Originally Posted by
Old UCAL CA
There was a disagreement at the senior officer level about the most judicious use of available cash approaching a "softening" period (late 1990's/2000).
That dispute made it's way to the board and, unfortunately, Mr. Brenneman was on the losing side of the argument at the board level. Senior executive teams usually require loyalty and a common approach..that was the end of the team.
Yep... That is what I recall also. However, I wish Greg would have won... I think CAL would have been better off!