Search
Notices
Envoy Airlines Regional Airline

Envoy or PDT

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-08-2016, 08:53 AM
  #71  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2015
Position: Gear slinger
Posts: 2,898
Default

Originally Posted by Gman007 View Post
So Piedmont's flow is faster than Envoy's??
Depending on who you talk to re: preojections vs time on property etc. for some people it has been and will be, for other people not so much.

Example: Piedmont pilots with two years on property today are projecting only having another 2-2.5 years until they flow based on attrition and increases flow #s AFTER they got on property. Someone 2 years on property at Envoy today has longer than 2-2.5 years until flow. New Hires at PDT today will most likely have a longer flow than 4-4.5 years due to the number of people ahead of them and their flow being approx 10% of the pilot group per year.

Both Companies are advertising approximatelt a 5 year flow for new hires. I would personally do career planning based on a 7 year flow.
Otterbox is online now  
Old 12-08-2016, 09:00 AM
  #72  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Jersdawg's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2014
Posts: 674
Default

Originally Posted by Gman007 View Post
So Piedmont's flow is faster than Envoy's??
It is projected to be slightly faster than Envoy's. The only way you'll know if it is faster or not is when you're sitting in the seat over at AA.

My advice is to avoid commuting. The schedules at Envoy and PDT are not great right now, and if you lived at home in DFW and drove to work, it would mitigate the terribleness. Commuting to a bad schedule is rough. Of course there is no guarantee you'd get DFW at ENY right off the bat, but as long as you get a 145 slot (which there will be no shortage of) you will be able to bid back to DFW at a fairly early opportunity.

If you lived near PHL, I would be saying the same thing but more in favor of PDT. If you had to commute to either airline, I would probably give PDT the slight nod right now, as well. Living at home makes a HUUUUGE difference.
Jersdawg is offline  
Old 12-08-2016, 01:19 PM
  #73  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2016
Posts: 155
Default

Originally Posted by Jersdawg View Post
It is projected to be slightly faster than Envoy's. The only way you'll know if it is faster or not is when you're sitting in the seat over at AA.

My advice is to avoid commuting. The schedules at Envoy and PDT are not great right now, and if you lived at home in DFW and drove to work, it would mitigate the terribleness. Commuting to a bad schedule is rough. Of course there is no guarantee you'd get DFW at ENY right off the bat, but as long as you get a 145 slot (which there will be no shortage of) you will be able to bid back to DFW at a fairly early opportunity.

If you lived near PHL, I would be saying the same thing but more in favor of PDT. If you had to commute to either airline, I would probably give PDT the slight nod right now, as well. Living at home makes a HUUUUGE difference.

That is exactly why I choose PDT. Salisbury is a 4 hour drive. Harrisburg is a 2 hour drive and PHL is 1.5 hours. I admire guys and gals who commute and the dedication it takes. But I hope to never commute if I can possibly avoid it.
send a check is offline  
Old 12-08-2016, 02:34 PM
  #74  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: May 2016
Posts: 1,609
Default

Originally Posted by Otterbox View Post
Depending on who you talk to re: preojections vs time on property etc. for some people it has been and will be, for other people not so much.

Example: Piedmont pilots with two years on property today are projecting only having another 2-2.5 years until they flow based on attrition and increases flow #s AFTER they got on property. Someone 2 years on property at Envoy today has longer than 2-2.5 years until flow. New Hires at PDT today will most likely have a longer flow than 4-4.5 years due to the number of people ahead of them and their flow being approx 10% of the pilot group per year.

Both Companies are advertising approximatelt a 5 year flow for new hires. I would personally do career planning based on a 7 year flow.
Envoy is going to flow a higher % of its pilots then PDT per year. So all things being equal on paper Envoys flow is faster in a side by side comparison.

But things aren't equal. PDT has a much higher % of its pilots not flowing to AA compared to Envoy. Envoy could flow 50% of each new hire class but it's likely to be limited to 30 per month unless NHs continue to show up. Other factors will impact flow time but it's hard to say who for.

So, who will win in a race? Will the PDT guys start choosing to flow instead of passing it up? Will more Envoy guys pass up flow, get hired at DAL or United or where ever?

