Originally Posted by
SenecaII
Nice assumption. I did a ton of time building in various experimental aircraft and flying piston twins under VFR only 135 to build my PIC twin time and then moved on to a very good charter company flying turbine equipment. Since I am not a 1500 hr CFI , your definition is I am not good enough for the airlines??? I have two types and NO DESIRE to work at the regionals when I am making 4x the pay for the same equipment. I stand by my observations of the former 3oo hour wonder guys that are spouting this stuff. Am I behind fixing industry issues, yes, but the ATP rule is not the answer in my book. Addressing training and rest is. But in true APC fashion you have made assumptions without information......Thumbs up
My assumptions fit the general population - like yours I guess
No assumptions here about you personally at all.
From your previous posts I have assumed that you ar where you want to be or have a plan for where you want to go.
Sorry you took the sentence so literally...I can see why you did.
That was a lot of typing to make your point Boiler
You still haven't come up with an different answer though that better equates the experience -vs- hours question. I'm a believer in quality too, but there still has to be a line.
USMCFLYR