Originally Posted by
forgot to bid
thats how I read it and I think it's what it was saying except why are they there in the first place? I wish I had it to read again because it's worth talking about.
Yes, It is something that deserves to be talked about. I believe it is in there because of a lost (or settled because it was going to be lost) court battle. While it may appear to be somewhat benign, it is concessionary and an example of the camels head being under the tent. I dont like camels heads under my tent.
What are ALPA scope goals? Does ALPA even know strategically what they are? Has anyone ever read what ALPA's scope goals are? Do ALPAs scope goals favor major or regional carriers (IMO if the goals don't take a side, by default they take the side of regionals). How can anyone say there is no conflict of interest at ALPA?