I'll Second the advice that the guy before said about commuting and living in base. Good Luck.
Pedro4President is offline  
Old 12-09-2016, 05:20 AM
  #75  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2015
Position: Professional Eugoogoolizer at the Derek Zoolander Center For Kids Who Can’t Read Good
Posts: 1,191
Default

Originally Posted by Pedro4President View Post
Envoy is going to flow a higher % of its pilots then PDT per year. So all things being equal on paper Envoys flow is faster in a side by side comparison.

But things aren't equal. PDT has a much higher % of its pilots not flowing to AA compared to Envoy. Envoy could flow 50% of each new hire class but it's likely to be limited to 30 per month unless NHs continue to show up. Other factors will impact flow time but it's hard to say who for.

So, who will win in a race? Will the PDT guys start choosing to flow instead of passing it up? Will more Envoy guys pass up flow, get hired at DAL or United or where ever?

I'll Second the advice that the guy before said about commuting and living in base. Good Luck.
Other than about 5 people who have passed up the flow right now, all others will remain a "no". That's about 60 people.
MKUltra is offline  
Old 12-09-2016, 11:51 AM
  #76  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2016
Posts: 122
Default

Originally Posted by Jersdawg View Post
It is projected to be slightly faster than Envoy's. The only way you'll know if it is faster or not is when you're sitting in the seat over at AA.

My advice is to avoid commuting. The schedules at Envoy and PDT are not great right now, and if you lived at home in DFW and drove to work, it would mitigate the terribleness. Commuting to a bad schedule is rough. Of course there is no guarantee you'd get DFW at ENY right off the bat, but as long as you get a 145 slot (which there will be no shortage of) you will be able to bid back to DFW at a fairly early opportunity.

If you lived near PHL, I would be saying the same thing but more in favor of PDT. If you had to commute to either airline, I would probably give PDT the slight nod right now, as well. Living at home makes a HUUUUGE difference.
They also projected flow increases at PSA. That never panned out for them. But hey, "we're projecting it, so it has got to happen!".
LongTimeListenr is offline  
Old 12-09-2016, 11:53 AM
  #77  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Aug 2016
Posts: 91
Default

Originally Posted by LongTimeListenr View Post
They also projected flow increases at PSA. That never panned out for them. But hey, "we're projecting it, so it has got to happen!".
They are taking the page from the Envoy playbook. Projecting is a big deal there.
rondonq1 is offline  
Old 12-09-2016, 12:39 PM
  #78  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2013
Posts: 854
Default

Originally Posted by Virga show View Post
2011 NH= 272
2012 NH= 6
2013 NH= 70
2014 NH= 59
2015 NH= 93
2016 NH= 300 +
2017 NH = 600 + at same hire rate now
2017 AA FLOW 360 to 400


You are correct that is good news. Esp if we get more 175's and open more bases. Also not including any attrition to other legacy or LLC's
Your 2017 AA flow is incorrect, Rick Wilson said they expect to flow 330. Considering they only have classes at AA for 11 months of the year, 300-330 seems more realistic. I hope you're right, do you have any evidence whatsoever?
ORDinary is offline  
Old 12-09-2016, 10:25 PM
  #79  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: May 2014
Posts: 273
Default

I chose PDT because they are growing and the junior Jet Captain was hired in July 2016. That is not a projection; and that is before the acceleration of jet deliveries. As far as the flow - it is a projection either way, but I would rather climb through 500 pilots than 1,850 pilots. And at PDT lots of senior guys will chose not to flow. Couple that with little reserve time you can build lots of PIC faster at PDT which will increase your odds at a job with the majors. I would not count on the flow as the only way to get to a major.

Pick a company and move to a base. I would not recommend commuting, especially at the regional level and the regional airlines schedules. Any of the WO is a good choice in today's environment; you have the stability of being owned by AA, decent pay, good travel and healthcare, and a flow. And hopefully bringing back flying to the WO's will be faster movement at all companies.

Last edited by BeechPilot33; 12-09-2016 at 10:41 PM.
BeechPilot33 is offline  
Old 12-10-2016, 05:55 AM
  #80  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2015
Posts: 634
Default

Did the OP make a decision? I really don't think you'd be making a bad choice with either.
Wink is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Jland0413
Envoy Airlines
31
08-27-2016 07:03 PM
SpreadEagle
Envoy Airlines
65
05-25-2016 01:53 PM
Romulus
Envoy Airlines
15
10-14-2014 06:34 PM
Crawl
Envoy Airlines
553
10-09-2014 10:36 AM
AllisonRR
Envoy Airlines
45
10-07-2014 05:54 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices