Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Pilot Lounge > Safety
Jet Blue engine failure after takeoff >

Jet Blue engine failure after takeoff

Search
Notices
Safety Accidents, suggestions on improving safety, etc

Jet Blue engine failure after takeoff

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-19-2014, 06:32 AM
  #1  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
Tanker-driver's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Posts: 295
Default Jet Blue engine failure after takeoff

JetBlue passengers endure scary emergency landing - CNN.com

Second time in the last couple of months for JB. Cellphone video shows the cabin filled with smoke after the incident.
Tanker-driver is offline  
Old 09-19-2014, 10:23 AM
  #2  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2014
Posts: 211
Default

So does it sound like 2 separate issues that happened here or would the smoke-filled cabin somehow be related to a blown engine?
evamodel00 is offline  
Old 09-19-2014, 10:48 AM
  #3  
Day puke
 
FlyJSH's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2006
Position: Out.
Posts: 3,865
Default

Thank heaven everyone took the time to get the camera out and film the events... rather than paying attention to the crew.
FlyJSH is offline  
Old 09-19-2014, 11:05 AM
  #4  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Cycle Pilot's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Position: DAL Pilot
Posts: 1,133
Default

I'm still trying to figure out why or how the crew deployed the O2 masks. I'm wondering if they tried to evacuate the smoke and accidentally climbed the cabin above 14,000?
Cycle Pilot is offline  
Old 09-19-2014, 11:27 AM
  #5  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Posts: 19,273
Default

Originally Posted by Cycle Pilot View Post
I'm still trying to figure out why or how the crew deployed the O2 masks. I'm wondering if they tried to evacuate the smoke and accidentally climbed the cabin above 14,000?
It grew so thick that passengers could no longer see the people seated next to them, said passenger Jonathon Hubbard.
West realized he would have a hard time breathing soon, but oxygen masks did not drop down, he said.
So, flight attendants went around deploying them by hand.


Sounds like the JB flight attendants might need a bit more training.
sailingfun is offline  
Old 09-19-2014, 11:42 AM
  #6  
Gets Weekends Off
 
sandlapper223's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Position: More Drag
Posts: 447
Default

Originally Posted by sailingfun View Post
It grew so thick that passengers could no longer see the people seated next to them, said passenger Jonathon Hubbard.
West realized he would have a hard time breathing soon, but oxygen masks did not drop down, he said.
So, flight attendants went around deploying them by hand.


Sounds like the JB flight attendants might need a bit more training.
Yes they do need more training. The manual deployment tool that FA's carry is intended to be used to deploy masks on the passenger service units that fail to deploy during activation. They ARE NOT to be used for FA manual mask deployment strategies because they want to or especially during smoke or fumes conditions (they will not help anyway).

In addition, the chemical reaction creates heat and fumes - I wouldn't be surprised if some of the smoke seen on the video was a result of that.

Engines can and do fail. Smoke and fumes will enter the cabin and cause chaos in the cabin until professional flight attendants step up and take control. This is what they preach all about right? "We are here to keep your A$$ safe, not kiss it" I hear over and over. So I hope this was not the case - if so, there will be some explaining to do.

Of course, passengers often panic- they know the masks are up there - and start a cascade of ripping them down. But again, the FA's need to take control.

Passenger masks that are deployed during a real fire - smoke or fumes event - is dangerous and can turn an urgent situation into a disaster.
sandlapper223 is offline  
Old 09-19-2014, 12:07 PM
  #7  
Gets Weekends Off
 
sandlapper223's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Position: More Drag
Posts: 447
Default

And further, while I'm Monday morning quarterbacking, is it necessary to dump 140-ish passengers on the runway? Obviously I wasn't there, but assuming the cabin atmosphere is livable, and the failure contained, why evac on the runway? I see too much of this - from a blown tire to smoking brakes or what ever else have you.

Is this a result of our training? Every single PC or type ride is practice stop on the runway, set the parking brake, and put the FA's on alert for an evac. Then practice an evac. Where's the "be a captain, stay cool and using your head" procedure? People usually get hurt when you evacuate - it should be used as a last resort when lives are in imminent danger.

I'm not trying to second guess anyone here, it's just I see too many Evacs in recent times when a safe taxi back to the gate may be the better plan.
sandlapper223 is offline  
Old 09-19-2014, 12:18 PM
  #8  
Moderate Moderator
 
UAL T38 Phlyer's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Position: Curator at Static Display
Posts: 5,681
Default

If the engine failure is due to a bird ingestion, or an oil seal in the compressor section, the remains of the bird or the vaporized oil will come off in the bleed air and go in the packs/cabin.

This (oil seal) happened to an RJ last year on short final at Denver. Smoke was so bad, the crew couldn't see the instruments. They broke out at 100 ft and managed to land without further incident. Very lucky; weather was at minimums and they were inside the marker when it blew.

People in back suffered a lot of vapor inhalation.

If the FAs in this JB scenario called and said "We can't breathe!!", the crew could drop the masks with a switch.
UAL T38 Phlyer is offline  
Old 09-19-2014, 12:25 PM
  #9  
Gets Weekends Off
 
sandlapper223's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Position: More Drag
Posts: 447
Default

This is my point. Passenger oxygen masks are not designed nor intended for smoke protection. Most SOP's clearly state to not deploy passenger masks during fire or smoke. They will not prevent the wearer from inhaling smoke and fumes, and can cause the situation to become worse.

The best a crew can do is keep the passengers calm and perform the smoke removal procedure if it becomes the biggest threat. If the bleed from the engine isnt contained by pushing the fire handle or pack is belching toxic fumes - the packs and bleeds need selected off and open the ram air and raise the cabin. Deploying 140 passenger masks with chem generators isn't going to do diddly squat.
sandlapper223 is offline  
Old 09-19-2014, 01:48 PM
  #10  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Posts: 19,273
Default

Originally Posted by UAL T38 Phlyer View Post
If the engine failure is due to a bird ingestion, or an oil seal in the compressor section, the remains of the bird or the vaporized oil will come off in the bleed air and go in the packs/cabin.

This (oil seal) happened to an RJ last year on short final at Denver. Smoke was so bad, the crew couldn't see the instruments. They broke out at 100 ft and managed to land without further incident. Very lucky; weather was at minimums and they were inside the marker when it blew.

People in back suffered a lot of vapor inhalation.

If the FAs in this JB scenario called and said "We can't breathe!!", the crew could drop the masks with a switch.
Why? It would not help them breath. It's a very low mix of O2 with ambient air on those masks. With the cabin below 14 k and going down there is no need.
sailingfun is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
benzoate
Major
0
02-07-2014 12:16 PM
Ultralight
Regional
88
06-27-2013 10:06 AM
turk
Flight Schools and Training
29
01-13-2012 05:58 AM
4andCounting
Major
37
10-25-2010 07:47 PM
CSU1
JetBlue
6
11-18-2005 07:38 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices