Originally Posted by
WeaselBoy
It's not spin, it's my opinion.
But, to continue your analogy, currently we have a Republican controlled Congress and a Democratic controlled Senate. How effective have they been in the last year? Why would I want to support a system that is going to be just as dysfunctional and spend a ton of cash on a Legislative branch (or in this case, arbitrators). This would have, in effect made RPC an combination of FAPA pilots, FFD pilots, and arbitrators on permanent retainer.
And again, completely my opinion, but for FAPA to attempt to create RPC and at the same time file a lawsuit to nullify the IMSL didn't really instill a lot of trust from our pilot group.
That WASN'T my analogy, but if you're going down that road, are you a fan of Obama-care? That's the result of one party controlling both branches of congress. Abortions becoming altogether illegal in all circumstances would be result of all branches swinging far to the right.
But like I said, that wasn't my analogy. My point is that the logical extension of your argument is that the congress isn't fair to states like California and New York. Rolling F9 into RAH isn't fair to the F9 guys, unless you can explain how we would reasonably end up with ANY representation on the EXCO.