).
I've always liked BW and have known DG for a long time; these guys are really gonna get it done IMHO.
With the above being said, I don't trust JC II; I hope he doesn't wipe the slate clean
I've always liked BW and have known DG for a long time; these guys are really gonna get it done IMHO.
With the above being said, I don't trust JC II; I hope he doesn't wipe the slate clean
The last bunch were corrupt (in your words) but you voted YES? What happened to your assertion that the failed TA would be a "springboard" to a better one 3 years down the line?
If these negotiations produce a TA superior to the last one will you acknowledge the stand taken by your co workers who you constantly belittle?
I'll give you this, you are consistently inconsistent, and constantly contradictory!
10-23-2014, 04:02 PM
#195
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jun 2011
Posts: 1,152
This could explain it...
(From Merriam-Webster)
Main Entry: 1loon
Pronunciation: \ˈlün\
Function: noun
Etymology: Middle English loun
Date: 15th century
1 : lout, idler 2 chiefly Scottish : boy 3 a : a crazy person b : simpleton
If the shoe fits...
(From Merriam-Webster)
Main Entry: 1loon
Pronunciation: \ˈlün\
Function: noun
Etymology: Middle English loun
Date: 15th century
1 : lout, idler 2 chiefly Scottish : boy 3 a : a crazy person b : simpleton
If the shoe fits...
10-23-2014, 05:45 PM
#196
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Posts: 314
The contract will be a zero. Nobody in this day and age will go up against the company for fear of a bad reference with their name attached to it. Everyone wants a job at a major, nobody wants the un-written rule to come down on them. That's the real reason there is no contract with RAH. There is no spineless fish at RAH going to rock the ship. They all want the job at a MAJOR!!!!!!! No rocking the boat.
10-23-2014, 11:58 PM
#197
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jan 2013
Position: CA
Posts: 176
Originally Posted by MR JT8D
The contract will be a zero. Nobody in this day and age will go up against the company for fear of a bad reference with their name attached to it. Everyone wants a job at a major, nobody wants the un-written rule to come down on them. That's the real reason there is no contract with RAH. There is no spineless fish at RAH going to rock the ship. They all want the job at a MAJOR!!!!!!! No rocking the boat.
10-24-2014, 06:48 AM
#198
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Oct 2012
Position: e145 fo
Posts: 250
Originally Posted by MR JT8D
The contract will be a zero. Nobody in this day and age will go up against the company for fear of a bad reference with their name attached to it. Everyone wants a job at a major, nobody wants the un-written rule to come down on them. That's the real reason there is no contract with RAH. There is no spineless fish at RAH going to rock the ship. They all want the job at a MAJOR!!!!!!! No rocking the boat.
10-24-2014, 09:56 AM
#199
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Feb 2014
Position: 737-Right
Posts: 781
Originally Posted by unclenobby
This is dizzying!
The last bunch were corrupt (in your words) but you voted YES? What happened to your assertion that the failed TA would be a "springboard" to a better one 3 years down the line?
If these negotiations produce a TA superior to the last one will you acknowledge the stand taken by your co workers who you constantly belittle?
I'll give you this, you are consistently inconsistent, and constantly contradictory!
The last bunch were corrupt (in your words) but you voted YES? What happened to your assertion that the failed TA would be a "springboard" to a better one 3 years down the line?
If these negotiations produce a TA superior to the last one will you acknowledge the stand taken by your co workers who you constantly belittle?
I'll give you this, you are consistently inconsistent, and constantly contradictory!
Once again is this ALL you got to try to discredit me? Hmmm, I wanted to move forward before, I want to move forward now....REAL contradiction there :-)
Mom's calling you for dinner....go wash up! No fb tonight either for you son! :-)
10-25-2014, 05:19 AM
#200
Line Holder
Joined APC: Sep 2009
Position: Wet behind the ear pis$ ant FO
Posts: 78
Originally Posted by Loon
I fail to see how me wanting a new contract is contradictory; but you keep on laughing and pointing fingers to convince your crowd bub!
Once again is this ALL you got to try to discredit me? Hmmm, I wanted to move forward before, I want to move forward now....REAL contradiction there :-)
Mom's calling you for dinner....go wash up! No fb tonight either for you son! :-)
Once again is this ALL you got to try to discredit me? Hmmm, I wanted to move forward before, I want to move forward now....REAL contradiction there :-)
Mom's calling you for dinner....go wash up! No fb tonight either for you son! :-)
You voted YES to a TA you believe was served up by a "corrupt" NC. All because you want to move forward. Don't see the contradiction?
Contradiction - to be in conflict with.
As for getting a new and improved offer (hopefully). This will be as a result of your fellow co workers voting no on the previous offer. People who you constantly belittle.
Look we get it. You want to make a career out of it at Republic. Nothing wrong with that. You live in base and life is good. You don't want to rock the boat. You believe that we have to stay cheap to stay alive. Luckily the vast majority believe we are worth more and you will ride their coattails.
Last edited by unclenobby; 10-25-2014 at 06:01 AM.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
cloudseer
Flight Schools and Training
2
07-12-2011 05:51 PM
